But perfectly «reputable»,
licensed breeders do operate from kennel environments, not home environments.
Not exact matches
High volume kitten - sellers rely mainly on direct marketing, primarily because USDA
licensing is only required for
breeders who sell animals to brokers who then re-sell them to pet stores and because most brokers and transporters
do not buy kittens to resell.
If it seems difficult to understand why
breeders who already meet these regulations continue to oppose rules which mirror what they already follow, consider that the USDA
license does not compel them to declare their actual sales and it is not tied to any business tax.
Considering that not one Oklahoma sales tax permit has been issued for a business declaring itself to be a dog
breeder, and considering that the new agency was created as a self sustaining agency that relies on the
licensing fees as many other agencies
do, it is hard to understand why some Oklahoma legislators feel the need to punish dogs and Oklahoma tax payers alike by forestalling these regulations.
Does the US Government require
breeders to obtain a breeding
license, and if not why?
So, a «USDA
licensed breeder» in the window doesn't indicate much about where the animals actually come from or how they're being treated.
Although the rest of the states remain silent and have no laws regulating
breeders at all, and other states don't even require ANY
licenses and inspections, these new standards set by states, and operating on the territory of those states, is a big step toward strict regulation of the industry, and perhaps abolishing it as phenomena in the future.
The tagline «USDA
licensed breeder» sounds pretty official, doesn't it?
Pinkleton, defending her group's decision not to seek a veto, said the new law
does contain something else that may help save animals in the long run: a committee to study the breeding of pets by
licensed and unlicensed
breeders in Arizona and elsewhere.
«A lot of pet stores will say, «We don't get pets from puppy mills, but from USDA -
licensed breeders,» said Cori Menkin, senior director of the ASPCA puppy mills campaign.
In the Texas case, some of the
breeders the dogs came from had multiple Animal Welfare Act violations, and some didn't even have
licenses at the time they sold their puppies.
The fact that the
breeder has a USDA
license does not provide an assurance of quality or humane breeding.
Licensed breeders undergo routine inspections of their facilities and treat their animals with care, so you don't have to worry about the ethics of their operation.
But this
breeder also
did more than just retail sales — she continued to sell to pet stores, which was in violation of the Animal Welfare Act as she no longer had an AWA
license.
Also, the USDA
does not look for AWA compliance when it renews
breeder licenses every year.
Private
breeders, those that take care in what they
do and who they sell to, are not
licensed by the USDA.
As you know my position has always been that when someone has companion animals and they are
licensed, have parmanent ID, spayed and nuetered (unless you are an ethical
breeder), are well socialized and cared for and don't create a threat or a nuisance in the community then it is none of the goverment's business what or how many you have.
Some
breeders are exempt from
licensing because they don't have more than three breeding females and derive more than $ 500 in gross income from the resale of dogs.
don't just believe me,
do your own research look into commercial USDA inspected and
licensed dog
breeder facilities for yourself on Youtube.
By choosing USDA -
licensed breeders and by encouraging your friends and family to
do the same, you can be sure that your pets will have had a safe, healthy upbringing while also helping to push puppy mills out of business for good.
And revoking a
license is rare, sometimes taking years to complete, while a
breeder may continue to
do business.
GRCA opposes mandatory spay / neuter legislation because: 1) there is no evidence to suggest that it is effective in achieving its stated goal; 2) it causes well - documented health and developmental problems in some pets, especially when performed before sexual maturity; 3) it pushes responsible
breeders out of the
licensing system; 4) it reduces the availability of well - bred healthy, home bred and raised puppies; 5) it encourages the importation of puppies and dogs from less acceptable sources, including foreign countries; and 6) because laws that force owners to perform surgery on their pets without a rational basis for
doing so may be unconstitutional.
The objects of the Club shall be: (a) to encourage and promote quality in the breeding of purebred Great Danes and to
do all possible to bring their natural qualities to perfection; (b) to urge members and
breeders to accept the standard of the breed as approved by the American Kennel Club as the only standard of excellence by which Great Danes shall be judged; (c) to
do all in its power to protect and advance the interests of the breed by encouraging sportsmanlike competition at dog shows and obedience trials; (d) to conduct sanctioned and
licensed specialty shows and obedience trials under the rules and Regulations of the American Kennel Club.
