Sentences with phrase «lie by omission»

It means that you will not lie by omission, and that you will provide the relevant facts.

«lie by omission» is an interesting concept.

Is it a lie by omission to not give the amount of poison needed to kill the dog if not specifically asked?

A lie by omission is a lie none the less.

With all due respect, Richard Alley's public lecture has a defect that is very bad for the public and which amounts to a lie by omission.

1/9/17 — Lie by Omission It's a lie by omission.

In other campaigns, these same PR «think tanks» have shown a repeated tendency to lie by omission.

They won't lie by omission or fudge data.

Do you think He is lying by omission?

Cherry picking the scriptures is paramount to lies by omission.

Save East Greenbush, the resident group opposed to the casino on Thompson Hill Road, says the developers» presentation was filled with «lies by omission:» no mention of the pending lawsuit, controversial siting next to a Girl Scout Camp and high school, nothing about recent issues regarding Town Board support.

And so I felt like hiding the truth was lying by omission.

That's lying by omission, and it certainly fanned the rage of the Kindle community quite effectively.

Thomas @ 141 on denialists, spin merchants, and the PR industry of psyhological brain washing and the arts of lying by omission and sophistry.

Given the very well established history of lying by omission in fossil fuel industry propaganda, did they just pick three bodies out of about 60 or so that happened to have some record of warming, no matter how flimsy that warming record is?

Lying by omission (in the better cases), but still fundamentally fake.

You lied by omission Dano, not surprising considering your history.

THE WORKING GROUP CA N'T EXPLAIN WHAT CAUSES THE AMPLIFYING MECHANISM AND CHOOSES TO IGNORE IT; LYING BY OMISSION.

More lies by omission.

And yes, they do seem like «tricks,» like dirty - dealing — and frankly, even lies by omission — tricks you and Lewis went out of your way to pull off, all the while with the cheap rhetorical trick of saying you're using the same data as the IPCC 5AR.

That is what «whole truth» thing you are sworn is about it is to make it clear that lying by omission is also considered perjury.

: — LRB - They may be lying by omission but probably just plain ignorance, bad teachers and texts.

If you honestly feel that when someone asks you to be truthful about something, then you must either be lying, or lying by omission if you don't start your answer with the first instant of the big bang, your problem is not one of law.

No one would think I am lying by omission just because I don't tell people what the time is, accurate to the nanosecond, when they ask.

Am I lying by omission?

Deceit, lying by omission, and fabrications have no place in healthy relationships.

Commissioned selling is the breeding ground for misrepresentation, smooth story telling, lying by omission, lying by fabrication, manipulation of trusting, ignorant clients who are really marks, for the purposes of that next commission cheque, and for the slow, steady descent by too many initially honest sales people into the wagon rut of slippery dealings for payoffs... in short... corrupt behaviour, which by the way, is woefully dealt with by the in - house supposed police state.

Not exact matches

Their lies, even of omission, are unforgivable by man's laws — hopefully their repentance in private convinces God.

However, I am staunchly against her being lied to (by commission or omission!)

So, what are the lies of commission and omission by advocates of very low carb, ketogenic and zero carb diets we've exposed so far, over the last few weeks?

The really odd thing is that you've written on the need for teachers and researchers to partake in a PR effort to win broader public support (to counter the lies and omissions you see in reporting by corporate and mainstream media).

Asking direct questions will only result in lies — either directly, or by omission.

What matters is that scientists are fully honest, and don't lie either by omission or commission, as most of us used to believe.

It never occurred to me that the paper would would deliberately and repeatedly lie, both by commission and omission.

To keep a fact hidden that you know would allow a person to know that what you are saying is a lie is FRAUD BY OMISSION.

What is troublesome, as expressed by Willis Eschenbach, being deliberately lied to either by statements of omission or commission.

He's very bright, knows his stuff superlatively, but lies constantly by omission.

If you are not, then they're lying to you by omission on this issue, there may be many other important things they're not telling you that you are entitled to.

Additionally, lying (even by omission) can be grounds to have your legal status revoked.

Sometimes the essence of a claimant's case may lie in an alleged act or omission by the defendant which can not easily be described, at least in general terms, without recourse to language suggestive of fault: for instance, that «something had gone wrong» in the conduct of the claimant's medical operation, or that the accountant's advice was «flawed».