I think this is
like debating between two pretty good companies.
Like the debate between formula and breast milk, the best kind of baby is a fed baby, whether it's mama or daddy doing the feeding.
Passages
like these debate between Fates and faith, reflecting the way science often converges on the spiritual.
Not exact matches
At the very least, it seems
like a good bet to top the previous ratings record for presidential
debates, set in 1980, when 80.2 million people tuned in to watch the first
debate between Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter.
They shouldn't even have these types of
debates because it convinces dolts
like this poster above that there's actual parity
between the two sides.
Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think
like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and
debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and
debated the common themes as well as the differences
between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..
Resolving the issues
between Judaism and Christianity through this kind of «unfulfilled messianism» sounds to me somewhat
like resolving the
debate between capitalism and communism by eliminating the idea of private property.
There is even a
debate between those who think the devotee depends entirely on God's grace,
like a kitten picked up by its mother, and those who think some human effort is also required
like a baby monkey who has to cling on to its mother.
At times the
debate about religious language seems
like a pitched battle
between political camps of the left and the right.
Or, if you prefer philosophical examples, consider the recent
debates between proponents of a unified cognitive science, a science that would demonstrate mental events to be either strictly identical with physical events or epiphenomena of them — people
like Daniel Dennett and Patricia Churchland — and those who think that there is a philosophically irreducible difference
between the physical and the mental — that is, people
like Thomas Nagel and John Searle.
Making distinctions
like these»
between natural, positive, and civil rights, and
between just and unjust discrimination» is crucial to healthy public
debate.
The abortion
debate often feels
like being
between a rock and a hard place, so political statements
like «abortion should be safe, legal and rare,» offer us the slight comfort of a perceived middle ground.
I
like the connection, intentional or not,
between the travesty in Uganda and the state of the
debate.
Do nt get me wrong he is a goodplayer, at the end of the day it isnt really bringing something they do nt already have or could get
between Oscar, Willian, Cuadrado and at extreme Mo Salah I mean the f # cked of people
like De Brueyn and Schurle who are similar types of players and while it can be put to
debate as who is better out of the three, the difference in ability isn't that vast.
But we would give the
likes of Szczesny how many chances as ours FIRST TEAM keeper and even now we are
debating between selling him (4/5 season as number 1 keeper where he has made countless unforced errors leading to goals conceded) or Ospina (who has been with us ONE season and put in a decent shift good enough to be Cech backup in my view)
The Warwick
debate started just
like all the other travesties of this sort, with the dull thud of comparison
between offence, psychological damage and warnings of disorder.
It is easy to form our opinions of the
debate and on the differences
between the Presidential candidates on excerpts
like this and memorable one - liners.
13 % would prefer
debates between just Cameron and Miliband as the only potential Prime Ministers, 19 % to have three way
debates with Clegg
like last time.
Nevertheless, the pay raise issue is now part of the
debate on the campaign trail, especially for candidates who face tough battles
like the one
between Niccoli and Amedore.
As primary day quickly approaches, it looks
like there will not be a
debate in the 22nd Congressional District race
between Republican opponents Rep. Richard Hanna and Assemblywoman Claudia Tenney.
Paul and Christie tangled in a passionate
debate over government surveillance that highlighted the wide gulf in the Republican Party
between libertarian - leaning Republicans
like the Kentucky senator and national security hawks
like the New Jersey governor.
At the time of its launch, the link
between chlorine - containing chemicals
like CFCs and the thinning ozone layer was intensely
debated, and UARS was designed in part to explore that issue.
From the news coverage of a new study concluding that Neandertals,
like modern humans, engaged in symbolic behavior, you might think the study settles a long - standing
debate between researchers who think Neandertals were stupid and those who think they were smart.
The prospects for the habitability of M - dwarf planets have long been
debated, due to key differences
between the unique stellar and planetary environments around these low - mass stars, as compared to hotter, more luminous Sun -
like stars.
It seems
like there was a
debate taking place
between Rosedale and Jaminet a couple of years ago.
I'm
debating ordering a set but can't decide which pattern I
like best — I think it's
between this and this.
I was initially
debated between getting it or another piece and when I asked G what he thought, he took one look at this and said, «that looks exactly
like something you would wear.»
Instead, as the various seminars and lectures on subjects as diverse as Walden and rocket science, it's a film of ideas, darting effortlessly
between debates on society, race, class, politics and much, much more, while adding up to something that feels
like a coherent piece of work.
«London Has Fallen» wastes no time
debating the justness of such a collateral damage - inflicting remote attack — thereby delivering a definitive answer to the drone - centric ethical question at the heart of next week's «Eye in the Sky» — because,
like its»90s forbears, it embraces the hardline notion that there's a fundamental moral difference
between the actions of America (and its allies) and its sadistic adversaries.
