Sentences with phrase «like alarmist climate science»

Pontificate is correct, my English sometimes gets a little muddled like alarmist climate science — my apologies.

Not exact matches

Here is one example of a science - based response to the Rosie O'Donnell (a famous climate alarmist, by the way) and her claim that burning jet fuel can't melt steel so therefore the WTC had to have been destroyed by demolition charges set by Dick Cheney, or something like that.

For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.

The NY Times and Al Gore will not like this, but it is better to fight it out on the basis of the alarmists» invalid science rather than the moral wisdom of their alleged attempt to «save the world» from imaginary global warming / climate change due to human - caused CO2 emissions.

Climate alarmists can not argue the science, so you just defame them with smears like «climate denial&Climate alarmists can not argue the science, so you just defame them with smears like «climate denial&climate denial».

Alarmists accept far more science, it's skeptics by and large who seek to shutdown funding for climate science and deny things like the surface records and the use of climate models.

I don't think you do justice to the work of people like McIntyre and how their interaction with the hockey team and alarmist blogs such as Real Climate was instrumental in raising serious questions about the quality of the science underlying the dogma.

I though was referring to the alarmist propagandizing that goes on under the banner of government - funded climate «science», to be compared to the paltry few millions the likes of the Koch bros spend to introduce some questioning in the process.

I wrote something like 3000 words of indignation about climate alarmists corrupting the very definition of science by declaring their work «settled», answering difficult scientific questions with the equivalent of voting, and telling everyone the way to be pro-science is to listen to self - designated authorities and shut up.