Sentences with phrase «life issues right»

Both writers, however, look tough end - of - life issues right in the eye and, with intelligence and sensitivity, invite their readers to do the same.

Not exact matches

The EU wants to agree first on the U.K.'s financial and budgetary liabilities — the so - called Brexit Bill — as well as finding a mutually agreeable resolution to the issue of the Irish border, and some concrete confirmation of the future rights for EU citizens» living in the U.K.
For instance, if you're seeking help with a broad range of financial issues, ranging from how to invest or fine - tune your tax planning to choosing the right amount of life or disability insurance or ensuring that your estate plan matches your desires, I would say that your best bet is to find a certified financial planner.
The ads covered a wide range of hot - button political issues, including the Black Lives Matter movement, LGBT rights, immigration, and gun rights.
The word «iconic» gets thrown around a lot, but it was the right word for the cover of LIFE magazine's August 15, 1969 issue.
«I am hoping that once elections are out of the way, we will be able to solve these issues,» he added referring to the rights of EU citizens who already live in the U.K.
The bottom line appears to be that the United Nations was unable to find a real life woman that would be able to champion the rights of ALL women on the issue of gender equality and the fight for their empowerment.The United Nations has decided that Wonder Woman is the role model that women and girls all round the world should look up to.
All three women are on Fortune's list of 34 Leaders Who Are Changing Health Care, which is live online (love to say that) on Fortune.com right spanking now — and which appears in full analog glory in our May 1 issue, speeding to mailboxes and newsstands this moment.
Not having chicken available is a big issue, but it's not a life - threatening issue, and the company applied the right amount of humor to the situation.
Life sometimes brings big issues that have to be dealt with right away.
Ambrose's description of the matter as a «political issue» has it about right — not only in terms of potential hypocrisy, but as a possible suggestion of personal extravagance, the great sin of political life.
I can not believe the ignorance and bias on this with Statistics Canada - I mean come on people lets get with the times - you are operating a Statistical agency like we are living in the 1950's - this is indeed the 21st century - income polarization is a massive issue, and to report on income like the manner that this article did is just out right garbage!!
When two people live in a committed relationship for decades and some hospital functionary bars one from visiting the other in the hospital because they can't marry and hence are technically unrelated in the eyes of the law, that is a civil rights issue.
These atheist comedians are like dogs that can lead us right to the good stuff — the issues we really need to research in order to cultivate healthy spiritual lives.
Perhaps with enough people hammering the issues of abortion and gay marriage, Harris is right to direct her attention and effort to other issues of mercy and justice, but the flavor of the book seems to downplay the importance of traditional marriage, infant life, and the church's role in mercy ministry.
The issue is not a «right to life» issue, it is not a religious issue, it is a women's health and civil rights issue - period.
Life and death decisions are not issues of a woman's right to «choose».
But now those are already there at yours maybe if you prepare them right as to education and training for finally deputing them to return to their own countries with the needful backup and authority they will be useful tools for the advancement and prosperity of their nations then you will have no one wanting to immigrate leaving behind their own families and friends... in addition to that you will see those who immigrated towards your country start moving back to their own countries and this is the only solution to resolve the issue of illegal immigration and to find peace... otherwise if things go on as it is today surely slowly slowly you will find that your own countries become inherited by piling up immigrants who might get starved due negligence turn on against the Host country... that has contributed in the destructions of their countries but not towards and advancements or developments of their countries and nations to find peace and make a living..!?
With courts increasingly willing to nullify popular legislation and proclaim new rights, legislators are encouraged to avoid their responsibility for tackling controversial issues; interest groups are encouraged to take their cases to the courts rather than to try to persuade their fellow citizens; and citizens get the feeling that they have no say in setting the conditions under which they live, work, and raise their children.
If abortion and related life issues are in fact the great civil - rights issues of our time» in that they test whether the state may arbitrarily deny the protection of the law to certain members of the human community» then Griswold eventually led to a situation in which the Democratic and Republican positions on civil rights flipped, with members of today's Democratic party playing the role that its Southern intransigents played during the glory days of the American civil - rights movement.
On the other, atheists would argue that a world directly guided by reason and evidence is more effective in addressing both general and specific issues affecting the rights and quality of life of individuals and societies.
And then I recognized that my academic language of distancing analysis and explanation also served to obfuscate the clear moral dimensions of life and the need to choose between right and wrong, and that on some issues analysis or explanation is itself a form of collusion.
I allow myself, by my observer standpoint and scholarly method, to absent myself from any confrontation either in my teaching or in my life with the pressing issues of right and wrong.
However, these issues start with the disadvantage (for their proponents) of trying to overcome the bulwark of human rights laws which, since the end of the Second World War, have increasingly placed duties on nations to protect life and to outlaw any deliberate deprivation of life.
The church tries to get around the issue by attempting to somehow separate the individual from who they are and thereby maintain the right to openly condemn them and / or seek to impose a life of celibacy and deny them the same rights of love, marriage, and family they themselves enjoy.
He said: «It's very significant because usually pope's do not comment on individual situations although their statements on life, right to life and bioethics issues have been very strong in the past.
