There are proposals for a national funding formula although this,
like Local Government Funding reform, are the stuff of very lengthy and difficult consultation processes.
Not exact matches
1) Charities spend their income on necessities, such as food and utilities, which ever - so - slightly re-orients our economy toward recession - resistant products, rather than luxuries 2) Charities spend their money quickly, but on independent schedules, making for a smoother stimulus effect on the economy 3) Charities make purchases tax - free, meaning that $ 1 spent by a charity generates a full $ 1 of private economic activity; furthermore, much of those tax revenues are recovered as income tax on the grocery stores, utility companies, etc. that might not have received that income otherwise 4) Charitable giving is by far the most democratic way to improve society; from birth control to bombers,
government assuredly spends money on something you don't
like, and charitable giving restores your say - so 5) Charitable donations are tax deductible, meaning you keep those tax dollars in your
local community 6) Charitable donations provide the
funds necessary for volunteers to serve the needy, thus giving «the average citizen» a chance to meet and interact with the needy, breaking down stereotypes
«In a time when the American
government is failing to do its job, responsible
governments like New York State have to step up and find creative
local funding sources to take care of basic tasks
like running our subways and buses,» Raskin said.
Like the rest of
local government, counties have felt the effect of public sector
funding reductions.
«No other state in the country abuses its
local governments and taxpayers quite
like Albany to
fund an expansive Medicaid program,» Tenney said at a press conference today.
John Redwood as
Local Government Spokesman with a broader QUANGO slashing brief could deliver the savings needed to
fund essential tax cuts for those
like me who can not afford to live in Labour Britain.
Baynes notesthat rather than declaring bankruptcy or submitting to a state takeover by a financial control board, cities would
like to see state
government restore
funding to
local governments that has been cut in recent years.
«Individual country's
governments are not
funding individual scientists
like they used to, and people
like me, who are multidisciplinary, don't fit with
local country
funding programs,» she says.
Stamper would
like to see the federal
government put out requests for proposals and provide grants to develop best practices curriculum at the national level, although given the way our police forces are organized, he says,
local agencies would still have to pick up the tab for actual training, which means
fund appropriations from city or state politicians and taxpayers.
Because states
like Illinois have constitutional protections that lock in benefits for existing workers, the only way for state and
local governments to address
funding problems is to target new workers.
The consensus appears to be that these higher levels of performance have less to do with policy than with everything else: the «ecosystem» of reform in a given place (usually a city) and its network of «human - capital providers,» expert charter - management organizations, leadership - development programs, school - incubator efforts,
local funders and civic leaders, etc. — in other words, what conservatives
like to call «civil society»: the space between the
government and the individual (in this case, between
government and individual schools).
While the
government wants new groups to come forward to set up schools, it also wants all good existing schools to become academies - and
like the free schools, these will be
funded directly by Westminster and be outside of
local authority control.
They operate as academies, and
like them, do not have to follow the national curriculum, can vary the pay and conditions of teachers, are directly
funded by central
government and are outside of
local authority control.
The capitulation of
local publications
like this one to the travesty of releasing public
funds to private institutions without public oversight to perform
government services that are suppose to be available equally to EVERYONE, as said publications,
like this one, seek the favor of the powers that be is equavalent to how the national media rolled over and played dead during the lead up to the Iraq war.
County
governments are primarily responsible for providing buildings and infrastructure, but
local appropriations totaled $ 2.7 billion in operating
funds for things
like teacher salaries during 2014 - 15.
It is the first law enacted in over ten years that provides long - term
funding certainty for surface transportation, meaning States and
local governments can move forward with critical transportation projects,
like new highways and transit lines, with the confidence that they will have a Federal partner over the long term.
I would most compare it to a business
like private prisons and utilities, in that it is very capital intensive
like a utility, but it also relies on the inability of
local governments to
fund their own investment into infrastructure (such as what you see in private prisons.)
Institutions
like the Federal
Government, private companies and
local governments, issue bonds as a type of «IOU» to borrow money to
fund projects.
We do not receive
local or federal
government funding and are truly reliant on the generosity of supporters
like you.
The attention surrounding it has encouraged developers and
local government to launch and
fund new museums and cultural institutions,
like the Perez Art Museum Miami, a modern and contemporary art museum opened in 2002, and The Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts, Florida's largest performing arts center opened in 2006.
Lastly, the
government's proposal to
fund only state adaptation projects is blind - sighted to the need to encourage
local mitigation efforts that offer strong development co-benefits
like energy efficiency gains, energy security, and clean air.
Before the Stoneman Douglas massacre, the charter review board had hashed out 11 proposed charter amendments, covering items
like creating an affordable housing trust
fund, requiring
local governments to post meeting agendas and materials online at least 48 hours before a scheduled meeting and establishing new rules for redistricting county commission seats.
The Queensland
Government has advised the Aurukun and Mornington Island Shire Councils and the native title holders for the land comprising those shire leases that it would
like to amend the
Local Government (Aboriginal Lands) Act 1978 (Cth) in order to comply with the Australian
Government's
funding requirements and rules in relation to secure tenure for housing and long - term leasing.
Those taxes are the primary source of revenue for
local governments, and
fund local services
like schools, water systems and law enforcement.