A majority of
library patrons consider purchasing books discovered on a library website.
Not exact matches
According to the same Pew report, 53 % of
patrons surveyed think
libraries need more ebooks, and another 42 % «definitely» believe
libraries should move most of their catalogs and services to an online portal for
patrons to use remotely (and additional 34 % think it's something
libraries and
patrons should at least
consider).
More importantly, it's an acceptable solution when
considering that the alternative is to not be able to offer ebook lending to their
patrons, an initiative that
libraries will have to offer if they plan to move forward into a future where so many readers are going digital.
In fact, we strongly encourage authors to
consider donating some of their books to
libraries for the platform - building benefit, because market data strongly indicates that
libraries are incredibly powerful sources of author discovery for
library patrons, and
library patrons buy a lot of books.
That
libraries are going in this direction without
considering the impact on ILL are really shooting ourselves, our
patrons, our profession, in the foot.
library patrons who borrow ebooks go on to purchase 3.2 additional books per month, and a majority (57 %) would
consider buying ebooks found on a
library website
PORTLAND, Ore. — Sept. 1, 2015 — Multnomah County
Library is accepting submissions of adult fiction by local authors to be
considered for inclusion in the
library's e-book collection and promoted to
library patrons.
Librarians want books that will appeal to their
patrons and drive traffic into their
libraries, so
consider approaching your ideal
libraries with your marketing plan at the ready.
So it makes sense, as electronic access becomes even more prevalent, to
consider the possibility of moving the physical presence of
libraries to a single space which is: (i) capable of holding all remaining materials, (ii) readily accessible to walk - in
patrons and (iii) more economical than the prime office space occupied by some
libraries.
The case law seems to suggest that, rather than deciding public access policies based solely on considerations of the public or private nature of their universities, the amount of public funding received, or their
library's depository status, librarians can
consider the individual characteristics of their own universities — the university's mission, their
patrons» needs, their financial circumstances, and the place they see for their academic
library in the larger community.