Sentences with phrase «life child policy»

I purchase sahara life child policy plan.

I purchase shriram life child policy plan from shriram life insurance.

I purchase aegon life child policy plan.

The best aegon life child policy plan and the plan is awesome.

My aegon life child policy plan is very good and the insurer is aegon religare life insurance.

I had reliance life child policy plan for my child.

Not exact matches

Parenting will always be a challenge in the life of any ambitious entrepreneur and / or business leader, and there are many ways to raise a child: with hired help, with the support of extended family or working for a company with generous family policies that allow for flexible work hours and parental leave.

Additionally, China's one child per family social policy creates its own set of circumstances, including larger extended families that live together, and that dote on the youngest member of the family.

CBA is seen as a stable part of life in the country of 24 million where most people have had a mortgage, insurance policy or regular savings account with CBA at some point - often starting with its famed «Dollarmites» deposit account for school children.

Hyde says a will or life insurance policy should never name a minor child as a direct beneficiary.

Feeley went on to criticize many of Trump's signature national - security and foreign policies, including the travel ban, plans to build a wall along the US - Mexico border, decision to end legal protections for the children of people living in the US illegally, and withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement and the Trans - Pacific Partnership.

Considering the high costs of having of a child, coupled with the tension in balancing family - work life matters, states and companies are starting to invest in family support policies, parental benefits and competitive education.

While McDonald's pretends to be «giving back,» it continues to lobby against policies to reduce junk food marketing to children and refuses to pay its workers a living wage, despite growing protests.

«The living wage can be achieved by employers paying more wages or by policy interventions that reduce expenses for people,» he said, adding a community child care plan similar to Quebec's could help further reduce the living wage by $ 3.22 an hour, making it more affordable for employers.

Low fertility, the one - child policy and the cost of raising children in a system without adequate maternity facilities have all caused the birth rate to fall just as more old people are living longer.

As an employer, the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals offers eligible employees an excellent compensation and benefits package that includes federal insurance plans, life insurance coverage, leave policies, thrift - savings plans, transit and child - care subsidies, training and development, and work flexibility.

Another example would be a young widow with small children receiving a lump - sum settlement from her husband's life insurance policy and can not risk losing the principal; although growth would be nice, the need for cash in hand for living expenses is of primary importance.

With unflinching determination she has relentlessly pursued policies that would improve the lives of children and youth in the care of the province.

Specific policies include the 30 - 50 Plan to Fight Poverty, which is committed to reducing the number of people living below the poverty line by 30 percent and the number of children by 50 percent; an Affordable Housing Plan; pursing the long - term goal of a national high - quality, universal, community - based, early education and child care system; increasing the Guaranteed Income Supplement by $ 600 per year for low - income seniors; and creating a new relationship with Canada's First Nation, Inuit and Métis peoples, including re-instating the Kelowna Accord.

A whole life insurance policy may be purchased to supplement term life insurance to cover final expenses, protect a special needs child, or to provide tax advantages for large estates.

For example, parents may want to gift to a child via a large life insurance policy, but they hold back out of fear that the death benefit might reduce the child's motivation to pursue a degree or build a career.

According to the new policy, under certain circumstances, terminally ill children would be allowed to request that doctors intentionally end their lives.

This year, Hillary Clinton has better policy proposals to help improve the lives of women, children, and families than Donald Trump, whose pro-life convictions are lukewarm at best, and whose mass deportation plan would rip hundreds of thousands of families apart, whose contempt for Latinos, Muslims, refugees and people with disabilities would further marginalized the «least of these» among us, and whose support for torture and targeting civilians in war call into question whether Christians who support him are truly pro-life or simply anti-abortion.

Mintz concludes that the psychological cost to children has steadily grown more apparent, and he makes the familiar array of policy recommendations: more widely available health care, education reform, subsidized high - quality child care, family - friendly employment policies, a living wage, a limited work week and economic support to the impoverished.

Whatever legal and public policy solutions are reached in the coming years, Christians need to find a social, political and religious way to secure the well - being of women and children, involve fathers in the lives of their children, and support gays and lesbians who want to establish committed relationships and receive the benefits and blessings that go with this commitment.

I had a pretty good life insurance policy (which I couldn't pay for any more), and seriously considered how I could kill myself while making it look like an accident so that I could provide for my wife and three children.

The Right has no worry as to what devastation their policies will cause... their money insulates them from crisis, from illness (need of healthcare),,,, as one blogger who went to the convention said... their lives will not change at all, they will go to the same country clubs, their children will attend the same ivy league schools, they have money for all necessities, etc..

Meanwhile, China reaches deep into the family lives of its citizens: Its «family planning» policies, including forced abortions, have brought about the world's highest number of deaths of unborn children.

