If it really wanted to, Twitter could not only use its own algorithms to generate aggregated content in interesting ways, it could start to accumulate a suite of tools that allow users and even journalists to do the same — whether it's something
like Storify or Storyful (which has a paid - for Pro version that helps media companies verify and fact - check the content they are collecting) or another curation / discovery service like Prismatic or Percolate, or even a consumption and recommendation app like Flipboard.
To be clear, the post seems to be giving a thumbs up to services
like Storify and Favstar, but not to the traditional Twitter clients.
Not exact matches
Following some Twitter discussion (must get
Storify working properly for things
like this) Chris Berg pointed to a piece he'd written arguing against such a use of secondary boycott legislation (and against such legislation in general).
Judging by the comments in the
storified #FutureLaw Twitter stream it looks
like it was a very interesting and successful event.
Slaw has featured posts on capture using technology tools
like Evernote, and
Storify.
Relying on the evidence of the witnesses (the three above and a police constable qualified as an expert on Twitter), the judge defined around 30 terms including basics
like «handle» «follow» «retweet» and «hashtag», and more advanced ones
like «subtweet» «
storify» and «troll».
In the upper right - hand quadrant are services that enable users to interact with Tweets,
like the Tweet curation service
Storify or the Tweet discovery site Favstar.fm.