Achieving a vision of excellence for all students continues to elude most districts, even as we learn more about what such change looks
like at the classroom level.
Not exact matches
Technologies
like DreamBox, a math education software that's used in a number of
classrooms across the US, adapts to each student's skill
level and lets students learn
at a pace best suited to their needs.
At the federal
level, the Department of Education can implement STEM as a requirement in America's
classrooms, and fund more initiatives
like Race to the Top, a $ 4 billion dollar program that to incentivizes states to develop next - generation educational standards.
... Things
like, I guess, wisdom and experience and being able to link concepts together, ask probing questions that encourage students to think
at a deeper
level, giving quality feedback... just because a teacher's recorded a video to explain a concept, doesn't necessarily mean that students have to watch that
at home - they could be watching that in the
classroom while the teacher's working with another student on something that can't be automated.
The issue with that is that if we have students in a
classroom who are ranging from below Low, barely able to read and make sense of their text, to students who are reading
at this Advanced
level, it is very difficult for a teacher to be able to teach to a class with that wide a variety of literacy
levels, and the problem is that these children who are not reaching the Low benchmark or are
at the Low benchmark are, if you
like, starting the race quite a long way behind all of these other kids.
For Tiers 2 and 3, students are not pulled out of the
classroom to form small groups
like at the elementary
level, since they would be missing crucial content in their classes.
Far from being a method of teaching reserved for only elementary -
level students, the notion of the interactive
classroom has been realised even
at the highest stages of education (we're talking tertiary institutions
like Harvard!)
Still, if states» higher standards and tougher tests are leading to real changes in the
classroom — especially as schools adopt high quality curriculum
like Eureka Math — we ought to start seeing a bump soon,
at least
at the fourth grade
level.
Even so, research on the
classroom performance of such children suggests that,
like Alex, the majority are required to work in the inclusion
classroom,
at levels several years below their tested ability (Hollingworth, 1926, 1942; Painter, 1976; Silverman, 1993; Gross, 1993).
You'll also choose among more than 50 practical workshops, for educators
at all
levels, devoted to topics
like school transformation, change leadership, inspirational feedback, cultivating student autonomy, building collaborative school culture, and reframing
classroom instruction to inspire learning
like never before.
Like the best
classroom teaching, the best adult professional learning is pitched
at the right
level for each person.
In addition to the rubric, we also set the intention to provide examples of what the practice looked
like in the
classroom at each
level.
The harder path of involving all teacher voices in identifying best practice in collaboration and calibrating on what does collaboration look
like in my
classroom at my grade
level will develop capacity in our system.
The network keeps significant decision - making
at the school
level,
like curriculum, staffing, budgeting, school and
classroom materials, and professional development.
I looked for how teachers integrated language and content instruction
at the same time, supported ELLs» access to grade -
level content, and built
classrooms in which all students felt
like they belonged.
Schools
at every
level were quick to reject digital textbooks because they felt
like they'd lost control over what materials were used in the
classroom, as though letting students use an ebook on a tablet would become a free - for - all of homemade, unvetted resources.