Sentences with phrase «life of the fetus»
Most pro-life people I know consider the life of all fetuses to be equal.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/
«However, the Court also maintained that the state has an interest in protecting the life of a fetus after viability — that is, after the point at which the fetus is capable of living outside the womb.
If saving the life of the fetus is so important that they would consider stripping others of their freedom to do it, then it is important enough for them to sacrifice of themselves both personally and financially to do it.
If you believe the government can force a woman to donate the use of her internal organs to sustain the life of a fetus, then why can't the government force anyone to donate the use their internal organs to sustain the life of someone requiring a transplant?
Why can't we look at the quality of life some of these fetuses would face had they come to term?
Modern society values the life of the fetus over that of the mother.
Under their care, my TSH soared far above the recommended reference range for pregnancy endangering the life of my fetus, and I miscarried.
The local judge (Graf, The Brady Bunch Movie) in the small town is so fed up with seeing her face, and the fact that she has had four children already (all of which had to be given up for adoption due to their mother's behavior), that when he discovers she is pregnant again decides to make law history and have her put in prison for endangering the life of her fetus, making it clear he would be a bit more lenient with her if she were to have it aborted.
While protesters are fighting Planned Parenthood for the life of a fetus, I'm fighting to change the rhetoric used to include fighting for the woman that's seeking help at health care centers.
Impose requirements to preserve the life of a fetus delivered during an abortion procedure (Arizona and Arkansas)
Not exact matches
For a more current look at what happens when abortion is severely restricted, we looked to Brazil, where abortion is illegal except in cases of rape, when the mother's life is in danger, and in the rare instances of anencephaly, a severe fetal anomaly in which the fetus lacks parts of the brain, leaving the infant with virtually no chance of survival.
Thats right folks, the right to life candidate was making money off the disposal of human fetuses.
It is fancy and rad to you to say that you support the life and rights of the unborn fetus.
While I personally feel that rights of the fetus to live eventually override the mother's right to voluntarily terminate, that point is near the end of pregnancy and I'm still hesitant to tell someone what to do with their own body.
The world can not know the unsurpassable worth of human life without a people who consistently work to protect it - in the fetus, in the convict, in the immigrant, in the soldier, and in the enemy.
In 1992 the members of Valley Hospital Association (VHA), a private secular organization made up of residents of Mat - su Borough, adopted a policy prohibiting abortions in its hospital except in cases of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest, or where the life of the mother is threatened, or because «the fetus has a condition that is incompatible with life.»
@Keith actually it's you who can't seem to stomach the reality of things we know full well what it means, once again you have to get your facts strait, it's only legal to abort the first 21 weeks when the fetus can not live outside of the mothers womb, if the mother is to give birth within this time line the the fetus could not survive (a miscarriage).
As a result of the Thomson / Yamanaka breakthroughs, it is, all of a sudden, respectable to speak about the humanity not only of fetuses on the verge of becoming babies but of the embryo at the very beginning of life.
A human fetus goes through the entire evolutionary process in 9 months, from simple multi-cellular life, through amphibian (some children are born with webbing still between their fingers and toes, like a frog), through mammalia and primates (we even have tails, of which the coccyx is a remainder).
once again you have to get your facts strait, it's only legal to abort the first 21 weeks when the fetus can not live outside of the mothers womb if the mother would give birth within this time line the the fetus wouldn't survive, a miscarriage.
What will appear on the computer list of acceptable and unacceptable genetic traits that determine the life or death of the fetus?
Living does not equal having legal rights that trump those of the person upon whom the fetus is dependent.
Just being an atheist doesn't mean I subscribe to someone's idea of what life is and when it «starts» and whether a fetus is a baby or not.
We should make a firm distinction between the lawful execution of a convicted murder and the taking of the life of an innocent fetus» which is done without justification or excuse.
They probably wanted to redefine «person» so that they could weasel their way into applying the rights we have as living breathing human beings to clusters of cells (fetus) not viable outside the uterus.
Which means that the fetus, which has all of the organs, including gender specific organs, is also the continuation of human life.
Either the fetus is a person whose life must be defended (as surely as if it were already outside the womb), or it's a bunch of cells, a mere pimple, and the woman is free to do as she will.