Libby Purves, on her Theatrecat website, noted the ideological
debates between Tom and Kyra felt at times «
like being beaten round the head with a copy of the Guardian».
Collectively they feel
like a triumph over the long - simmering tension
between art and commerce —
between personal expression and commercial concerns — that has seen renewed
debate in the film industry as artists endeavor to make movies that feel
like more than another episode in a series.
So you'll get little treats
like someone name - dropping Dumbledore or a reference to those great Ilvermorny versus Hogwarts
debates we know have occurred
between many a magical student.
Indignation The long
debate between Lerman and Letts is as great as advertised, but it oddly feels
like it has been airlifted in from a very different film.
The remainder of the film jumps back and forth redundantly
between increasingly shouty
debates of this ilk and ever more questionable missions, as Graver and Alejandro are revealed to have an almost God -
like grasp on affairs and the cost of fighting drugs is hammered home again and again.
And there is something strangely warming about the relationship
between Mr Numbers and Mr Wrench, a pair of assassins (one of whom is deaf) who bicker in sign language
like an old married couple as they
debate gangster etiquette, the importance of public libraries, and the eating practices of Mormons.
Like so many
debates in our politics today, we are witnessing a battle
between two extreme ideological views.
The Download (comprising 4 files, within one zip file) includes: - A PPT Containing a Full Lesson - A complete lesson plan covering: objectives, key - words, differentiation, and lesson timeline - Double - sided A4 worksheet - A3 Silent
Debate group worksheets - A Homework Task The topic of the lesson focusses on the following part of the specification: Human Concerns [Duties / Virtues / Yamas] • Hindu understanding of the concepts of free will, suffering and virtue, including their relationship to karma and samsara • The meaning and importance of Hindu virtues / moral duties (yamas), including harmlessness / non-violence (Ahimsa), compassion (daya), selfcontrol / restraint (dama) and giving (dana) • The relationship
between virtues and particular elements of dharma • Common and divergent emphases placed on human concerns by different Hindu groups, including which virtues are identified as of core importance • Different interpretations and emphases given to sources of wisdom and authority by different Hindu groups Sources: Mahabharata V 39 Bhagavad Gita XVI, 1 — 3 Bhagavad Gita VIII 8 — 12 This is part of a series of lessons, if you
like it: save countless hours by downloading the complete course!
While it might seem hard to compare such different strategies, the heart of the larger school - reform
debate is
between systemic reforms
like the portfolio model and resource - oriented strategies.
The current
debate between business - minded reformers
like Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York and former Washington, D.C. chancellor Michelle Rhee and their critics has often been set up as a...
We were
debating between the Ford Escape and the Mercury Mariner and decided on the Mariner because we
liked the look better and the price for the features.
I would love you to weigh in on the «
debate»
between folks
like Kristine Katheryn Rusch, who advocates for significantly higher prices, more careful discounting and ZERO promotional effort until an author has a decent backlist; and the Mark Coker types whose promotional guide champions a multi-pronged, full - force marketing plan worthy of a multimillion dollar corporation.
After the tragic Columbine shooting in 1999, a strong focus was put on the shooter's love of violent video games
like Doom, sparking a national
debate over the correlation
between video game violence and violent tendencies.
I also bore witness to a large
debate between school staff over how to pronounce the «@» symbol (some though it was
like «a», others «at»).
The way you strategize and rationalize internally, the
debates between characters on who the traitor might be, tipping the scales in your favor to get the best result; it plays
like an interactive game of Survivor, but the stakes are much more life threatening.
People have long
debated the relationship
between the visual arts and sign systems or mathematics and art — and not just those
like Jenny Holzer, Lawrence Weiner, or R. Luke DuBois who treat text as art.
Nevertheless provocative and
debate - stirring, documenting the
likes of the New York S & M scene, Saints and Sinners allows the viewers to dig into the works and determine the connections
between the snap pairs of pictures Sean Kelly match up, sometimes obviously and at other times with more of a challenging ambiguity.
Roughly, I'd guess the
debates over global climate change took place largely
between 1981 and 1995; a good bit shorter than the
debates over continental drift, but then there was less radical about the idea of global climate change — it was already known that the planet's climate had changed in the past, so the idea that it might be changing in the present was less radical than the idea that the vast continents might, in fact, be drifting
like huge floating islands.
There have been a couple of posts which address the difference
between the «
debate» in the newspapers, and the «noble search for truth» that scientists
like to think we indulge in (slightly tongue in cheek there)-- For instance, What If... the «Hockey Stick» Were Wrong?
Science is always going to provide ammunition to everyone in the
debate — the naysayers and the apocalyptics and the people in
between — because science is
like that.
There is a disconnect
between Idso's defense and Doney's offense which was itself very measured in its use of language and imminence, so it looks
like posting Idso somewhat misses the target of the actual
debate within the science.