Not exact matches
She took a moment out of her busy schedule to discuss the evolutionary growth of ebooks in the
library, how the discovery of content is a top priority, what it took to talk Simon & Schuster and Penguin
into joining the
library lending model, and how
libraries are selling ebooks.
Overdrive, the largest company devoted to digital
library lending has just expanded
into Japan.
While visitors still had to come
into their
libraries to access the list of titles, they were gaining this access to content that wasn't readily available for device
lending elsewhere.
An article for Mainichi.jp on the ups and down of digital
library lending in Japan demonstrated some interesting parallels to what readers in other countries have faced when trying to shift
into a digital
lending mindset.
The essence of the pilot is to carry out real - time, real - world research
into the impact of eBook
lending in public
libraries on authors, publishers and on the
library service so that a suitable and sustainable model.
Overdrive is basically providing a ton of tools over the next six months that will allow most people to write their own apps with
library lending functionality built right
into it.
More importantly, it's an acceptable solution when considering that the alternative is to not be able to offer ebook
lending to their patrons, an initiative that
libraries will have to offer if they plan to move forward
into a future where so many readers are going digital.
Penguin, which removed all of its e-books from
libraries and ended its relationship with digital
library distributor OverDrive in February, is tiptoeing back
into the digital
lending waters again.
According to the February 10 post in Publisher's Lunch, forcing patrons to come
into the
library to borrow ebooks is also the appropriate model for ebook
lending.
A
lending library that allows the user to have access to the title only one time could very well translate
into even higher numbers of sales, as consumers opt to buy a title that they particularly enjoyed.
Unfortunately, a report that was released earlier this year showed that one way publishers are looking
into protecting authors is to ban off - site or remote ebook
lending, thereby requiring patrons to come
into their local
libraries in order to borrow ebooks, essentially destroying one of the key advantages to e-reading, namely, the portability and anywhere access to ebooks.
This coincides with the existing agreements that Smashwords already has to put tiers of ebooks
into public
library ebook
lending circulation.
Thousands of academic, professional and public
libraries around the world have integrated the platform
into daily
lending activities, and have access to hundreds of thousands of titles that cover all major disciplines.
A
library system can often only afford to deal with one wholesaler, the costs of integration
into lending systems are too high for them to choose between multiple vendors.
Amazon's entry
into public
libraries and their own
lending process through the Prime program has just quadrupled the activity in ebook
lending.
One thing forgot to mention is with Kindle if you want to get
into their «Kindle select» (their
lending library where you get royalties when people loan your book out) you do sign an exclusive deal with them but it's only for 90 days with a clear cutoff date when you can re-sign if you want.
All I know is that if given a chance, I would definitely put the Peachville High Demons books
into the
lending library.
My only question is how do I get Beautiful Demons
into the
lending library?
This will allow you to create your own
library lending apps or build the functionality
into an e-reader or tablet.
Would readers really pledge money in order to strip a book of its DRM and copyright in order to thrust it
into the public domain and make it available anywhere for
library lending?
The news that HarperCollins had put restrictions
into its e-book licenses for
lending library services so that each «acquired» title could only be loaned out 26 times was fresh and appeared as a side note in my article.
Now, the government is looking
into mandated ebook
lending and the creation of virtual
libraries.
The goal was to establish real - time, real - world research
into the impact of eBook
lending in public
libraries to placate authors, publishers and find a sustainable model.
For indie authors and publishers who can agree to Amazon's list of demands, notably making their works available exclusively through Amazon for a set period of time and allowing their works to be loaned through the Kindle
lending library, there is a fund of $ 6 million, divided
into monthly amounts, allocated to pay authors as ebooks are borrowed.
But the extension of OverDrive
lending to the Kindle flipped
libraries into the Amazon column.
I will be honest, I've been waiting for some publisher to start backing out of
library programs using the same argument they have about not allowing e-book
lending — that allowing someone to walk
into a
library and borrow a book is costing the publisher sales.
Yeah, it looks an awful lot like an Amazon shopping page and I have to be logged
into my Amazon account to get the book... The NYPL's Christopher Platt recently told Publishing Trends that since Kindle added
library lending, «Our average new - patron registrations have more than doubled from 80 a day to 172 a day.
Second, yet another major trade book publisher, Penguin, got
into a spat with public
libraries over e-book
lending.
Amazon does its free -
lending -
library thing because it wrote the rights to do so
into its contracts with non-major publishers (and with authors who signed on directly with Amazon).
The other librarians were not in agreement with Marx's suggestion that
libraries should consider introducing more «friction»
into the
lending of ebooks to address publishers» fears that
library lending will destroy the nascent consumer market for ebooks.
Enter the Authors Guild who believes that the authors have not given their publishers the right to enlist their books
into this
lending library, even if they're getting paid for each loan.
Most of the the
library and ebook pundits go over the nitty - gritty details of the Kindle
Lending Library, compare the extremely restrictive terms of Amazon's initial foray
into lending services with the vast array of
library offerings, and pronounce that
libraries have nothing to worry about.
I don't haven't looked
into it at all, but I assume that Amazon has a reason that they don't yet offer things like the
lending library on the app (non-Kindle hardware) versions.
Presumably this will also come
into play with
library lending models, but it's an interesting development to look out for as Baker and Taylor is such a large jobber.
One of those reasons: Publishers might worry that e-book
library lending will cut
into sales.
The functionality in both OneClickdigital ™ and Zinio ™ for
Libraries — two leading library lending apps currently in use by thousands of libraries around the world — is now seamlessly merged into the new RBdig
Libraries — two leading
library lending apps currently in use by thousands of
libraries around the world — is now seamlessly merged into the new RBdig
libraries around the world — is now seamlessly merged
into the new RBdigital app.
Two years ago, publisher William Sieghart's review
into remote e-lending said that public
libraries should be able to
lend ebooks remotely.
In a press release this morning, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) has announced that they have been working with Overdrive to integrate the Kindle
into a
library lending friendly system and will be rolling out the product of these efforts later this year.
Students in Simon Fraser University's School for the Contemporary Arts (SCA) have repurposed and decorated 11 newspaper boxes
into miniature
lending libraries now available across downtown Vancouver.
The Dutch reference for a preliminary ruling is based on the following facts: A report commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture had opined that the
lending of e-books did not fall within the scope of application of Directive 2006/115 (as transposed
into Dutch law) and, as a result,
libraries could not benefit from an exception to the exclusive
lending right to
lend e-books to the public.
This would enable also smaller
libraries to engage
into public
lending of e-books, the concrete implications on the relevant market and business models related to public e-
lending are difficult to predict.