Sentences with phrase «life scientists who»

The survey, conducted by a health - policy group led by David Blumenthal at the Massachusetts General Hospital, found that almost 20 % of the 2167 academic life scientists who responded to a questionnaire said they had delayed publication of data by more than 6 months.

A restructuring pharmaceuticals industry is looking for life scientists who can work together across disciplines within smaller companies

Indeed, Sagan's widow, Ann Druyan, a science popularizer in her own right, says of Tyson: «I know of no living scientist who connects as well with people lacking prior inclination toward matters scientific.

He's a life scientist who believes ageing is a disease that can be treated.

Not exact matches

BIRTH Siri: Ten days before the death of John McCarthy, the computer scientist who had coined the term «artificial intelligence» back in 1956, new machine life appeared on global retail shelves.

«STEM Behind Hollywood» uses the scientists and experts who consult Hollywood filmmakers to create free classroom activities for teachers, including software and iPad apps, to explore popular movie themes such as zombie, superheroes, space and forensics to give students the chance to solve problems as real - life scientists would.

The social scientist, who kicks off her speech with a «free no - tech life hack» that will probably turn your frown upside down, says our body language speaks loud and clear to those around us.

David Kipping, an astronomer at Columbia University who was not involved with the research, told the New Scientist that there «is a legitimate case to be made that this system could host life, and we may be able to infer the presence of that life in the next decade.»

You only need to read the headlines to see the ethical and moral breaches in all walks of life (and that goes for scientists who who fudge figures as well as business people who fudge balance sheets).

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

And unless you are a scientist who has dedicated his life to these pursuits, you really have NO bearing what so ever on modern science!

Be it in the form of solar system supporting life on planet earth or in the works of a scientist who is researching, Creativity a force, a constance presence is eternally at work.

Bill Nye is a typical scientist who believes that a once dead hostile planet just coincidently happened to spring forth life with all it's intricacies.

Professor Michael King states: «The conclusion reached by scientists who have investigated the origins and stability of se - xual orientation is that it is a human characteristic that is formed early in life, and is resistant to change.

I am unaware of ANY great scientist living today who is a christian... so please name him.

He said, «I am unaware of ANY great scientist living today who is a christian... so please name him.

Theo Phileo «Humans will have created life in the laboratory» There are also scientists who are experimenting in how life could have arisen naturally.

Professor Michael King states: «The conclusion reached by scientists who have investigated the origins and stability of sexual orientation is that it is a human characteristic that is formed early in life, and is resistant to change.

In particular, I have tried to understand how this great scientist who became a close friend of Albert Einstein was also a priest, faithful to the teachings of the Catholic Church and deeply rooted in his spiritual and sacerdotal life.

For many other scientists, however, and for people of a modernistic bent of mind who saw in the sciences «a new messiah,» or at least a directive of life displacing both religion and philosophy, this preoccupation with the immediacies to the exclusion of ultimates meant frankly a secularizing of life, that is, a relinquishing of all ideal or transcendent aspects which hope and wonder might evoke.

As a scientist and Christian, who knows alcoholics, I choose to believe that conscious life is a sort of test of its ability to submit itself to something which can never in this Universe be proved exists with empirical evidence.

I have to follow Jesus who offers life after death, not scientists who say just die and that's it.

There is famous quote by the agnostic Dr. Jastrow «For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream.

These are scientists, theologians and philosophers who consider Darwinian explanations to be appropriate to biology but who can not take evolutionary processes to be the ultimate or final explanation of life and its complexity.

I refer here to the small group of scientists who argue that in fact there is no qualitative difference between living organisms and other chemical processes.

I think most of the Americans are in lost... as most of them do not know who their father is and it is very unfortunate... even if they know who their father is, the mom has children from diff men outside of marriage... and while a child is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like if you go back early nineteen century, women were not allowed to go to beach without being covered... and now it totally opposite... if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can be listed... And then you go to Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front of the Church an old man's statue with long beard standing with extending of both hand... some of the status are blank, white, Spanish and so on... so they are being taught God as an old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll shows a huge number of young American turns to Atheism or believing there is no God and so on... Its hard to assume where these nations are going with the name of modernization... nothing wrong having scientists discovered the cure of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous generations and correct ourselves... also ppl are becoming so much slave of material things...

In these congregations are thousands of professional people, teachers, scientists, engineers, physicians, and well - informed people generally who are in a position to understand the ecological facts of life.

