Sentences with phrase «like current system»

The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, or AMOC, is a powerful conveyor - like current system that carries warm water north from the equator and sends cool water back down from the Arctic.

The interior is dominated by a 1280 × 720 - pixel seven - inch TFT LCD instrument display that shows a range of digital gauges in high resolution, including a number of hybrid - specific displays like the current system operation or status.

Alternative Vote (AV) How it works: Like the current system, voters are grouped in the same constituencies, which each return one MP.

If you like the current system vote no.

Those sorts of businesses that have direct relationships with their producers are clearly going to be better for the eaters as they serve as a kind of conduit between the two, rather than a brick wall like the current system (I'm looking at you, ColesWorths).

Not exact matches

The ship has a number of new technologies, like the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System, which is intended to replace the current steam - powered launch system on current aircraft carSystem, which is intended to replace the current steam - powered launch system on current aircraft carsystem on current aircraft carriers.

It's reported that like the current iPhone X, these phones will feature the «fullscreen,» minimal notch design with the TrueDepth Camera system.

«There are a lot of criticisms you can make of the current «charity» system that exists because of the tax deduction for contributions: a lot of recipient organizations do little good for society, some do harm (like the NRA's 501 (c)(3)-RRB-, and the tax deduction directs money from productive investments to mega-rich institutions like Harvard University.

But in the current U.S. corporate governance system, only investors and their fiduciaries (like BlackRock) have a voice.

Like the one Jinwoong's Scott Reeves points to as a current favorite, a simple project - management tool he calls a «product - development system,» a calendar that enables managers to keep better track of key deadlines as they create multiple new products.

If you destroy the current publication system, there will still be publications that are «over-valued», just like in every other market.

No matter what, outsized prizes like the current Powerball payoff should make us reflect on how noncompetitive, unfair and predatory the current system is.

Chowly integrates third - party online ordering systems like Grubhub, Eat24 and many others» orders into a restaurant's current point - of - sale system so the staff doesn't have to enter them manually.

Current government policy was «not to run large operational pieces of infrastructure like an eLoran system», he added.

Examples of such projects providing marginal benefits are: improving financial reporting systems through better information technology, minor tweaks to supply chain logistics, cutting back on marketing or increasing low - cost advertising (like social media), «rationalization» of head count, holding average wages as low as possible, squeezing suppliers a little bit, not repatriating earnings to stave off taxation, refinancing rather than retiring debts, and the share buyback that is insensitive to a company's current stock price.

Rather than doing away with the need for a CCP like The Clearinghouse or Euroclear, this blockchain essentially acts as an uber - CCP with all the collateral, margin and regulatory capital requirements associated with the current transaction clearing system.

While I've got a new comment open, though, here's my thoughts on the Roth debate: It's generally good to diversify your funds as much as possible, tax-wise; nobody can say with absolute certainty what the tax system will look like numerous years from now (although the smart money says that it'll probably be even more complex than our current system).

Although one could imagine all sorts of radical Blue Sky tax reforms — or much less radical ideas like a carbon tax or a value added tax — in the context of the current debate about how to make some alterations to the current tax system, I would suggest the following five elements in the spirit of 1986:

The technology, he said, threatens to disrupt existing systems much like «the current TCP / IP, Packet Switching was able to defeat the giants such as AT&T.»

In order to process a bitcoin - denominated transaction, Bitcoin verifies two facts addressed by current payment systems like PayPal or Visa.

Current payment systems, like credit cards and PayPal, require an intermediary to validate transactions; Bitcoin does not.

The group believes the bill should also cover semi-automated systems like Tesla's Autopilot - a lower level of technology than what is included in the current proposed legislation.

You don't like Christians having to change their belief system to fit into the current worldview around them; to you it seems like they are trying to please those same people (make them feel comfortable) and at the same time dis - honoring God (changing His word).

This could happen only if the guilty person were by nature endowed with extraordinary stupidity, and presumably by shouting in antistrophic and antiphonal song every time someone persuaded him that now was the beginning of a new era and a new epoch, had howled his head so empty of its original quantum satis of common sense as to have attained a state of ineffable bliss in what might be called the howling madness of the higher lunacy, recognizable by such symptoms as convulsive shouting; a constant reiteration of the words «era,» «epoch,» «era and epoch,» «epoch and era,» «the System»; an irrational exaltation of the spirits as if each day were not merely a quadrennial leap - year day, but one of those extraordinary days that come only once in a thousand years; the concept all the while like an acrobatic clown in the current circus season, every moment performing these everlasting dog - tricks of flopping over and over, until it flops over the man himself.

«Innovation in the plant - based food space is propelled by foundational and informative books like this that expose the flaws in our current food system.

To me, the best point in this discussion is made by Stewart Mandel: whether we like it or not, the current system is designed so that any talk of resumes is meant to determine who plays in the national title game.