This simply means that protecting children becomes a «way of life» for the Christian community, not something to be put back on the shelf once a policy has been adopted.

Cares enormously about children in resettlement camps, who must drink water to fill their stomachs because there is no food; he cares about shivering women at Nyanga whose flimsy plastic shelters are being destroyed by police; He cares that the influx control system together with Bantunization are destroying black family life not accidentally but by deliberate government policy; He cares that people die mysteriously in detention; He cares that something horrible is happening in this country when a man will often mow down his family before turning the gun on himself; He cares that life seems so dirt cheap (cited in Maimela 1986:43).

Realizing that such an award would be rejected out of hand by a judge, Sparks moderated her demand, and Payton agreed to contribute $ 5,550 a month in child support, establish a $ 175,000 college trust fund and purchase a $ 1 million life insurance policy naming the child as beneficiary.

and undermining the much - needed potential of the SPL policy to provide space for fathers to play a more equal role in caregiving in the precious early months of their children's lives.

«The Alliance for Childhood promotes policies and practices that support children's healthy development, love of learning, and joy in living.»

In our paper Addressing Fatherlessness: how Government can strengthen the active presence of fathers in their children's lives, we outline the key policy reforms politicians should be making to tackle fatherlessness.

However, when it comes to child protection, routine engagement with fathers and father - figures has seemed a distant ideal: safeguarding policy has repeatedly failed to identify this as an issue despite the fact that Serious Case Reviews over a twenty year period (most recently the Ofsted Serious Case Review summary of 46 cases, as well as both of the Baby Peter Serious Case Reviews) have found failure by practitioners to engage with the men in children's lives to be a major factor in child abuse and deaths.

The aim is to produce in - depth knowledge about the life chances of young fathers and their children for professional practice and policy by using qualitative longitudinal research methods.

In Fatherhood: Parenting Programmes and Policies — A Critical Review of Best Practice, Fiona McAllister and Adrienne Burgess from the Fatherhood Institute review policies and programmes that promote or facilitate the involvement of fathers and father - figures from the pre-natal period through the first eight years of their children'Policies — A Critical Review of Best Practice, Fiona McAllister and Adrienne Burgess from the Fatherhood Institute review policies and programmes that promote or facilitate the involvement of fathers and father - figures from the pre-natal period through the first eight years of their children'policies and programmes that promote or facilitate the involvement of fathers and father - figures from the pre-natal period through the first eight years of their children's lives.

The most influential developmental scientist of modern times, Urie Bronfenbrenner, said that the degree to which parents can affect their children's development depends in large part on the more remote forces in their environment — the culture and policies that are the «blueprint» for all the other forces in children's lives.

Predicting early fatherhood and whether young fathers live with their children: prospective findings and policy reconsiderations.

The finding that parental separation (and also being born to parents who have never lived together) poses a risk to the quality of both parents» relationships with their children should increase the urgency of developing policies to support these families.

News, research, policy and practice articles on working with separated families, and maximising the involvement of fathers in the lives of their children post-separation.

The benefit of father involvement in children's lives is already strongly represented in policy:

It's a great thing, but, as he notes, «Because fathers demand a greater involvement in their children's lives after separation, there has been increasing conflict both at a policy level and at the individual level of litigated cases.»

Caroline Waters, Director, People and Policy at BT: «We recognise that dads have family responsibilities and increasingly want a greater role in the lives of their children.

Canada's infant and young child nutrition policy recommends that mothers exclusively breastfeed their children for the first six months of life and continue breastfeeding to two years while gradually adding high nutrient and energy dense complementary foods.

«As the cornerstone of any comprehensive policy designed to improve the health and well - being of childbearing women and their children, breastfeeding can save lives and improve long - term health of the entire community,» the document states.

Canada's infant and young child feeding policy recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life and sustained breastfeeding for two years and beyond.

However, I'd be much more willing to overlook something like the candy reward for a great grade (as misguided and repulsive as I think it is), than to overlook a daily snack policy that so clearly impacts every child's day - to - day life.

The conspiracy theorist living inside my brain says we can expect to see more of this type of «journalism», followed by calls on the school officials to DO SOMETHING because IT IS FOR THE CHILDREN»S SAFETY and IF WE LET THE PARENTS SEND LUNCHES TO SCHOOL THEN CHILDREN WILL DIE!!!!!!!! (note the many, many exclamation points — that means this is a REALLY IMPORTANT POINT Y ’ ALL), followed by local school officials implementing policies to BAN CHILDREN FROM EATING FOOD BROUGHT IN FROM «OUTSIDE» and mandate that they eat, instead, the lunch provided by the school.

The people who created this policy are criminals who have absolutely no regard for the lives of women and children.