Sentences with phrase «like change of any kind»

An older dog usually doesn't like change of any kind, and a new creature in her territory can mean a big change.

Not exact matches

As we face future known threats like war and climate change, and unknown threats like an asteroid impact or new disease, Downey said that that's the kind of knowledge we should want to have.

The important lesson for brands of all kinds is that the advantage gained by first movers like Starbucks is now greater than ever, because the pace of market change is so rapid.

Barring that, the Star paywall will likely act like paywalls before it: as a significant but not transformational shift, the kind of thing that makes a lot of noise, but in the end doesn't change very much at all.

No matter what you think of his company and how it changed the world, it took a special kind of vision to be able to see what the world would look like in the future, back when most people were still rooted in a 20th - century, analog mindset.

On the downside: Buffett seems like the kind of guy to go all old - timey and change the spelling of «ketchup» to «catsup.»

At its best, a restaurant kitchen is like a strange kind of dance: you may know the steps, but the song can change every few seconds, so how you adapt makes all the difference.

Technologies like 3 - D printing and production concepts such as mass customization are allowing the kinds of changes in manufacturing not seen since the industrial revolution.

[O] nly companies like Target could engage in this kind of marketing,» he says in reference to Target's controversial marketing tactics which targeted expecting mothers with baby product ads based on their changing purchase habits, even before some were aware they were pregnant.

It's kind of like a kaleidoscope is really boring if it's two nice even things of glass; you need to get it to mix and change.»

Like many, he believes that the energy industry is on the cusp of the kind of change not seen since the internal combustion engine poured cold water on the steam era.

The way of the future is this: couriers like the USPS, FedEx and UPS will work with these kinds of cutting - edge technologies to drastically change the face of shipping.

To move that kind of big money, Harris began an organizational expansion of the foundation when she took over in 2010, building an outfit that has gone beyond Bloomberg's core interests of global public health and climate change to tackle new issues, like overfishing.

I was kind of like I said interested in gambling or at least speculating or figuring things out and then taking a calculated gamble and what they were telling me was don't try, there were saying that no one can beat the market and the stock prices are efficient and just through simple observation looking at the newspaper and they used to have the 52 - week high low prices in the newspaper, it seemed unreasonable that you know the fair price was 51 day and eight months later, it was 120, and that was pretty much every stock had that kind of range every year and it didn't make sense to me that the fundamentals of the underlying businesses were actually changing that much.

I think the kinds of suggestions on how to change the tax system like Mr. Gates suggests really come from that concern.

«This region has kind of ebbed and flowed in terms of the local capital available to these startups, but now angel networks like Carolina Angel Network are trying to change that.

It takes a while to get used to these kinds of changes, but like anything, once it's routine it's easy.

It does seem kind of like «hit - and - run» for you to post that you are considering changing on some major issues, but then potentially not give any reasons as to why.

My body and I had become unacquainted over the years — it was like meeting someone you went to school with years ago: you kind of recognize each other but really all you see are the changes.

It's kind of like Bono... you may hate his music and abhor his style, but the fact that he can affect change with his position is something that should be acknowledged, don't you think?

America needs to ween itself from this huge government jobs bailout and invest in positive investments like infastructure, Space exploration, subsidizing more clean energy programs and manufactures, changing our energy grid to be more flexible to different kinds of input, and education.

I think you see my point; changing religions is kind of like changing careers; people tend to do it over a period of time.

It's kind of like when I witnessed in our post office parking lot, a man change his baby's diaper in his car, then just throw the dirty diaper down outside his car.

I doubt the Abrahamic god was originally seen as anything like as powerful or kind as he is now, with the gradual change leading to some of theinconsistencies we see.

It is kind of like an Excel Spreadsheet: If you make an adjustment in one field, numerous other changes result throughout the entire table.

They can not defend their violent book, they can only turn to pages that contradict the violent parts and claim that God doesn't change except when he does because it's not a contradiction when he does it, kind of like when Nixon said «When the President does it, that means that it is not illegal.»

It's kind of like AA, where there is no change until you first admit the problem.

Like millions of other people who have been delivered from every kind of sin and affliction, I too took Jesus Christ up on His offer, and He supernaturally changed me forever.

In fact, judges all over the country should be changing the names of all the poor idiots with stupid names like «Janaenae» or «Duhwayne» or «Obama» ---- what kind of messed up parents name there kids these god awful names anyway?

