And when Lennart Bengtsson decides to join a right wing group of political and ideological hacks whose purpose is to spread disinformation and
lies about climate science, something that directly affects climate scientists and their research, and when the response to this public political decision and statement is massive criticisms and political decisions by other climate scientists, Judith Curry is complaining about these «attacks» and labels this «Climate McCarthyism».
However, the question whether they are spreading disinformation and
lies about climate science is something that is verifiable or falsifiable.
Jan P Perlwitz «Lennart Bengtsson decides to join a right wing group of political and ideological hacks whose purpose is to spread disinformation and
lies about climate science, something that directly affects climate scientists and their research, and the response is -LSB-...] massive criticisms by other climate scientists.»
Jan Perlwitz: However, the question whether they are spreading disinformation and
lies about climate science is something that is verifiable or falsifiable.
As we've seen again recently, the Mail is the source for many of
the lies about climate change that are reproduced in the Murdoch press [3].
But, since such a thing is unlikely, those of us who are speaking up need to not only speak up, but do so in such a manner as to leave no doubt where the lies and damned
lies about Climate Science come from and what the results of listening to them might be.
Perhaps you would care to explain exactly how these alleged «past exaggerations of climate predictions» compelled numerous GOP elected officials to deliberately and repeatedly
lie about climate science, while seeking to abuse their positions of authority to defund climate research and attack and destroy the careers of leading climate scientists.
Two representatives assert that ExxonMobil
lied about climate change data in the same way cigarette companies hid the real hazards associated with smoking, and they are now threatening a federal investigation.
For decades, the fossil - fuel industry has been underwriting a huge, successful campaign to
lie about climate change.
(I have held elsewhere that knowingly
lying about climate change in order to oppose renewable energy developments or in support of fossil fuels is the greatest crime in the history of humanity.
Mate, you are not just
lying about the climate; but started lying about me also.
It appears «
lying about climate change» does not pay nearly so well as Heartland claims.
During MSNBC's coverage of Hurricane Irma on Saturday, NextGen Climate founder Tom Steyer argued that politicians who take money from fossil fuel companies and
lie about climate change don't want to talk about climate change now because they have «enabled»
Don Blankenship, CEO of Massey Energy (NYSE: MEE) the fourth largest coal producer in the United States thinks Gore, Pelosi, Reid and environmentalists are crazy, atheist, communist Greeniacs who
lie about climate change and other environmental issues.
It could use the processes of discovery and cross-examination to expose plenty of examples of
lying about climate science on the part of politicians and government agencies.
That's for
lying about climate change.
Moreover, the Rose Garden speech President Bush delivered that day removed any doubt that the new Bush - Cheney White House had already begun to spin the big
lie about climate change, the lie we know so well we can recite it in our sleep: scientific uncertainties regarding global climate change are too great to make any policy decisions, especially those that might affect the US economy (read: the US fossil fuel - based energy economy).
Media Matters has a full list of GOPers caught on record
lying about the climate bill at their website.
All need to organize in their efforts to contact and communicate with the «experts» and media that are
lying about the climate engineering issue in order to hide it.
Not exact matches
For some months, ExxonMobil Inc. (xom) has been under investigation
about allegations that it
lied to investors
about the risks of
Climate Change.
Chair Schmidt argued ALEC was «literally
lying»
about climate.
New York attorney - general Eric Schneiderman is suing ExxonMobil for covering up its knowledge
about climate change and
lying to investors.
I think my question to those of you who couple atheism with evolution and
climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you
about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous
lie?
I think my question to those of you who couple evil atheism with evolution, the big bang, and
climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you
about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous
lie?
Children should be taught honestly what we know
about climate change, as well as what we don't know and where the uncertainties
lie.
Still, he noted,
climate negotiators are not generally experts in finance, and if nations are serious
about raising big bucks to protect low -
lying islands from sea level rise, to develop distributed solar generation or to do other much - needed work toward both mitigating emissions and building resilience against weather disasters, the conversation needs to shift.
The researchers had U.S. - based participants watch a video
about climate change occurring in the Republic of the Maldives, a chain of 26 low -
lying atolls in the Indian Ocean and one of the world's most vulnerable countries when it comes to
climate change.
An internationally recognized water and
climate change expert admitted yesterday that he
lied about his identity to obtain internal funding and strategy documents from the Heartland Institute.
