Sentences with phrase «lieu of notice required»

There are a number of legal issues to consider, including whether there are sufficient circumstances to prove just cause, the effect of any employment agreement, and the amount of notice of termination or pay in lieu of notice required by the Employment Standards Act, 2000 and the common law.

Not exact matches

Absent a serious fault (in Quebec) or just cause for dismissal, minimum statutory written notice or pay in lieu of notice, is required for every terminated employee with more than three consecutive months (in British Columbia and Quebec), or three months (in Ontario and Alberta) of service on a scale increasing with service up to at least eight weeks of notice.

The ESA requires only that the employer provides notice of termination or pay in lieu of notice to the employee and, if the employee is eligible, severance pay.

All pay in lieu of notice will be subject to all required tax withholdings and statutory deductions.

An employee who is terminated without cause is not required to mitigate his or her loss when his or her employment contract specifies a fixed term of notice or pay in lieu and the employment contract is silent with respect to mitigation.

Where notice is not given, the employer is required to pay damages in lieu of notice, but that requirement is subject to the employee making a reasonable effort to mitigate the damages by seeking an alternate source of income.

The Court of Appeal held that failure to sign did not constitute grounds for dismissal and if the employer wished to dismiss its employees who refused to sign, pay in lieu of reasonable notice was required.

Her employment was governed by a written contract, which stated that she would be required to complete a six month probationary period, and that, at any time, she could be dismissed for cause without notice or pay in lieu of notice.

The employer did not provide any notice or pay in lieu of notice in reliance on a probationary clause in Mr. Ly's offer of employment which read, in its entirety, that «[e] mployees are required to serve an initial probationary period of six (6) months for new positions».

The fact that the court may sometimes require an employee to receive his pay in lieu of notice as a continuation of salary, as happened in the Markoulakis case, highlights an important takeaway for employees.

In most cases, 30 days» notice or 30 days» pay in lieu of notification is required.

She was paid approximately $ 45,690, representing eight weeks statutory pay in lieu of notice and the minimum severance pay required under the Employment Standards Act.

The Court rejected the appellant's reliance on the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Roden v. Toronto Humane Society.12 In Roden the Court enforced a contract that provided the employee would be provided with the minimum amount of notice «or payment in lieu thereof as required by the applicable employment standards legislation.»

With respect to entitlement on termination of employment, the employment contract provided as follows for a without - cause termination: Regular employees may be terminated at any time without cause upon being given the minimum period of notice prescribed by applicable legislation, or by being paid salary in lieu of such notice of as may otherwise be required by applicable legislation.

Recourse of failure to provide notice requirements for group termination in addition to any individual notice of termination or payment of severance in lieu thereof required to be given under the Act will also be amended.

The employer argued the total amount of notice and pay in lieu of notice that he had provided exceeded the statutory notice and severance requirements and he was not required to pay any additional amount.

At trial, the judge held the contract of employment had not been frustrated due to the employee's failure to obtain the legally required licence, and the casino was obligated to provide pay in lieu of notice of dismissal.

Employers often offer less pay in lieu of notice than the courts would require them to.

Where there is just cause, termination, no notice, or payment in lieu of notice is required.

Currently, where an employee provides more notice than required and an employer wants to pay out the employee, the employer must provide pay in lieu to the end of the termination notice period that the employer would have been required to give the employee.

The «narrow Norton Tool principle» was that it is good IR practice to pay in lieu of notice in full, not requiring the employee to give credit for any alternative earnings during the notice period.

If you request to be on our mailing list or register for one of our educational programs we may use your email address to send you related notices (including any notices required by law, in lieu of communication by postal mail).