The argument that life begins at conception is absurd in that what should be said is parasitic life begins at conception, actual human life only becomes a valid argument when the fetus is able to live outside the womb, prior to that the life is basically in the hands of the host — mother.
I believe once a fetus is capable of living without the direct need of another person's body, then that fetus is ent - itled to be protected.
If parents may abort a fetus with Down's syndrome — whether to make room for another baby, to spare it a life of possible frustration, or simply to avoid the expense and fatigue of caring for a retarded child — then they may also painlessly kill an infant.
They are the fullness of time in relation to the fetus or the seed in three ways: (1) as source of initial time by giving initial becoming or life to the seed or fetus; (2) as source of continued time or growth; and (3) as source of maturation — hence, of fullness of time and growth of the seed or fetus.
Kenneth C. Edelin, M.D., is convicted by a Boston jury of the manslaughter of an anonymous emerging life born to an unknown, unwed black teen - ager — a 24 - week fetus.
If the fetus does not have the same claim to life as a person, it appears that the newborn baby does not either, and the life of a newborn baby is of less value to it than the life of a pig, a dog, or a chimpanzee is to the nonhuman animal.
The American Lutherans state that «a qualitative distinction must be made between [the fetus's] claims and the rights of a responsible person made in God's image who is living in relationships.»
At issue is Obama's opposition to Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a «born alive infant» entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.
The tyranny of the PRO-LIFE argument is so retarded because it demands that NO ONE should be able to have an abortion, even if the fetus is (1) the result of a vicious r - ape, (2) the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother, among other examples that prove that abortion is not always an «act of convenience.»
Woman is concerned about how having a baby could change her life 16 % Woman can't afford baby now 21 % Woman has problems with relationship or wants to avoid single parenthood 12 % Woman is unready for responsibility 21 % Woman doesn't want others to know she has had se x or is pregnant 1 % Woman is not mature enough, or is too young to have a child 11 % Woman has all the children she wanted, or has all grown - up children 8 % Husband or partner wants woman to have an abortion 1 % Fetus has possible health problem 3 % Woman has health problem 3 % Woman's parents want her to have abortion < 1 % Woman was victim of ra pe or inc est 1 %
Pro-life folk honestly believe that the fetus growing in the womb is a real, unique, human life, and the idea of killing a baby is totally appalling.
However, the definition of life after birth involes a beating heart... i think you need to do some research on when a fetuses heart is debveloped and beating... you may just be surprised.
The woman will have to be constantly paranoid about what she eats, drinks, and does with her life, since she'll constantly be afraid that she'll be charged with murdering or harming the fetus inside of her.
Bu tuntil that point, until the fetus has all of its organs and a functioning nervous system, there is no LIFE to take.
Otherwise, instead of dead fetuses, you'll have dead children and dead adults who have lived shortened lives filled with suffering due to an absence of basic resources like food and health care.
It's easy to sit on the sideline, offer your opinions about when life begins and call babies fetuses but in the end it doesn't affect you personally unless you are the father of this child.
You know, if you give a fetus the right to life, you're basically enslaving the woman in whose body that fetus is growing, and if she harms the fetus at all, or ends up miscarrying it, birthing it prematurely, or ends up with a stillborn baby, she'll be charged with the death of that fetus.
Basically, the fetus inside of her will be ruling her life.
When one camp argues that women's «reproductive rights» must be protected and another camp argues that the fetus» «right to life» must be protected, we seem to have reached an impasse which the language of rights, in and of itself, can not lead us out of.
By implication, however, if it could be shown that the fetus is a separate life from that of its mother (for example, having its own genetic code from the time of conception), then even by liberal criteria there would be a crime with a real victim, hence prohibited by the social contract with its minimal requirement of protection of innocent persons.
Since a fetus is a human being, deliberate abortion is also an unwarranted taking of life.
The Hawaiian court has thus set itself on the same course of action as the misguided Supreme Court in 1973 when it thought that laws about abortion were merely an assertion of the rights of a living mother and an unborn fetus.
But as his thinking on the morality of abortion gradually changed, he began to see the fetus as a very important being whose life ought not to be ended except under extraordinary circumstances.