Because the print out of the recipes and instructions is kind of confusing, I'd like to suggest that the layout of the doc that prints for these two recipes be changed to print out in the following order: Recipe 1 and instructions 1, THEN recipe 2 and instructions 2.

I love the kind of cake you're talking about, but like you say — when you've changed your food preferences, traditional cakes like that are just too sweet.

Looks like the kind of recipe you can change up anytime and it will still be delish.

You don't have to slit each olive or change the water or anything like that and best of all I think these are my favourite tasting olives too — they are kind of leathery and wrinkly, surprisingly they don't actually taste all that salty though!

This recipe is so easy to change up and you can use any kind of fruit you feel like, so far I've made a raspberry and a strawberry version of this cake too.

You can use any kind of berry you prefer, and have fun changing it up with different mix - ins like lemon juice or zest, orange juice or zest, vanilla bean seeds or extract, cinnamon, cardamom, and any other spices or extracts you enjoy.

Arsenal will only change with fans like this AOB keep backing this kind of shambolic signings and average palyers in our team.

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

what they have to do is be professional about their line of work but they can simply view it as their work and if you do nt like their performance as employee of the brand, you can demand change and criticise but just being disappointed with the results do nt give the fans the right to insult on such a low level like some guys on here and in this kind of view insulting a man who worked 20 years absolutely professionally for a club is just downright wrong, i never said you shouldnt criticise him

But enough about reminding you that wrestling companies can and will change their history at will to suit their story: what matters right now is that WWE is going to have a women's battle royal, and it sure sounds like the kind of thing we should get used to seeing.

With all the pressure on him, coming out to Sinead, the change in opponent, shiploads of his countrymen flocking out just to see him, and he still puts on that kind of showing, how can anyone criticize him without looking like a bias pompous is beyond me.

Nakamura might need the good match more here, as he's kind of been reduced to mostly an impressive entrance on the main roster of WWE — maybe that will change in a title match, and we'll see a Nakamura more like the one everyone was expecting WWE had signed.

This is the kind of article that highlights exactly what is wrong with this club as a whole... so the question you're asking is what option would be less shitty... after the firestorm surrounding Wenger's contract last season, which somehow led to his highly questionable re-upping for 2 more years, things needed to dramatically change or the inevitable same old, same old was bound to occur... as of right now the bare minimum has occurred... we knew about Sead long before Wenger's renewal so that can't be considered a part of the «new world order»... so the only real changes are Lehman coming into the coaching staff, which could be positive but he's always been a Wenger lackey so the jury is still out, and the acquisition of Lacazette, who I really like as a player but I question the reasoning behind his signing

I know that it's about protecting the money and the brand to milk it for everything it's worth and comments like this won't change that but their has to be some balance for the sake of maintaining any kind of legitimacy.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I kind of like the opposite qualities of walcot and Giroud and how it changes the game play and each brings a different dimension.

The answer is NO, the difference is these kind of players know when to.and.when not, so in that case like Wilshire himself keep saying hw will never change and will continue to get injured, not that he does not want to but simply because he does not possess the intelligence to..

not really making the news, the atmosphere on last wednesday was really strange, silent, step by step to normal football, but you can't throw away your thoughts immediately, I just got a glimpse of Enkes personality during a film of him shown before the match, I can't realize how hard it must be for his wife to lose him, tomorrow the players of Germans first Bundesliga will wear a black ribbon again, but I think it won't affect the atmosphere like it has with the national team despite of Hannover of course, people will be enthousiastic again, but there is the idea of an «Enke donation» which I like, will keep his name alive, will take some positive emotions on this tragedy and a kind of appeal for everyone to reflect the important things of life and control your own behaviour, I hope so at least, and I hope his wife will cope with that situation, and again: it was really hard for the German nationl team to play under these circumstances, to lose someone close in this way is hard to deal with, on the other hand it causes a close solidarity feeling I think, but of course the world will not change, things are returning to the old soon, but nonetheless for me this tragedy is a kind of human wake - up call, at least a call and then you continue

For all the talk about Arsenal are now something more than what they have been over the past decade or so — the kind of club that would find a legit star like a van Persie or a Sánchez only to let them go win titles elsewhere in England — moves like this latest transfer seem to say that Arsenal remain who they've long been, and they don't have much interest in changing that.

Players like Theo are a classic example of why we probably need some kind of root and branch change at the club.

If Aguero wasn't prepared to change his game, it likely would have been, particularly with Gabriel Jesus arriving at City in January and immediately displaying the kind of attributes Guardiola liked in a striker.