Unless Arsenal can create such system that will force their players to work harder to help their teammates, a more skillful, pacey, hardworking and tricky attacking midfielder like Isco / Thiago / De Bruyne is more suitable for Arsenal's current system

playing with g - rod up front is like sticking to fingers up to traditional arsenal play of fast movement one twos and pass and move football this is very unlike wenger to make such a major shift away front his normal trends of style of play big man up front with no pace just isn't the wenger way really he needs to go back to the past really to answer the current problem i have noticed all the other top 4 teams are more wenger they are (wengerites to coin a phrase) than wenger himself playing with a big srtong pacey team like we use to have they all copied wengers blueprint and left him behind somewhere along the line and he altered his and its not been the same since do nt change a winning system of power and pace if it is was working for you mr wenger

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I actually feel in our current system Ramsey would be best behind the striker, like where he plays for Wales.

As we saw prior to the implementation of the current foreign - born amateur spending system, where clubs like the Twins, Padres, A's, and Blue Jays regularly outspent their high - revenue rivals.

They also want to scrap the new system that allows an NPB team to cancel a posting if they don't like the contract the player signs: Under that rule, NPB teams receive a percentage of a player's contract, rather than the current $ 20 million maximum.

If the veteran free agents aren't going to make money under the current system, like they didn't this offseason, there's only one way to fix that.

If nothing materializes, so be it, but I know I'm not the only one hoping the CIF at least looks at ideas like this one before ordering more of the current system.

However if Wenger, or whoever is in charge next season, sticks to the current system, I see no reason why Gibbs would fall out of the team, unless the manager would prefer to have two more attack minded players playing the wing back rolls, much like the Ox is experiencing.

Wenger's system is similar to the current France national football team or French teams in general, but Arsenal do not have many skillful players like them.

I would like to see some changes to the current system so that fewer of the top teams play each other in the opening rounds.

I would love to have a Dutch system where everyone is capable of joining attack when needed and defending when is needed, but there is no way in hell someone like Nasri, Cesc or Wilshire will outmuscle someone like Drogba or another tank, so Song has to stay back and be responsable for tanks... we cant do this current system of allowing our defensive rock dissapearing in the final third leaving Wilshire or Cesc / Nasri to deal with counterattacks or fighting a target man for a 50/50.

You may recall that the original impetus for focusing on this previously unexplored set of skills, in How Children Succeed and elsewhere, was the growing body of evidence that, when it comes to long - term academic goals like high - school graduation and college graduation, the test scores on which our current educational accountability system relies are clearly inadequate.

Our current maternity care system's disconnected and medical treatment of birth is what's causing the need for more medical and surgical intervention and emergency situations in the first place; it leads into a cascade of further interventions and more serious problems like the high rates of maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality that plague the United States.

I don't think midwives should be practicing without a clear hierarchy, with OB / GYN at the helm, and I do not think the current system serves women well, especially not first time mums like myself who had NO IDEA that I would receive subpar care.

Specifically, the SNA is asking to: keep the level of whole grains in the total number of grain foods served at 25 %; avoid further reductions in sodium; eliminate the requirement that kids take fruit or a vegetable with their meal (returning to the old system in which kids could — and often did — pass up those healthful foods); and allow schools to sell on a daily basis a la carte items like pizza and fries, as opposed to the current plan which would allow these items to be sold only on the same day they appeared on the main lunch line.

We spoke for over an hour about school food (lunch and breakfast) and issues like nutritional content, food and nutrition education, and the issue of universal food («free for all») versus the current three - tier system in school meals.

However, I guess one might then anticipate greater support for the three current major parties to counter that, and the effect might be somewhat countered by using AV + and STV systems which can tend to reward more pluralist parties with broader support who can win transfers, as against non-preferential PR systems (like those in Scotland and Wales) which may be more prone to fragmentation.

Not having a two party system is probably also helping to suppress it - our current wannabe demagogue is named Pauline Hanson, and she's relegated to a minor party (although she likes to publicly make - believe that her party will form government at the next election).

@RobertHarvey no, because to be elected again they need to act like they like dogs while in office under the current system or check a box under the proposed one.

Republicans wouldn't like this solution, as it advantages Democrats (in the same way that the current system advantages Republicans).

He'd also like to see an end to vacancy decontrol and a revamp of the 421 - a program that takes the neighborhood Area Median Income into consideration, as opposed to the current system that includes New York City and the wealthier areas of Westchester, Putnam and Rockland Counties.

«If residents feel like government officials are gaming the system in some way, they have every right to ask if current standards, practices and oversight are sufficient,» said Brandon Muir, who leads the Manhattan good - government organization Reclaim New York.

It is also quite clear that our current system vests far too much power in the government, power which has been continually used to ignore the people's wishes on issues like the EU, immigration and has allowed the unimpinged growth and expansion of government.