He was an administrator and scientist who applied «the Bible into my life, every word, and it worked.»

Our age is in need of a great philosopher; one who can thread his way, step by step, through the intricate labyrinth of reasoning into which scientists have been led, eyes riveted to earth, by the desire to improve our human lot, the desire to destroy life, or mere common curiosity; one who can keep his mind, at the same time, open to the metaphysical implications of all he learns, and at last put the wholecorpus of our knowledge together in one grand synthesis.

Article I of the Statement of Belief, which must be signed by all who seek membership in the First Church of Christ Scientist in Boston, the Mother Church, reads: «As adherents of Truth, we take the inspired word of the Bible as our sufficient guide to eternal life.»

And the scientist who sees his life in relation to God and man may perhaps have the courage and the integrity to act in accordance with his convictions.

Nevertheless, as we have seen, there is a small but growing number of scientists, both in physics and biology, who operate with a relational model, who see some correspondence between the constructs of the mind and reality itself, however inexact, and who also see the possibility of restoring the experience of meaning if the non-human natural world is perceived as dynamic, creative, full of life and purpose, whom process thinkers have engaged in conversation; together they have attempted to explore new visions of reality better suited for adaptation to the urgent needs of the contemporary world.

Do we only criticize scientists who draw inferences for the meaning and purpose of human life from their larger visions of the cosmos and our place in the grand narrative?

And who are these illiterate scientists who didn't spot your mistake in attributing to evolution something outside its technical scope that has also never been proposed by those who do seek life's origins in biochemistry and self replicating systems in inanimate nature.

A genre of writing that fascinates some scholars and clergy consists of books and articles written by scientists who, venturing beyond what can be securely proved, present larger visions of the cosmos, life, the beginning and the end of all things, and the place of the human in the grand narrative.

there are scientists who have created life, not cloning but created living organisms.

The most emotive and challenging chapter in the book revolves around a doctor and scientist who, having suffered a horrendous early life, was incapable of empathy.

It is said that something like ninety - five per cent of all scientists who have ever lived, are still alive.

I suspected when I first heard this claim that the Committee on the Status of Black Americans, loaded as it was with social scientists, had demolished a straw man, a bloodless construct so rigidly defined as to be meaningless in terms of the actual lives of the humans who inhabit the nation's ghettos and who, for the most part, make up what has come to be called the underclass.

The social scientist engaged in this pursuit is like the proverbial physicist struggling up the steep cliff of higher learning to discover the meaning of life, only to find upon reaching the top a humble guru who had - been sitting there all along.

The person and work of these notable scientists who have become theologians constitute a confession that we are living and thinking within a new paradigm of sensibility and rationality, even if we can not clearly define what that paradigm is.

Words and thoughts of a human who is not a scientist or psychologist, just a human who is glad to see life for what it is...

Robert Bellah is a social scientist who outwaits current fashions and lives with and by a vision even when it may be dismissed as utopian or misguided.

If it weren't for the forward thinkers, scientist, s and others who do nt buy your Bronze Age mythology, you WOULD be living in a cave.

Since I am not a scientist, I am not always sure what I am looking at, nor do I have the theoretical background to discern all the implications of a particular phenomenon, but as a preacher — that is, someone who lives on stories — I find the stories rolling in from the frontiers of the new science as rich in meaning as any stories I know.

There were also scientists who succeeded in compartmentalizing their lives.

I was hoping to get an answer from a creationist who wouldn't let their children learn about evolution, someone who would rather homeschool their child just to keep them from being exposed to something that very intelligent scientists have spent their whole lives working on.

Robert Jastrow (self - proclaimed agnostic): «For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream.

Updike presents the reader of his novels and stories with the pseudo — wise men of today's society — with Jimmy, the big Mouseketeer who quotes Socrates; with the neon owl that advertises pretzels; with Ken Whitman, the scientist living in Tarbox who is considered intelligent in his field but who lacks a basic understanding of life; with Bech the writer, honored in direct proportion to the decline of his literary production; with Connor, the efficient, well - trained administrator of the old people's home who fails to comprehend as much of life's mystery as his simple and sometimes senile wards do.

We need Hispanic theologians and social scientists who will reflect from within the common experience of faith of our people, not as outsiders but as believers who are seeking to understand, clarify and enrich our own life of faith.