Not exact matches
theoldadam it is because of completely
dishonest comparisons
like yours that
people are rightly leaving the church in droves.
Even if I learned that God really doesn't exist, I would still want to follow the basic principles of trying to live as a Christian because of the joy my actions bring to myself and others by always trying to put others first instead of being selfish and / or
dishonest to get what I want
like so many
people who have no faith choose to do,
I no longer believe because I am done listening to
people claim to have answers they don't have, it is
dishonest, irresponsible, immoral and can be dangerous I am glad you trust science, to a point, but when science is not able to provide an answer you insert god and
like I said, that is lazy.
I DO NT
like drama,
dishonest people, game players etc.. I have a 3 year old son and his father does not pose a problem.My mate / partner has to love kids cause my son is VERY important to me.
This might seem
like a no - brainer, but there are still
people who create online dating profiles that are vague, incorrect, or just downright
dishonest.
But the number one problem
people seem to run into on mobile and online dating sites is feeling
like they've been deceived by
dishonest photos / profiles, so the most important thing you can do to increase your chances of success is to be honest, and be yourself.
i
like romani too.i hate liers, cheaters and
dishonest people.
l am kelvin williams from Nigeria, l am the only child of my parent, l am a student, am single, my hobbies are playing football, lawn tennis and also good in track event, l
like responsible and decent
people and hate
dishonest and indiscipline
people, don't spend your life to buy money because you can not s...
Grounded and nuanced by Sally Field, she feels
like a real
person, making mistakes and never above being a little selfish and
dishonest.
Good casinos,
like exemplary auto dealerships, treat
people honestly (but always are on the lookout for
dishonest patrons); emphasize customer satisfaction; and make a lot of money.
It is not surprising that scientists, who are not known to suffer fools gladly, to say the same thing in a different way,
like most intelligent
people are impatient with nonsense, are more than tired of posturing, whether naive or
dishonest.
When so many CAGW alarmists are so
dishonest,
like you and several other regular bloggers here, why would any rational
person trust any of your scaremongering beliefs?
The
people who malign them —
like Cuccinelli and others — are the
dishonest ones.
It is intellectually
dishonest to devote several pages to cherry - picking studies that disagree with the IPCC consensus on net health effects because you don't
like its scientific conclusion, while then devoting several pages to hiding behind [a misstatement of] the U.N. consensus on sea level rise because you know a lot reasonable
people think the U.N. wildly underestimated the upper end of the range and you want to attack Al Gore for worrying about 20 - foot sea level rise.On this blog, I have tried to be clear what I believe with my earlier three - part series: Since sea level, arctic ice, and most other climate change indicators have been changing faster than most IPCC models projected and since the IPCC neglects key amplifying carbon cycle feedbacks, the IPCC reports almost certainly underestimate future climate impacts.
Like it or not, if you don't directly address these accusations, the impression lay
people are left with is that the whole thing smacks of
dishonest use of peer review.
The legal industry,
like any other industry, has its share of blamers, exaggerators, and generally
dishonest people.