Although AAS believes that sterilized dogs are happier and healthier, we can see by the huge proliferation of backyard breeding that
licensing fee differentials have
done nothing to discourage backyard
breeders, just responsible dog owners.
However, by
doing this, we need to realize that we contribute to the propagation of these
breeders, continually giving them
license to pump out litter after litter of unhealthy and / or unhygienic puppies or kittens.
If the dog turns out to be the
breeder's personal dog, every attempt will be made to return the dog to the
breeder intact, provided, however, that this
does not violate any county, state or local shelter
license requirements, restrictions, laws or regulations.
If these federally
licensed and registered
breeders, exhibitors, research facilities and horse show operators wanted an absolute right to privacy for all records, then they shouldn't have chosen to
do business in a regulated industry.
Our goals are to encourage and promote the breeding of pure - bred Golden Retrievers and to
do all possible to bring their natural qualities to perfection; to urge members and
breeders to accept the standard of the breed as approved by The American Kennel Club as the only standard of excellence by which Golden Retrievers shall be judged; to
do all in our power to protect and advance the interests of the breed by encouraging sportsmanlike competition at dog shows, obedience trials, agility trials, hunt tests and field trials; and to conduct sanctioned and
licensed specialty shows, obedience trials, agility trials, and field trials under the rules of The American Kennel Club.
But the act doesn't require all commercial
breeders to be
licensed, and the USDA establishes only minimum - care standards in enforcing this law.
If commercial
breeders were required to adhere to humane standards of care, or lose their
license if they don't, fewer families would unknowingly support cruel puppy mills or be duped into buying sick and behaviorally challenged puppies.
A
breeder (with or without a USDA
license) could still sell retail — directly to consumers through the Internet, classified ads, parking lots, by telephone, directly from the kennel, etc., which is what Kathy Bauck
did.
Are the
breeders USDA
licensed or
do they participate in any certification programs?
Across America, people shopping in pet stores are often told the puppies for sale don't come from puppy mills, but instead come from USDA -
licensed breeders.
AB 485 would remove the only remaining source of warrantied puppies from
licensed breeders and replace them with unaccountable suppliers that
do not have the type of dogs — puppies from specific breeds — that consumers want.
The Cook County measure
does allow for stores to sell pets from small, responsible,
licensed breeders with five or fewer breeding animals.
The law
does not extend to
licensed breeders who give their animals proper care, but it
does also ban the sale of animals under eight weeks old.
Unfortunately, 21 states have no laws on the books regulating commercial dog
breeders — and a number of states that
do require
breeders to be
licensed and inspected by the state only require commercial
breeders to meet USDA standards of care.
This exemption means that most non-commercial small or hobby
breeders do not have to be
licensed and regulated by the USDA.
They can either
do that, or obtain a
license, which would subject them to the same inspections as
breeders selling to pet stores.
AKC
does not
license breeders, but they
do inspect
breeders who sell AKC - registered litters.
At 11 a.m. on Feb. 3, Amanda Gossom of The HSUS's puppy mills campaign was
doing a routine part of her job, researching online inspection records for USDA -
licensed dog
breeders, when suddenly she hit a wall.
Commercial
breeders that sell directly to the public fall through the regulatory cracks unless they
do business in a state that
licenses commercial kennels.
Similarly, just because a dog
breeder is
licensed does not mean the
breeder is responsible or has the best interests of the animals in mind.
And even if you put a property tax on dogs you end up back at the original problem that nobody inspects the
breeders for how many dogs they had (if they
did the inhumane animal cruelty would have been caught), especially if they are not
licensed (the way around that would be to tax any dog owner).
The bill
does put in place essential
licensing requirements for high volume
breeders that sell directly to the public.
The federal USDA
does not, however, require
licensing of commercial
breeders that sell dogs directly to the public through newspaper ads or over the Internet.
The law
does say only 50 dogs per person, partnership, corporation, etc.; however, I'm sure there are ways
breeders will get around that — they'll
license their entire family, their neighbors, etc..
And no other criminal background, however violent, or even action taken against the
breeder or retailer for animal neglect or abuse that
did not result in a conviction, is sufficient to deny a
license.
However, this number
does not take into consideration the number of
breeders not required to be
licensed by the USDA or the number of
breeders operating illegally without a
license.
Many pet stores will say that they get their puppies from «
licensed USDA
breeders» but often pet stores use this to provide a false sense of security when in reality, they
do in fact get their puppies from puppy mills.