Sentences with phrase «like errors in him»

You are probably already aware that basic mistakes like errors in spelling or grammar are going to undermine your resume, but you might not realize there are more subtle errors that can cost you even more.

Form miscalculations, like errors in the amount of tax credits or deductions you're claiming, the amount you owe the IRS, or the amount they owe you as a tax refund.

On the contrary, prudent strategies often look like errors in the short to medium term, while many bone - headed moves are rewarded with outstanding returns, at least for a while.

Simon Mignolet has De Gea-esque displays in his locker, but he also has a fair few Massimo Taibi - like errors in him!

If you find a mistake, like an error in your address, you can log in to fafsa.ed.gov to update that information.

However, since the analytical functions can be fitlered correctly and to a good precision, it seems illogical to insert a known error onto those functions is the hope that it may be a bit like the error in incorrectly filtering the time - series.

Not exact matches

Professor Zhu Chaodong, the Institute of Zoology's lead scientist in insect evolution studies at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, said it would be a «catastrophe» if billions of cockroaches were suddenly released into the environment — be it through human error or a natural disaster like an earthquake that damaged the building.

Shift from using intuition, gut instinct, and trial and error to using a systematic process like we lay out in the book.

Because so much of its business is tied up in a few particular styles, a single manufacturing error — like the one that forced executives to recall the near - seethrough women's pants in March — can cause millions of dollars in lost sales.

The margin of error is like fishing with a net; somewhere in your catch is the true figure.

Savvy leaders like Apple's Eddy Cue are willing to correct errors in judgment when contractors like Taylor Swift draw attention to unfair corporate policies.

While research from the American Medical Association showed that 7.1 percent of all claims paid by insurers in 2013 contained a mistake, patient advocates and other professionals who review medical claims for accuracy put the frequency of billing errors at more like 80 percent or even 90 percent.

Like Alina Tugend's Better By Mistake, another book recently featured in this column, Adapt explores the role that error plays in creating successes.

«Certainly you can imagine that it could have been a covert way of communicating data in a way that looked like an error,» Hall said.

Like most aspects in life, you want to allow some margin for error.

In industries like accounting where human workers handle and manage tasks such as verifying records and confirming the truthfulness of transactions, it is possible that human error or individuals with ill incentives manipulate records or create fraudulent records that are not an accurate representation of transaction history.

In addition to the standard types of coverage like general liability insurance or property insurance, the operational risks that tech companies face trigger insurance needs that are solved by more nuanced lines of coverage like technology errors and omissions insurance and cyber liability insurance.

There's no room for error in terms of valuations, and it's that kind of cocktail that gives us a sell - off like we're having today.

No doubt many of you sharp - eyed readers will have spotted a spelling error, thinking I intended to refer to one of these: But, in fact, I really did have in mind something more like this: We are following an example from the recently published Mathematica Beyond Mathematics by Jose Sanchez Leon, an up - to - date text that...

In a choice between upping the price to meet increased demand and maintaining regular prices so as not to be accused of price gouging — as Uber typically is accused of doing if the company keeps its surge pricing on during high - volume events like this — the company decided to avoid the errors of its past.

I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent being that ignorance is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless of creed, away debating over who's God is better and discover the error of our ways before we destroy each other... before it's too late, because The End is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack of education, which is exactly what leads to this kind of debate?

Our workflows are not as efficient as they could be, and the number of errors that occur in tasks like data entry, routing invoices, matching POs and supporting audit requirements are too high.

Their conclusions are heavily scrutinized in the scientific community and an error like you suggest would be easily pointed out and embarrassing for the writer of the paper.

Mozart was divinely destined to die young, an impossible prodigy appearing and vanishing like a flash of lightning crossing the heavens, while it was ordained from everlasting that Haydn should enjoy a serene longevity in which to unfold his genius; Keats grown old would have been a drastic error of taste on the part of providence, while it was absolutely necessary that Wordsworth begin as a «lyrical» radical but end up a withered Tory sage penning sonorous banalities.

Atheists don't treat him like god, so if there are errors in his theories, we don't say «well Darwin is All knowing and All wise, so it MUST be true».

A large part of the problemvwhen discussing issues like this is that we utilize aristotalian language constructs that are dualistic and a major sign of this would be the use of the word «is,» when to be linguistically scientifically correct everything should be stated as «it appears so to me,» or some variation of this as it takes into account the many errors possible in how people perceive everything.

Jim, I have always liked the wisdom of on this website: The Wrong Way to Read the Bible http://theresurgence.com/2010/10/10/the-wrong-way-to-read-the-bible Two opposite errors exist in approaching the Bible.

