If neoclassical theism,
like classical theism, is unable to present its vision of God in a way which indicates that God favors the struggle of the oppressed, then the neoclassical alternative will be unacceptable to black theology.
Not exact matches
The letter showed that my rejection of
classical theism was something
like an elaborated repetition of what Father went through fifty or sixty years earlier.
I portrayed them, correctly I think, as remaining obsessed — albeit negatively — with the
classical god of metaphysical
theism, while I was talking about Someone Else, the mysterious and elusive Other of the prophets and Jesus, who —
like Jacques Brel — was very much alive although living in unexpected quarters.
Classical theism is a beautiful way of thinking about thinking, and for those who are passionate about pure thought, there is no idea more beautiful than the idea that God is
like our ideas.
Like the other two, and with equal definiteness and eloquence, he rejected
classical theism (without so naming it) 3 because of its failure to protect freedom in our relation to God.
Two traits of
classical theism were that it either (
like Stoicism and Spinozism) clearly and consistently denied human freedom (in the straightforward sense of actions being not wholly determined by their causal conditions) or else ambiguously or contradictorily affirmed and denied causal determinism — truly classically in Aquinas's statement that God strictly causes our actions but in such fashion that we were also free to act otherwise.
It may sound
like a strange idea, yet it resonates with a great many theologians who reject «
classical theism,» the broadly Platonist....