Sentences with phrase «like cgi»

The car in its promotional video looked like CGI.

The animation on some of the enemies is also superb, looking like a CGI cartoon in places.

But has claims to be true 1920x1080 resolution and look like CGI.

Their games would look like CGI animation.

«Our aging economy is increasingly dependent upon technology for productivity gains and our home - grown players like CGI, Constellation Software and Open Text are very different than the more integrated Apples, Amazons, Microsofts, Facebooks and Alphabets.»

Not like CGI movies by Pocketbook.

Some attempts at romance, like the CGI stagework, don't quite convince, but with Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman hamming up their supporting roles and a typically funky score from Brian Tyler, Now You See Me sells its act with an infectious enthusiasm.

It was possible, though, because — like CGI Rachael — there was a living actor to reference.

Some people may like the CGI used on The Thing but I didn't.

The body movement of the characters in wolf mode is also impressively done with live action stunts and wire work I'm guessing, didn't look like CGI.

In the end, Sharknado 3 - like the CGI monsters that are its true stars - is the beast that it is: single - minded, greedy and ravenous.

Fans may not like the CGI zombies, but unlike the video game creatures in I am Legend (2007), these are more filmed actor - CGI tweaked hybrids; their believability is really dependent on how much viewers will accept the virus as a fast - moving bug which immediately transforms a host into a rabid sprinter with super-strength (not unlike 28 Days Later).

It's easy to understand why Musk himself laughed about Roadster looking very much like CGI.

It was possible, though, because — like CGI Rachael — there was a living actor to reference.

Not exact matches

A CGI version of Elliot the dragon was spliced into the video to give users a sense that they are riding Elliot like a wild stallion through the skies.

The CGI is overdone, and the story feels like a rip - off of Disney's «Pocahontas.»

He admitted to Nelson that he didn't like a lot of the CGI human footage he'd seen in movies.

Was the Wilson who looked like a first round pick just an example of Petrino CGI?

Todd would like to know if it's at all possible if you could «CGI» him with his head on Dick Butkus's body?

Seeing Wenger's name here is like hearing that Zellwiger prat's voice on yet ANOTHER CGI movie.

So if the process is so quick and easy, could an artist like Roman use their skills to create a new breed of realistic, but entirely CGI movies?

Mr. Popper's Penguins uses a mix of live animals and CGI, but the animals, despite a little creative license, behave like the animals they were born to be and not some pipsqueak, wiseacre humans.

But the great leaps forward in CGI don't necessarily make for better movies, and Shrek the Third comes across as a little tired and uncertain, introducing a parade of new characters that seem more like distractions and diversions than significant figures.

At least it looked real and not like a series of obvious CGIs (think Transformers 2).

Like any other kind of special effect, CGI is at its most effective when we're unable or unwilling to tell where the real world ends and the make - believe begins.

It was so refreshing not to see the film under so much CGI like a lot of recent Horror films, and there was a nice amount of stunt work involved!

There's no reason the imaginative freedom that animation allows shouldn't be unleashed on adult themes, especially when graphic novels have entered the literary mainstream and when CGI has blurred the line between live action and animation in films like «300.»

Wow, this movie is awful, I mean the CGI is the worse I have seen this year, (although I, Frankenstein might beat this movie), the acting is horrible, Kellan Lutz is so bland, he makes fellow Twilight star look like Marlon Brando in comparison, the love interest is just as bland, then the

CGI is kept to a minimum, and yet like the view is like neon candy for the eyes.

All are united in their goal to stop Josh Brolin's Thanos (CGI - ed into a hulking purple brute with a corrugated chin, like a fluted French madeleine), from acquiring the full set of Infinity Stones, with which he'd have the power to end, or at least irrevocably alter, the universe.

after reading a few reviews i felt like i shouldn't bother watching this but it was fairly good with amazing cgi and good acting.

The film contains the same tacked - on humor, lame CGI that looks like it was from a 20 year old Pixar film, and characters that could not be more one - dimensional if the screenwriters tried.

The film contains the same tacked - on humor, lame CGI that looks like it was from a 20 year old Pixar film, and characters that could not be more one - dimensional if the

But I can see their point: Peter Rabbit's characters are anthropomorphized more than ever here, boasting a slick sheen of CGI and a sassy, sarcastic vocabulary that doesn't always feel like a good fit.

My only real big grip with the show is probably the CGI, its really bad but somehow i feel like it really adds to the campiness and cheesiness lf the whole thing.

CGI does work best for things like landscapes and pictures like this do show that fact off very well.

Despite the medium acting, the way too over the top and unrealistic action sequences, the bad CGI and the lack of great one - liners, the movie's biggest flaw is probably that it doesn't feel like a Die Hard movie.

While Harlin's big action sets in other films like Die Hard 2 suffered from an unfortunately dated sampling of CGI, everything you see in CutThroat Island has been constructed — and destroyed in grand fashion.

But if you're interested in watching some CGI creatures cause chaos while Johnson peppers in comments like, «Well, that's not good!»

After all of the interesting and fun effects of the preceding 110 minutes, the final effects make you wonder if the CGI folks pulled an all - nighter to rush this film out — like a cram session before a final exam.

It's well shot, edited, acted, scored... the CGI is really good, the vistas are occasionally breathtaking... but it seemed like it was part of a Chinese series that I wasn't familiar with, and so I became bored.

Jon Amiel's film is beautifully constructed and flawlessly integrates other techniques (documentary footage, time lapse photography, CGI effects) into what feels like a traditional period piece.

The CGI is horrible, this movie felt like a soap opera rather than a movie and the plot was just god

Too slow... CGI used as the lifeblood of the movie... and like Phantom Menace, you know you have to have a good story behidn all the neato computer images.

Between the CGI baby and continuing the the terrible storyline from part 1 it looked like it was headed for a 0 or 1.

While Iron Man 2 had some ups and downs like a rollercoasters, it still delivers high quality entertainment with its action scenes, less CGI, and solved the problems of the first Iron Man.

The CGI is horrible, this movie felt like a soap opera rather than a movie and the plot was just god awful.

Much like its loveable CGI star, Paddington 2 has proved to be that rarest of creatures, a sequel that surpasses the original, and now it's replicating the critical success at the box office.

I came into the film with a certain «checklist» of things that I expected from a popcorn blockbuster like Transformers... explosions, great set - pieces, great battle sequences, amazing cgi and 3D, and of course beautiful women, and was hugely satisfied with the film.

Once the Furious movies slipped the realism leash, they went from being pulpy B movies to something like blockbuster superstores — a one - stop - shopping center where you can sample Mission: Impossible - style assignments, MMA bouts (see Furious 7's Michelle Rodriguez and Ronda Rousey's formalwear tussle for a combo of both), A-list action heroes, gunfights, analog stunts, CGI spectacle, capeless superhero movies and a bit of broad comedy on the side.