Like their namesake, Lutherans have been eager to separate themselves from the errors both of the papists and of those whose opposition to popery was not, in their eyes, as astute, precise, and nuanced as their own.

I appreciate your apparent openess to discussion and the ability to recognize a superior literary intellect:) I also consider myself to be open to divergent thought and conversation, and would like to think I'm capable of change when my views are in error.

If Christianity would stop making it so ridiculously easy to find such fatal errors in their ways, legitimate news sources like CNN wouldn't have to report and «attack» them in the first place.

Family, friends, neighbors, co-workers and acquaintances from high school we stalk on Facebook all press us with the idea that we've got little margin for error in our twenties — that life should play out like a clear - cut script.

I too like the think of our existence in a computer - type model, and being a programmer, I can tell you it's neccessary to set the attributes of every possible interaction, as any unexpected collision will result in a fatal error.

The error of that claim is, however, quickly exposed in both great tragedies like Macbeth and canonic musings like that of a Southern Baptist:

Since Jesus is the main revelation of God in this view (which I agree with), they sometimes then go on to say that anything in the Old Testament which doesn't look like Jesus is therefore an error.

But the theological error that underlies this idealization of violence leads them into a new, a sociopolitical Manicheanism which (like the earlier, metaphysical Manicheanism) is also an idealism, a simplifying resource to help people participate in a complicated world where, they know, they had better do what the powers that be recommend and take sides.

I'd also like you to elaborate on these errors that you've found in the Bible... I'd be happy to discuss them with you in a civil and respectful manner.

Just another religious ERROR like in the Bible?

supernatural events are NOT exclusive to HUGE events... like global flood, etc etc.... and just cause there are a FEW errors (supposedly) in the regional stuff, that is no reason to throw the baby out with the bath water.thats not how history works..

But the error in this view becomes obvious, for Bergson believes, like James, that upon introspection of our conscious lives we find the components of consciousness related internally; we find a penetration of the felt past and the anticipated future in the present.

For those of you who are interested in reading the arch of a sad, sad bitter life, crusie through the remarks by «the son a Piper man» aka Tom Tom, Stands for nothing, hates everything, curses when left with nothing to say, then hysterically claims victory for hurting someone's feelings, and stands for nothing, but will gladly point out your poor syntax, grammar and spelling errors like a weary retired 3rd grade teacher.

If you have not repented then you are in error (in spite of all your accusations) If you have repented and have called upon the Almighty God to save you and cleanse you from your sin, Then what is the purpose of these letters (unless you want to pass judgment on those that do not believe like you).

Yes, there are some minor errors in things like, the number of horses Solomon had.

Global warming, the ozone hole, overpopulation, starvation and malnutrition, war, unemployment, the destruction of species and the rain forests, pollution of water and air, pesticide and herbicide poisoning, errors in genetic engineering, erosion of topsoil, overfishing, anarchy and crime, the possibility of a nuclear mishap, chemical warfare or all - out nuclear war: together, or in some cases singly, these dangers threaten to «catch us unexpectedly, like a trap.»

Like Christian heresies, the error of each is the error of all: an attempt at simplifying, by seizing upon one aspect of the whole, a complex system of counterweights that has kept Judaism In balance.

The point, rather, is that Steven Weinberg and people like him are committing a grave error in historical interpretation when they posit a causal relationship between secularization and the advance of modern science.

Like Pinnock, and for that matter Schaeffer and Lindsell, Daniel Fuller holds with the Lausanne Covenant that the Bible is «without error in all that it affirms.»

As the Lausanne Covenant asserts, the Bible is «without error in all that it affirms» Although detailed inerrantists like John Montgomery and Harold Lindsell resist referring to the writer's intentions as a criterion for Biblical judgment, sensing, rightly, that its adoption undermines their position, they nevertheless use such a standard on occasion (see Lindsell's discussion of differences in Biblical numbers [Num.

At the other end of the evangelical spectrum from Lindsell and Schaeffer are those like Dewey Beegle and Stephen Davis who believe that one must admit there are errors in the text of Scripture, even in areas related to the author's intention.24 Such errors, however, do not involve any of the basics of the faith.

I do like the progressive Christian stance as you describe it — that there may be error in many of the books of the bible — but that people, even with our limited minds, can strive to see a more perfect vision than what was written.

Whitehead turns out to be right: the presumed «exactness» of logic is a fake, and Russell was no more or less prone to error or excess through employing it than were other philosophers (like Whitehead) who eschewed it — a point Russell seems later to concede in his account of his subsequent «Retreat from Pythagoras» (BR, p. 54).