It's a circle of
life kind of thing.
In 1980, Alan Parker's film must have been seen as a slice of
life kind of thing.
Not exact matches
People use online dating because they feel like they're not meeting enough
of the right
kind of people in their daily
life, and if they were, then they wouldn't use an online dating site, that's why you don't use it when you're in college or a lot
of people don't use it when they're in grad school because you meet so many great people all the time, I wouldn't join an online dating site, but it's when you don't have those opportunities to have those interactions that people feel the need and I think
things like Hinge, and even Tinder to some extent, allow you to meet just a lot
of people so that you don't have to go through that process, which is a lot more effort, to do an online dating site.
This is the
kind of thing you need to think through how it will impact your
life.
The point is to make sure you're doing the
things you want to do and that lead to the
kind of life and business you want.
We should never be too busy to do an act
of kindness — they should simply be a part
of our
life and we should be
kind because that is the right
thing to do, not because it enhances our reputation — that's just a nice bonus.
Take the
things you know about your potential customer — where they
live, what
kind of business they're in, their age.
In other words, those happen because those are natural firsts, those happen naturally because
of evolution but can you create those
kind of important moments in your
life and it really comes down to creating doing new
things, always creating — you have to be a little more creative when you get older to create those new
things but those are the
things you think about which I think are quite important.
One
of the
things I've done in my work is
kind of show the hypocrisy
of progressive people who say they believe in inequality, but when it comes to their individual choices about where they're going to
live and where they're going to send their children, they make very different decisions, and I just didn't want to do that.
Even though algorithms decide so much
of a citizen's
life — what ads a person sees, what political messages they hear, what
kinds of loans they can get, how they fair in the criminal justice system — these
things are all under the sway
of algorithms, and most consumers don't feel empowered to push back because they don't know the math.
The best accidental side effect
of running a website and writing articles for Seeking Alpha is that it occasionally allows me to stumble into friends I haven't to in a while — the
kind of people that you enjoyed being around, but then
life happens, and for whatever reasons,
things happen and you fall out
of touch.
However, other
kinds of debt, like the
kind from credit cards, can be some
of the most expensive and damaging debt we accrue in
life because interest rates are generally extremely high and many people get used to spending on
things they can't really afford.
Based on the simplest measures that people calculate care,
life expectancy, those
kind of things, there's no demonstrable difference, and people can certainly argue on the margin.
A family connection to law enforcement is not the
kind of thing that has traditionally been viewed as discrediting in American
life — and certainly not as discrediting in conservative political circles — but
things are changing in the Trump era.
The only
thing I display is my capacity to be unfaithful to the
kind of life Jesus calls me to.
The
kind of evolution that creates a new and more complicated
living thing DOES N'T HAPPEN!
This is the
thing: when you start to hit 28 or 30, everything starts to divide, and you can see very clearly two
kinds of people: on one side, people who have used their 20s to learn and grow, to find God and themselves and their deep dreams, people who know what works and what doesn't, who have pushed through to become real
live adults.
yo the
thing is not about believing or not, is the fact that if we don't believe then we are worthless
living garbage who occupy a space in the universe only to create crap and pollution, in that
kind of case we would better be recycled into some industrial material for a better use than eating and
living like cattle, but if there is a god we acquire a divine status and a purpose to continue to exist beyond afterlife or at least the idea
of it, which would give
life a sense right?
The great
thing is that when we look at Scripture, we catch all
kinds of glimpses
of different ways we should be
living, like Jubilee — good heavens, there's a great idea.
For one
thing, it means one isn't Jean - Paul Sartre, the «archetypal example»
of anti-political, «literary politics,» a manner
of «engaging with political
life that deliberately... ignored reality and that preferred to remain on the level
of an abstract theory or a
kind of pure, contentless moralizing.»
and being aware
of your environment, being respectful
of those
of all beliefs and none beliefs, and
of our world, and its about personal responsibility, with that said why is is such a bad
thing to believe in something greater than yourself, how can somebody
live there
life without believing in something, what
kind of life is that,
life is meant to be discovered, its one big mystery, and all the science in the world can still not prove how we exactly came to be?
The data encoded on the DNA inside every cell
of every
living thing is a
kind of written language.
There are a lot
of things that could be remotely possible, but what
kind of a
life would you have if you feared them all as much as some people fear God?
She continues to question all
things spiritual, cares deeply about
living a Christ - centered
life, and creates all
kinds of problems by
living out loud; she blames her family for continuing to encourage her.
It's unclear how religiously observant Hoffman was later in
life; certainly, some
of the details
of his private
life — and tragic death — are the
kind of thing you'd read in the tabloids, not your parish bulletin.
Then next... «And God said, Let the earth bring forth the
living creature after his
kind, cattle, and creeping
thing, and beast
of the earth after his
kind: and it was so.
From the second century on, the Christian
thing has been understood as a
kind of «forming»
of persons»
lives on the model
of education as paideia.
If you knew intimate details about my own past and the deep hurt I've endured, you would apologize — or maybe you wouldn't care at all; after all, most never consider that
kind of thing, though their past encounters with «Christians» is enough to justify their
life - long disdain for them in the eyes
of the people that applaud them.