After three years of married life, a Daddy - like dude came into my life which brought every single Daddy issue I had right back up to surface level.
Will traditional marriage follow the path of preborn life — an issue moving from judicial activism and socially elite proclamations that a generational shift was «inevitable» and «the debate is over» to our day decades later where the youngsters are more right minded about abortion than their parents.
The pro-life group Ohio Right to Life had been fighting for the law, and issued a statement on Friday that said,
Forty - five leading pro-life advocates, including Gary Bauer of the Family Research Council, James Dobson of Focus on the Family, Clarke Forsythe of Americans United for Life, Wanda Franz of the National Right to Life Committee, and Ralph Reed of the Christian Coalition, signed a much heralded joint «Statement of Pro-Life Principle and Concern» published in First Things in 1996 in which the primary legal complaint was made that Roe «wounded American democracy» by removing the issue of abortion from «democratic concern.»
The issue of protecting the basic rights of persons from hostile or indifferent state governments was constitutionally resolved almost one hundred and fifty years ago in the Fourteenth Amendment, purchased with the blood of hundreds of thousands of American lives in the awful crucible of the Civil War.
It is, I think, necessary to question what it takes for one to stand truly equal among one's fellows; to explore the limits of a rights - oriented approach to the problem of inequality between racially distinct populations in our contemporary national life; to deal with issues of dignity, shame, personal responsibility, character and values, deservingness.
As for the «narrow public witness» against which John Murdock rightly cautions, I really don't think «prioritizing» equals «ignoring,» such that to prioritize the defense of religious freedom and the right to life excludes other issues from the Church's social witness and public policy advocacy.
Since the State considers them human babies as well... it is a human rights issue for the right for the baby to live.
American Catholics back Pope's downplaying of contentious social issues... because American Catholics believe that that it is RIGHT TO BE FREE to live according to one's own «rights»... and this belief confesses that it is RIGHT TO BE FREE to worship any «god»... and Jorge Bergoglio has declared that this «FREEDOM» IS RIGHT.
The issue is not property rights, but the enemy's eternal life.
This is a complex and not easily definable issue and anyone with «easy» answers in my view is not admitting the fallen and terrible condition of mankind in general and that as much as we would attempt to make categorical statements as to «all war is wrong» or «war is the right soultion» we are making statements that just cant stand up to either biblical exegesis or the reality of the world we live in.
Other issues fought for are democracy, life within a community, the respect and recognition of the basic human rights of immigrants and refugees.
Psychosis / most psychiatric illnesses often arise in adolescence or in early adult life however 75 per cent of children with mental health disorders / issues do not get the help they need — I fell into that 75 per cent, I was misdiagnosed by a doctor and then the self - induced trance - like altered state of consciousness induced by intense / deep meditation and prayer coupled with the theology about how prayer and God work in a Christian's life (more on this below) just pushed me right over the edge.
For what drives the litigation for gay rights is the need to have the gay life recognized and confirmed in principle in every setting in which the issue may arise.
Take them one at a time, spending as much time as you need to discuss thoroughly the issues and feelings that arise: «The ideas and issues which excite me most are...;» «The things that are most worth living for right now are...;» «I feel the most joy (pain, hope, lonely, together) when...;» «What I really believe about God is...;» «I feel closest to (most distant from) God when...;» «I get spiritually high when...;» «The beliefs that mean the most to me now are...;» «The beliefs from my childhood which no longer make sense are...;» «Life has the least (the most) meaning for me when...;» «I feel closest to you (most distant from you) spiritually when...;» «The way I really feel about the church is...;» «I'd like to do the following, to enjoy more spiritual sharing...;» «To enrich the spiritual life of our family, I'd like Life has the least (the most) meaning for me when...;» «I feel closest to you (most distant from you) spiritually when...;» «The way I really feel about the church is...;» «I'd like to do the following, to enjoy more spiritual sharing...;» «To enrich the spiritual life of our family, I'd like life of our family, I'd like to..
The NATO essay points again to the fact that, whether the issue under discussion is welfare policy or foreign policy, what we consistently find in the work of Irving Kristol is a consideration of public life and governing from the standpoint of the individual soul» and, by the same token, a consideration of the need to foster the right kinds of virtues in individual souls in order for the most desirable regimes to be successful.
In the early days bioethics focused on such larger issues, but the field was in time overtaken by an interest in what can be called regulatory bioethics: the protection of research subjects, the advancement of patient rights, and the devising of procedural guidelines for end - of - life care, for instance.
Thus the «right to die» campaign was able to represent the issue as a general referendum «on getting government out of this important personal decision,» and «on returning control of end of life decisions to where it belongs - with the dying person.»
It is not an issue of tolerance [as both sides are arrogant] but of the right to exist for one's own life and happiness.
Dubbed «Bonds that Matter» for its focus on these beginning - of - life issues, the ICRI's inaugural conference gathered scholars, activists, and students from around the country to Simi Valley, California last Friday to discuss the various ways in which these four practices violate children's rights.
So right from the start, the issue is not eternal life, but profit.
Martin Luther, for example, that great reformer who battled the Catholic church over the issue of how to receive eternal life, called the book of James, «a right strawy epistle» meaning that there was nothing in it but wood, hay and stubble.
In the discussion about the death penalty, there is the ultimate moral issue of the right to take life, and whether even the state has this right.
Morris identifies the definition of marriage, the right to life, government vs. private health care, the national debt, and religious freedoms as key issues.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z