Not exact matches
A more reasonable natural variability / forcing argument might go something
like this: 1) There is natural variability of climate due to
solar activity 2) Climate is
changing now 3) Forcing can result
in climate
change, but the response of the C cycle to forcing is poorly understood 4) Forcing is happening now 5) Forcing and / or
solar activity could be to blame for current warming trends Is this unreasonable?
All evidence suggests that significant climate
changes like the LIA, and the Medieval Warm Period that preceded it, are the result of significant
changes in solar activity.
The red line incorporates natural influences
like changes in solar output and volcanic
activity but virtually all of the long - term warming is attributable to human - caused increases
in greenhouse gasses.
It is astounding that dangerous man - made global warming fanatics
like Obama and Prince Charles,
in addition to all those climate
change charlatans at various academies of science such as The Royal Society, prefer to ignore real word observational data on climate and
solar activity,
in favour of psuedo - science and climate models that consistently have failed
in their scenarios and projections.
«There's that odd cyclical behavior
in Holgate's sea level
change rate plots, which looks remarkably
like it's
in phase with
solar activity.»
Long - term trends and
changes (longer than
solar cycle) can partly be caused by long - term
changes of trend drivers of
solar / space weather origin
like geomagnetic
activity, which
in terms of the aa - index was increasing over almost the whole 20th century (e.g., Mursula & Martini 2006), even though now it is low.
There is a solid body of research now showing that any apparent slow - down of warming during the past decade was likely due to natural short - term factors (
like small
changes in solar output and volcanic
activity) and internal fluctuations related to e.g. the El Niño phenomenon.
http://www.agci.org/docs/lean.pdf «Global (and regional) surface temperature fluctuations
in the past 120 years reflect, as
in the space era, a combination of
solar, volcanic, ENSO, and anthropogenic influences, with relative contributions shown
in Figure 6.22 The adopted
solar brightness
changes in this scenario are based on a
solar surface flux transport model; although long - term
changes are «50 % larger than the 11 - year irradiance cycle, they are significantly smaller than the original estimates based on variations
in Sun -
like stars and geomagnetic
activity.
The term «radiative forcing» refers to a global energy imbalance on Earth, which may be caused by various effects
like changes in the greenhouse effect or
solar activity.