Both writers, however, look tough end - of -
life issues right in the eye and, with intelligence and sensitivity, invite their readers to do the same.
Not exact matches
The EU wants to agree first on the U.K.'s financial and budgetary liabilities — the so - called Brexit Bill — as well as finding a mutually agreeable resolution to the
issue of the Irish border, and some concrete confirmation of the future
rights for EU citizens»
living in the U.K.
For instance, if you're seeking help with a broad range of financial
issues, ranging from how to invest or fine - tune your tax planning to choosing the
right amount of
life or disability insurance or ensuring that your estate plan matches your desires, I would say that your best bet is to find a certified financial planner.
The ads covered a wide range of hot - button political
issues, including the Black
Lives Matter movement, LGBT
rights, immigration, and gun
rights.
The word «iconic» gets thrown around a lot, but it was the
right word for the cover of
LIFE magazine's August 15, 1969
issue.
«I am hoping that once elections are out of the way, we will be able to solve these
issues,» he added referring to the
rights of EU citizens who already
live in the U.K.
The bottom line appears to be that the United Nations was unable to find a real
life woman that would be able to champion the
rights of ALL women on the
issue of gender equality and the fight for their empowerment.The United Nations has decided that Wonder Woman is the role model that women and girls all round the world should look up to.
All three women are on Fortune's list of 34 Leaders Who Are Changing Health Care, which is
live online (love to say that) on Fortune.com
right spanking now — and which appears in full analog glory in our May 1
issue, speeding to mailboxes and newsstands this moment.
Not having chicken available is a big
issue, but it's not a
life - threatening
issue, and the company applied the
right amount of humor to the situation.
Life sometimes brings big
issues that have to be dealt with
right away.
Ambrose's description of the matter as a «political
issue» has it about
right — not only in terms of potential hypocrisy, but as a possible suggestion of personal extravagance, the great sin of political
life.
I can not believe the ignorance and bias on this with Statistics Canada - I mean come on people lets get with the times - you are operating a Statistical agency like we are
living in the 1950's - this is indeed the 21st century - income polarization is a massive
issue, and to report on income like the manner that this article did is just out
right garbage!!
When two people
live in a committed relationship for decades and some hospital functionary bars one from visiting the other in the hospital because they can't marry and hence are technically unrelated in the eyes of the law, that is a civil
rights issue.
These atheist comedians are like dogs that can lead us
right to the good stuff — the
issues we really need to research in order to cultivate healthy spiritual
lives.
Perhaps with enough people hammering the
issues of abortion and gay marriage, Harris is
right to direct her attention and effort to other
issues of mercy and justice, but the flavor of the book seems to downplay the importance of traditional marriage, infant
life, and the church's role in mercy ministry.
The
issue is not a «
right to
life»
issue, it is not a religious
issue, it is a women's health and civil
rights issue - period.
Life and death decisions are not
issues of a woman's
right to «choose».
But now those are already there at yours maybe if you prepare them
right as to education and training for finally deputing them to return to their own countries with the needful backup and authority they will be useful tools for the advancement and prosperity of their nations then you will have no one wanting to immigrate leaving behind their own families and friends... in addition to that you will see those who immigrated towards your country start moving back to their own countries and this is the only solution to resolve the
issue of illegal immigration and to find peace... otherwise if things go on as it is today surely slowly slowly you will find that your own countries become inherited by piling up immigrants who might get starved due negligence turn on against the Host country... that has contributed in the destructions of their countries but not towards and advancements or developments of their countries and nations to find peace and make a
living..!?
With courts increasingly willing to nullify popular legislation and proclaim new
rights, legislators are encouraged to avoid their responsibility for tackling controversial
issues; interest groups are encouraged to take their cases to the courts rather than to try to persuade their fellow citizens; and citizens get the feeling that they have no say in setting the conditions under which they
live, work, and raise their children.
If abortion and related
life issues are in fact the great civil -
rights issues of our time» in that they test whether the state may arbitrarily deny the protection of the law to certain members of the human community» then Griswold eventually led to a situation in which the Democratic and Republican positions on civil
rights flipped, with members of today's Democratic party playing the role that its Southern intransigents played during the glory days of the American civil -
rights movement.
On the other, atheists would argue that a world directly guided by reason and evidence is more effective in addressing both general and specific
issues affecting the
rights and quality of
life of individuals and societies.
And then I recognized that my academic language of distancing analysis and explanation also served to obfuscate the clear moral dimensions of
life and the need to choose between
right and wrong, and that on some
issues analysis or explanation is itself a form of collusion.
I allow myself, by my observer standpoint and scholarly method, to absent myself from any confrontation either in my teaching or in my
life with the pressing
issues of
right and wrong.
However, these
issues start with the disadvantage (for their proponents) of trying to overcome the bulwark of human
rights laws which, since the end of the Second World War, have increasingly placed duties on nations to protect
life and to outlaw any deliberate deprivation of
life.
The church tries to get around the
issue by attempting to somehow separate the individual from who they are and thereby maintain the
right to openly condemn them and / or seek to impose a
life of celibacy and deny them the same
rights of love, marriage, and family they themselves enjoy.
He said: «It's very significant because usually pope's do not comment on individual situations although their statements on
life,
right to
life and bioethics
issues have been very strong in the past.
After three years of married
life, a Daddy - like dude came into my
life which brought every single Daddy
issue I had
right back up to surface level.
