Sentences with phrase «life of your former spouse»

Circumstances in your life or the life of your former spouse often change significantly after a divorce.

Circumstances in your life or the life of your former spouse often change significantly after a divorce.

Not exact matches

Clergy spouses touch members» lives in ways positive or negative, of which the former may not even be aware.

Unless you fear for your life, doing a vanishing act, leaving a note, or doing it in an explosion or in a mean way not only is the wrong way, but it will likely make the divorce process even more miserable for you (your spouse will still have a numerous chances to get even during the legal process, and during any interactions thereafter — few can go through the rest of their lives without having some necessary contact with a former spouse).

Perhaps not; while about 15 percent to 45 percent of first marriages end in divorce about 60 percent to 80 percent of second marriages end in divorce (although numbers vary on how many of those second marriages are to the former spouse or a different one with assorted children from different parents all trying to live happily a la «The Brady Bunch» under one roof).

It's bad enough grieving your loss when all of a sudden you're confronted with a harsh truth that makes you question everything about your former spouses and your life.

Eliot was listed as the plaintiff in the short - lived case against his spouse, which came on the heels of a scathing Post exclusive that revealed the ousted governor was canoodling with former Bill de Blasio spokesman Lis Smith.

The majority of cases where a life insurance beneficiary is contested have to do with divorce (former spouse wasn't removed from policy) or changes made soon before death (predatory person convinced senior to make them sole beneficiary).

Divorce Decrees Divorce decrees often require one party to carry life insurance for the benefit of the former spouse or children.

So long as the former spouse is in control of the money, doling it out when he or she decides to do so, the custodial parent will be unable to get on with his or her new life.

If you've been living under a rock for the past week, heres the low - down: spouses of current and former Rockstar San Diego employees posted a blog post about the working conditions of the studio.

We have written about the Arizona Court of Appeals decision in the Van Dyke v. Steinle case in which the court of appeals had to determine if a basis to terminate spousal maintenance exists when a former spouse receiving the spousal maintenance moves in with a love interest and is now sharing living costs with the new love interest.

The appellate court disregarded the husband's argument that the award of spousal support was excessive relative to its finding of her monthly exceptions, as his misunderstanding that an award of spousal support is solely designed to maintain the spouse at her former standard of living during the marriage, citing Robinson and Miller v. Cox, 44 Va..

Perhaps your child support or custody agreement is no longer in the best interest of your child, or perhaps your former spouse is trying to avoid living up to their part of the agreement.

In 1984, «Litigation» (the former title of this column) rediscovered the Queen's Proctor was still alive when Sir John Arnold, President of the Family Division, rescinded three decrees nisi based on unreasonable behaviour in favour of petitioners who had sworn special procedure affidavits falsely deposing that they and their spouses were not living together.

On the other hand, in England, a divorcee is able to secure financial support from a former spouse for the rest of her life.

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a decision regarding living together and spousal maintenance in Van Dyke v. Steinle regarding whether a former spouse's cohabitation with another person provides a basis to modify or terminate an Arizona spousal maintenance award.

To the contrary, the Arizona Supreme Court previously ruled in Smith v. Mangum that cohabitation did not create a «de facto marriage», but concluded such a relationship could create a change in circumstances justifying a modification of spousal maintenance if the situation decreased a former spouse's living expenses.

Family relationships covered by the definition of «family member» in the PAFVA include current and former spouses, adult interdependent partners, others residing (or formerly residing) in intimate relationships, persons who are parents of one or more children, regardless of whether they have ever lived together, persons who reside together where one of them has care and custody over the other under a court order, and generally, those related to each other by blood, marriage, adoption, or adult interdependent relationships, as well as children in the care and custody of the above persons (PAFVA section 1 (1)(d)-RRB-.

jealousy and possessiveness (about a former spouse's new relationship, contentment with life or ease of transition from the old relationship);

Sometimes you hear about Family litigants for whom their dispute against the former spouse has taken on a life of its own, and who will not stop until they have literally exhausted every possible legal and procedural avenue.

(b) «Intimate relationship» means a relationship between spouses, former spouses, past or present unmarried couples, or persons who are both parents of the same child regardless of whether the persons have been married or have lived together at any time.

Under Minnesota law, the dissolution of a marriage automatically revokes an individual's designation of a former spouse as a life insurance beneficiary.

Divorce Decrees Divorce decrees often require one party to carry life insurance for the benefit of the former spouse or children.

They see their former spouse as the total problem in their life and are convinced that getting rid of that problem through divorce will bring ultimate resolution.

The purpose of a divorce is to end a marriage so that the past conflicts end and the former spouses get on with life.

Examples of instructions in the original decree that a spouse may not comply with include payment of child support, adding minor children to a work health insurance policy, or adding the former spouse as a beneficiary on a life insurance policy for benefit of the minor children.

Typically, the former spouse must move in with a romantic partner, rather than just a roommate, and live together for a certain period of time for the cohabitation to be actionable.

Sometimes former spouses try to use bankruptcy to get around living up to the demands of a property settlement agreement.

It is healthy for your former spouse to be an active part of the lives of their children.

(a) Child support and, when the child support obligation is being enforced by the Department of Revenue, spousal support or alimony for the spouse or former spouse of the obligor with whom the child is living.

When the child support obligation is being enforced by the Department of Revenue, the term «support order» also means a judgment, decree, or order, whether temporary or final, issued by a court of competent jurisdiction for the support and maintenance of a child and the spouse or former spouse of the obligor with whom the child is living which provides for monetary support, health care, arrearages, or past support.

Research shows it is actually not uncommon for widowed parents of young children to remarry within 5 years of the loss of their former spouses.1 Some researchers have even described the deceased spouse as remaining like an invisible figure in the new marriage; their influence still lives on through the surviving spouse.2 In all my years watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch, I don't recall many references at all to the deceased parents of the children.

If you have primary custody of your child, try to keep your former spouse informed about big life developments.

If an applicant has a child living with a former spouse, civil partner or cohabitant, they can claim for WFP in respect of that child provided that the WFP applicant is wholly or mainly maintaining the former spouse, civil partner or cohabitant.

When it comes to claiming your child as a dependent, you can only continue to do so after your divorce filings are complete if he or she has lived with you for a longer amount of time throughout the year than with your former spouse.

Ironically during one of the most stressful times in life, you need to function at a peak intellectual level to negotiate a separation with your former spouse, have the time, energy and compassion to be responsive to your children, bring in an income, and create a new home life all the while dealing with a truckload of emotions.

Not re-establishing yourself with the life insurance company as beneficiary on life insurance (or having it stated clearly in your separation agreement) since there is an automatic revocation of former spouse as beneficiary under Colorado Law.

Through their children, former spouses continue to be involved with one another as co-parents for the rest of their lives.