To this kind of
lie, there is no effective reply other than to put out positive reliable information
about climate science.
Cuccinelli cites the Kremlin organ RIA Novosti to «prove» that western
climate scientists are
LYING about global warming, but during the 2010 forest fires, Andrei Areshev, a lunatic attached to a Russian Foreign Ministry drunk tank, even claimed right in this same RIA Novosti that those sneaky U.S.
climate scientists were CAUSING global warming by beaming secret
climate weapons at Russia!
These highlands are blessed with an ideal
climate perfect for playing golf on a tropical island full of
lies about pesona.Lokasi power 66 kilometers from the international airport Ngurah Rai, Bali, surrounded by tropical forest and embellished with views of the lake Buyan.
The question for Phillips de Pury is whether their problems
lie in having moved to high up the price ladder for the new economic
climate or whether their consignors were less flexible
about reserves.
«John Fitzsimons's latest exhibition, entitled «Projections», takes a darker and more foreboding turn than his previous work to date, reflecting the current international political
climate and associated nervousness
about the path that
lies ahead.
«
Climate scientists are all a bunch of alarmists who
lie about the situation and destroy data».
You
lie repeatedly
about the science and make no effort to learn
about statistics or
climate science.
As opposed to the
lies which are happening 24/7/365 as the world keeps spinning on it's axis flooded by the distortions, the gross disinformation and the delusional illogical commentaries by fools and idiots regarding AGW / CC science with their wild eyed conspiracy theories that
climate science is a massive deceptive fraud upon the whole world to bring
about a one world totalitarian government by mad leftie environmentalists and hippie anarchists high on mushies.
This administration's refusal to constructively address the urgent issue of
climate change amounts a lot more to a «high crime» than Clinton's
lying about a sexual dalliance.
It's become fashionable for sources like Breitbart and their ilk to smear NOAA or NASA or both for «
lying»
about climate change, but when you read the pieces critically, it invariably turns out that the charges are completely unsupported.
Upset that you had to eat your words
about lies spun by many
climate skeptics?
These problems, including that of
climate change, require efforts to find solutions in all sectors of society and that we engage in diverse and dynamic dialogue
about potential solutions, including those that may
lie far outside the current mainstream.
But let them
lie in the future
about c02 levels and
climate change issues, then those
LIES will be criminal.
After Google chairman Eric Schmidt accused ALEC of «literally
lying»
about climate change on NPR in September 2014, a fleet of companies ditched ALEC, from oil giants like BP and Occidental Petroleum to software and tech firms like Facebook, Yelp, Yahoo, AOL, eBay, and SAP — the company which chaired ALEC's corporate board.
But he
lies to us
about Climate Change and the threats to the world so I don't trust him.
I'm the one quoting from the AMS Compendium of Meteorology documenting your
lies about the history of your CatastrophicAGW - by - CO2
climate cult religion.
It seems that, not content with having
lied to us
about shrinking glaciers, increasing hurricanes, and rising sea levels, the IPCC's latest assessment report also told us a complete load of porkies
about the danger posed by
climate change to the Amazon rainforest.
My focus is on the accusation that skeptic
climate scientists are paid fossil fuel industry money to
lie about the issue to the public.
Accusations of corrupt fossil fuel industry influence over skeptic
climate scientists are irrelevant material — worthless — in the absence of any physical evidence (full context document scans, undercover video / audio transcripts, leaked emails, money - transfer receipts) proving such skeptics were paid and orchestrated to
lie about the certainty of catastrophic man - caused global warming.
So Eldon, The CRU
lied about warming, NASA
lied about warming, IPCC
lied about warming, Nature did too, Real
Climate kept up the
lie and fed «Journalists» misinformation (which they stuffed their bellies with as though it were a last meal), and they all tried their level best to discredit Steve at every opportunity on a personal and professional level, but Steve should be upbraided for not being nicer while they did it.
Am I
lying when I relate that he was caught on camera smugly boasting
about publishing the personal contact information (phone, emails) and employer contact information for mainstream
climate scientists like Ben Santer and Katharine Hayhoe, urging not only his readers but Rush Limbaugh listeners to harass them and write to the institutions that employed them demanding that they be fired?
This simple analysis lends itself perfectly to the accusation
about skeptic
climate scientists being paid industry money to
lie and misinform.