If the sufferer talks to himself in private, asks himself which
kind of life he leads, whether he truthfully wills only one
thing: then he is not tempted to relate in detail what he himself knows best
of all, he is not tempted to compare.
As such they would be instances
of, rather than exceptions to, the very
kind of experiential activity that occurs in all
living things and, so process thinkers speculate, in all existents, even subatomic events.
Kind of like the way
things are in
life.
In taking this sixth step, Christians affirm that the «tendency toward the human and the humane (toward «Christ») in the ultimate nature
of things» which has existed since the beginning
of time «has become evident and clear only now in the new order
of relationships just coming into view» in the Christian community To be sure, «any community which becomes a vehicle in history
of more profoundly humane patterns
of life» can be a part
of this new order, but the events around Jesus have at least a
kind of priority as its first clear manifestation.
It takes a special
kind of strengh, mental toughness, to admit these
things and deal with it,
live with it.
Beginning in the 1950s, scientists started trying to mimic the conditions on the early Earth to see whether some
kind of «
life - fairy» was necessary to get
things started.
Actually Brehvik does not consider himself a christian in his words, «in the strictest sense», so the first part
of your point is moot... Secondly I think a fairer statement would be that not «all» muslims are violent extremists, as many who don't
live in western countries are, as their book does instruct them to kill any and all who do not procalim allah as the one god and mohammed as his prophet... As far as having extreme passion for one's beliefs, if someone was truly to be an «extreme» christian that person would be completely loving as this was Jesus» command to love both God and everyone... to take that to the extreme would mean «extreme» loving, like the radical
kind of love that caused Jesus to endure the cross for the sins
of us all... includinig the man who committed this atrocity and yes any and all
of the muslim's who have committed similar
things.
Whereas contemporary understanding envisions the curious person as open to knowledge,
life, and new experiences in a
kind of whimsical, impish, or carefree way, scholastic theologians saw curiosity as a wayward pursuit which impedes the studied application
of the mind to worthy
things.
You do not understand everything the Christian church teaches, you say, and some
things that you think you do understand you do not believe, but you at least see enough in the
kind of faith and
life for which Christianity stands so that you would like to do something about it.
24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the
living creature after his
kind, cattle, and creeping
thing, and beast
of the earth after his
kind: and it was so.
We
live in a period
of rapid changes
of all
kinds, and we have come to accept change, development and progress as part
of the order
of things.
But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only
of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such
things up to a certain point, and yet the whole
life may be sin, the well - known
kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint
of God as to what His will is for this self.
And we want an explanation that will make sense, restore some
kind of order, put
things in perspective, help us to trust in the ultimate goodness and meaning
of life.
It's
kind of ridiculous how often I used to get mad at the effects
of that rotten
thing in my
life instead
of dealing with the cause, the rotten
thing itself.
(And this
kind of disagreement is not the same
thing as ugly places where the disagreement sucks the
life out
of us or abuses us or are unsafe for our souls or our bodies.)
Yet he does not seem to recognize that this can only mean one
thing: The revelation
of God in Christ must come to you and me by way
of a
kind of interchange between individuals in deep communion, whereby the meaning
of past events can possess our minds and transform our
lives, even as it did in the fellowship that formed around Jesus.
I have suggested elsewhere that value - free technology, the military - industrial complex, and narrow nationalism might be modern examples
of such principalities and powers.9 Hendrikus Berkhof suggests that human traditions, astrology, fixed religious rules, clans, public opinion, race, class, state, and Volk are among the powers.10 Walter Wink sees the powers as the inner aspects
of institutions, their «spirituality,» the inner spirit or driving force that animates, legitimates, and regulates their outward manifestations.11 They are «the invisible forces that determine human existence «12 When such
things dehumanize human
life, thwart and distort the human spirit, block God's gift
of shalom, the followers
of Jesus are rallied for a new
kind of holy war.
But odd with a new Pope and Lousiville the college
of Cardinals and Blue Devils that injury
thing on national television, blackouts at superbowls and other such nonsense but stay honest true and keep integrity seems
kind of important with whatever is going on in ones
life.
In the organic realm, too, a
living thing's self - transcendence into another
kind, if and to the extent that anything
of the sort occurs, a question which does not concern us here, will constitute the new
kind as such.
So much in Christianity had me seeing these
kinds of things only in the light
of demons and evil and satan, that when I started reading and understanding more (when I was in junior high school) and comprehending the concept
of the birth -
life - death - rebirth cycles, and how there needs to be death and decay for their to be birth and growth... it really made a huge impression on how I saw the world.
It just helped me
kind of realign and put
things in perspective and say, «You know what man,
life is not pretty, and it's not neat, but God is still God.
When we think
of all that has come from him in the impulse toward human freedom and dignity — the challenge
of ignorance and the attempt to remedy it, the concern for and conquest
of disease, the sensitivity to the needs and plight
of the weak, destitute, helpless, and those in every
kind of suffering, the stabilizing
of the inner
lives of millions
of his followers around the world, and the fostering
of a prophetic attack on such giant social evils as prejudice, injustice, and war — when we consider the
things that have stemmed from this «penniless teacher
of Nazareth,» we are dull indeed if the wonder
of it does not sweep over our souls.