The presence of plate tectonic activity could have important implications for the possibility of
life in the ocean thought to exist beneath the moon's surface.
Not exact matches
There is no way
in Hell (which there is one) you can convince any logical
thinking person (myself included) that my ancestors crawled out of the
ocean and somehow magically grew arms and legs from nothing and decided to
live on land just «because».
A presence that disturbs... with the joy Of elevated
thoughts; a sense sublime Of something far more deeply interfused, Whose dwelling is the light of setting suns, And the round
ocean and the
living air, And the blue sky, and
in the mind of man:..
... I have felt A presence that disturbs me with the joy Of elevated
thoughts; a sense sublime Of something far more deeply interfused, Whose dwelling is the light of setting suns, And the round
ocean and the
living air, And the blue sky, and
in the mind of man; A motion and a spirit, that impels All
thinking things, all objects of all
thought, And rolls through all things.
Things weren't necessarily going the way that I
thought they should go... and we certainly weren't
in a place much above scraping the bottom... but somehow,
in that moment, I found a little bit of hope and, like a
life raft
in the middle of a stormy
ocean, I clung to that little piece of hope because it was all it seemed like I had to hold onto.
Overall, the animations will help stewards of
ocean life think about underwater sound
in three dimensions, says Greg Silber, coordinator of recovery activities for endangered large whales at the National Marine Fisheries Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
We don't usually
think of our daily activities as affecting
life two miles deep
in the
ocean.»
While Mars has long been the darling of NASA's robotic exploration efforts,
in December astronomers revealed the first evidence that Europa is venting plumes of vapour into space — probably fed by the seemingly
life - friendly
ocean we
think is present under the ice.
Only once the ice begins to melt each summer does
life begin to bloom
in the nutrient - rich waters of the Arctic
Ocean — or so scientists have
thought.
Although
ocean worlds are swimming
in what is
thought to be a key ingredient for
life — water — their lack of land may limit how much of it they can host.
They are also
thought to have helped aerate ancient seas, boosting
life in the
oceans some 750 million years ago.
Grassle
thought it was a splendid idea, as long as it didn't get diverted into something strictly utilitarian — a census of seafood — and as long as it included all the other things that
lived in the
ocean, including obscure but biologically important organisms like polychaetes.
But it would have been nice to hear the authors»
thoughts on recent Japanese proposals to attempt to bioengineer even more productive
living coral reefs and plant them
in the Pacific to increase the power of the
oceans to absorb carbon.
Beneath its icy shell, Jupiter's moon is
thought to host a deep, salty
ocean that could be one of the best places to look for
life in the solar system.
Pluto is
thought to possess a subsurface
ocean, which is not so much a sign of water as it is a tremendous clue that other dwarf planets
in deep space also may contain similarly exotic
oceans, naturally leading to the question of
life, said one co-investigator with NASA's New Horizon mission to Pluto and the Kuiper Belt.
Conditions
in its subsurface global water
ocean are
thought to be similar to those deep
in Earth's
oceans, where a wide variety of
life thrives.
Some of the major theories about the reason behind this cosmic silence say that
life is either rarer than we
thought, that alien
life is trapped
in deep
oceans, or that we're just not scanning
in the right radio frequencies.
Up until this time, it was
thought that organisms
living in the deep sea depended on a constant «rain» of food from above, i.e. from the lighted regions of the
ocean.
The bottom of the
ocean is also
thought to be
in contact with the rocky core, similar to on Earth, which could provide chemical nutrients to any possible
life forms.
Some astrobiologists
think that if
life will develop elsewhere
in the solar system, it will be near vents at the bottom of Europa's
ocean.
The pop - up shop, Package Free, will
live in Williamsburg from May 1 to July, stocking eco-friendly alternatives to any single - use item you can
think of: reusable tote bags, compostable toothbrushes, refillable dental floss, natural beauty products
in bulk, even skateboards made from
ocean plastic.
He's never seen the
ocean, and it's supposed to be nice
in Pensacola (where my mom
lives), so we're
thinking about heading down that way for a couple of days.
Between hiking volcanos and canyoning to fishing
in the
ocean and
living in a tree house, I
think it's safe to say that time and WIFI were nowhere to be found
in this adventure.
It would seem that the world's
ocean is a
living and
thinking entity, able to project the people
in the space - station's dreams into reality.
Critical
thinking, problem solving, experimentation, learning about the universe, the
oceans, microbes and, just the world
in which we
live...
To
think that we grasp the fullness of
life is to say that by holding a mere drop of water
in our hands we are able to understand the immensity of the
ocean.
Now with the Giant Tortoise you would be forgiven for
thinking I was
in the Galapagos Islands but
in fact I was
in the Seychelles, a group of islands smack bang
in the middle of the Indian
Ocean equally renowned for their beauty and wild
life.
That was cordoned off
in the
living room area, so it was freezing overnight, but I
think that's what you get with Apollo Bay and the Great
Ocean Road
in generally, so choose carefully.
This also means that they're nearly impossible to filter out at wastewater plants and most end up
in the
ocean, to the detriment of marine
life — and ultimately, inside humans, too, as a third of our food is
thought to be contaminated by these plastic microfibers.
The thing is that for the World
Ocean to rise any significant amount then it would need all the frozen fresh water to melt, and even though the fear mongers keep saying this is happening, its not, JP Lovecraft was the flag bearer of the CAGW movement, he coined the word Gaia, he said that mankind would only be able to breed
in those areas of the warm arctic and Antarctic, the rest of us would be dead, he said that and many other scaremongering things but close to the end of his
life then he recanted it all, he said that «enough time had passed had passed for the models to be proved correct, and that all that the passing of time had proved was that all the models were not correct» me I
think that he did not want to die with his horses still hitched to this faulty wagon.
But I
think fertilizing vast sterile
ocean with iron and creating more food for
ocean life [and consequently more food from humans] is a better way to go - you using CO2 for a good purpose rather just storing somewhere - and storing CO2
in gas / ice form has some possibility being suddenly released some way, whereas CO2
in skeleton of tiny creatures most likely ends up as limestone.
When we
think of the
ocean, we may
think of its power, its wave and the magnificent creatures
living it
in.
To point out just a couple of things: —
oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that
oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside
oceans, so no latent heat) or
oceans begin to release heat but
in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that
in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while
oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but,
in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part
in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured
in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity
in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase
in UHI effect, but I
think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply
live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI
in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but,
in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least
in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough
in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
As these SRM techniques are also largely unproven, require a mostly peaceful world to be deployed
in, require the bending of judiciary systems, may backfire climatologically and do «nothing» [considering
ocean temperature feedbacks they actually do do something] to abate
ocean acidification — the simple notion that it is cheap [again, policy
thinking] makes geoengineering so dangerous, possibly undermining cooperation behind the world's mitigation attempts, under the UNFCCC, the hard route that we need to go anyway * [as CDR geoengineering lacks the potential to get carbon concentrations back to safe levels, also for marine
life — and isn't much cheaper / is costlier anyway].
Here is a finding from last year that does indicate that deep
ocean temperatures are indeed rising: http://www.physsci.uci.edu/psnews/?id=159 but it is curious to take reassurance
in the
thought that 10 ft under the
ocean surface everything is fine when we don't
live there.
And using the
oceans as a sink causes acidification that scientists now
think may cause the most rapid and disruptive change to
life in the seas since catastrophic events tens of millions of years ago (see
Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide, Royal Society, August 2005 and The other CO2 problem, New Scientist, August 2006).
He's never seen the
ocean, and it's supposed to be nice
in Pensacola (where my mom
lives), so we're
thinking about heading down that way for a couple of days.