One year's pay in
lieu of reasonable notice for an employee of two and a half years of service was significant progress for Mr. Dunsmuir but the legal analysis was difficult to accept.
Although at present this decision is somewhat of an outlier, employers should be aware that damages in
lieu of reasonable notice for long - service employees — particularly those in supervisory roles whose age and specialization may make alternative employment harder to find — could exceed the traditional 24 - month «ceiling».
Not exact matches
For example, if an employment contract provides for less than the statutory minimum entitlements that result from terminating employment, then the employer will become liable for payment in lieu of reasonable termination notice at common law — often far exceeding the statutory minimu
For example, if an employment contract provides
for less than the statutory minimum entitlements that result from terminating employment, then the employer will become liable for payment in lieu of reasonable termination notice at common law — often far exceeding the statutory minimu
for less than the statutory minimum entitlements that result from terminating employment, then the employer will become liable
for payment in lieu of reasonable termination notice at common law — often far exceeding the statutory minimu
for payment in
lieu of reasonable termination
notice at common law — often far exceeding the statutory minimums.
At trial, the employee sought remedies
for wrongful dismissal, including damages
for reasonable pay in
lieu of notice.
At trial, the plaintiff sought pay in
lieu of common law «
reasonable notice» and argued that his written contract was unenforceable
for two reasons: the contract allowed
for termination without
notice in case
of «continuing incapacity considered permanent» (based on legislation that was later amended) and allowed
for termination on only 15 days»
notice even though his service at the time entitled him to much more than 15 days»
notice under the ESA.
(1) A fixed term
of notice or payment in
lieu is not equivalent to common law damages
for reasonable notice (the parties negotiated something different);
The Court
of Appeal held that failure to sign did not constitute grounds
for dismissal and if the employer wished to dismiss its employees who refused to sign, pay in
lieu of reasonable notice was required.
It confirms that the court can grant judgment prior to the expiry
of the
reasonable notice period - as in this case, the court awarded 17 months
of pay in
lieu of reasonable, despite the fact that Mr. Paquette had only been out
of work
for 7 months at the time.
The British Columbia Supreme Court recently ruled against the plaintiffs in an action
for pay in
lieu of reasonable notice due to the plaintiffs» failure to establish that they met their duty to mitigate.
The majority stressed that the right to terminate on
reasonable notice is an implied term — and not the breach —
of an employment agreement, and therefore payment in
lieu of notice is not damages
for breach
of contract, but is part
of the compensation contemplated by the contract.
However, if your employment is terminated
for no reason, your termination is said to be «wrongful», and as such, you are entitled to what is known as a
reasonable notice period or payment in
lieu of notice.