Will traditional marriage follow the path of preborn
life — an
issue moving from judicial activism and socially elite proclamations that a generational shift was «inevitable» and «the debate is over» to our day decades later where the youngsters are more
right minded about abortion than their parents.
The pro-
life group Ohio
Right to
Life had been fighting for the law, and
issued a statement on Friday that said,
Forty - five leading pro-
life advocates, including Gary Bauer of the Family Research Council, James Dobson of Focus on the Family, Clarke Forsythe of Americans United for
Life, Wanda Franz of the National
Right to
Life Committee, and Ralph Reed of the Christian Coalition, signed a much heralded joint «Statement of Pro-
Life Principle and Concern» published in First Things in 1996 in which the primary legal complaint was made that Roe «wounded American democracy» by removing the
issue of abortion from «democratic concern.»
The
issue of protecting the basic
rights of persons from hostile or indifferent state governments was constitutionally resolved almost one hundred and fifty years ago in the Fourteenth Amendment, purchased with the blood of hundreds of thousands of American
lives in the awful crucible of the Civil War.
It is, I think, necessary to question what it takes for one to stand truly equal among one's fellows; to explore the limits of a
rights - oriented approach to the problem of inequality between racially distinct populations in our contemporary national
life; to deal with
issues of dignity, shame, personal responsibility, character and values, deservingness.
As for the «narrow public witness» against which John Murdock rightly cautions, I really don't think «prioritizing» equals «ignoring,» such that to prioritize the defense of religious freedom and the
right to
life excludes other
issues from the Church's social witness and public policy advocacy.
Since the State considers them human babies as well... it is a human
rights issue for the
right for the baby to
live.
American Catholics back Pope's downplaying of contentious social
issues... because American Catholics believe that that it is
RIGHT TO BE FREE to
live according to one's own «
rights»... and this belief confesses that it is
RIGHT TO BE FREE to worship any «god»... and Jorge Bergoglio has declared that this «FREEDOM» IS
RIGHT.
The
issue is not property
rights, but the enemy's eternal
life.
This is a complex and not easily definable
issue and anyone with «easy» answers in my view is not admitting the fallen and terrible condition of mankind in general and that as much as we would attempt to make categorical statements as to «all war is wrong» or «war is the
right soultion» we are making statements that just cant stand up to either biblical exegesis or the reality of the world we
live in.
Other
issues fought for are democracy,
life within a community, the respect and recognition of the basic human
rights of immigrants and refugees.
Psychosis / most psychiatric illnesses often arise in adolescence or in early adult
life however 75 per cent of children with mental health disorders /
issues do not get the help they need — I fell into that 75 per cent, I was misdiagnosed by a doctor and then the self - induced trance - like altered state of consciousness induced by intense / deep meditation and prayer coupled with the theology about how prayer and God work in a Christian's
life (more on this below) just pushed me
right over the edge.
For what drives the litigation for gay
rights is the need to have the gay
life recognized and confirmed in principle in every setting in which the
issue may arise.
Take them one at a time, spending as much time as you need to discuss thoroughly the
issues and feelings that arise: «The ideas and
issues which excite me most are...;» «The things that are most worth
living for
right now are...;» «I feel the most joy (pain, hope, lonely, together) when...;» «What I really believe about God is...;» «I feel closest to (most distant from) God when...;» «I get spiritually high when...;» «The beliefs that mean the most to me now are...;» «The beliefs from my childhood which no longer make sense are...;» «
Life has the least (the most) meaning for me when...;» «I feel closest to you (most distant from you) spiritually when...;» «The way I really feel about the church is...;» «I'd like to do the following, to enjoy more spiritual sharing...;» «To enrich the spiritual life of our family, I'd like
Life has the least (the most) meaning for me when...;» «I feel closest to you (most distant from you) spiritually when...;» «The way I really feel about the church is...;» «I'd like to do the following, to enjoy more spiritual sharing...;» «To enrich the spiritual
life of our family, I'd like
life of our family, I'd like to..
The NATO essay points again to the fact that, whether the
issue under discussion is welfare policy or foreign policy, what we consistently find in the work of Irving Kristol is a consideration of public
life and governing from the standpoint of the individual soul» and, by the same token, a consideration of the need to foster the
right kinds of virtues in individual souls in order for the most desirable regimes to be successful.
In the early days bioethics focused on such larger
issues, but the field was in time overtaken by an interest in what can be called regulatory bioethics: the protection of research subjects, the advancement of patient
rights, and the devising of procedural guidelines for end - of -
life care, for instance.
Thus the «
right to die» campaign was able to represent the
issue as a general referendum «on getting government out of this important personal decision,» and «on returning control of end of
life decisions to where it belongs - with the dying person.»
It is not an
issue of tolerance [as both sides are arrogant] but of the
right to exist for one's own
life and happiness.
Dubbed «Bonds that Matter» for its focus on these beginning - of -
life issues, the ICRI's inaugural conference gathered scholars, activists, and students from around the country to Simi Valley, California last Friday to discuss the various ways in which these four practices violate children's
rights.
So
right from the start, the
issue is not eternal
life, but profit.
Martin Luther, for example, that great reformer who battled the Catholic church over the
issue of how to receive eternal
life, called the book of James, «a
right strawy epistle» meaning that there was nothing in it but wood, hay and stubble.
In the discussion about the death penalty, there is the ultimate moral
issue of the
right to take
life, and whether even the state has this
right.
Morris identifies the definition of marriage, the
right to
life, government vs. private health care, the national debt, and religious freedoms as key
issues.