Stop wasting money on things that do no good
like ethanol from corn.
Speaking of a bio-based economy, did the push for biofuels
like ethanol from corn make farming's problems worse?
Not exact matches
Ethanol from places
like Corn Plus travels by barge or railroad to distribution terminals, then is combined with gasoline at the rack where tanker trucks load up.
But the problem is that most of the
ethanol we have right now is when it is talked about it being a first generation biofuel; that is that
ethanol fuel is coming
from the fermentation of sugars
from crops
like corn.
Chemists at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory are closing in on cheap ways to make cellulosic
ethanol, a form of
ethanol derived
from agricultural waste rather than food crops
like soybeans or
corn.
The United States expanded its federal biofuels mandate in a 2007 law to reach 36 billion gallons by 2022, with up to 15 billion gallons coming
from corn ethanol and the balance
from so - called advanced biofuels
like cellulosic
ethanol.
This problem can become even bigger for biofuels
like corn ethanol that emit greenhouse gases at every step,
from laughing gas emanating
from corn fields after fertilization to the CO2
from the fermentation of kernels into
ethanol.
The E. coli can be grown in large fermentation tanks, exactly
like those used to brew
ethanol from corn, and have also been genetically tweaked to tolerate high concentrations of BDO in their water.
If she can perfect the process, it could lead to inexpensive biofuels that are made
from inedible crops — not
from corn like most of today's
ethanol.
Where will that energy come
from if we make many more poor choices
like corn ethanol (a systems analysis of which showed that it took more total energy to produce than it delivered).
This extra water use stems
from the irrigation of crops
like corn that are turned into
ethanol, or in the production of the electricity for recharging hybrids.
The illustrious green movement who killed nuclear power in 1970s and brought about global warming by scrubbing shade - producing particulates
from smokestacks and tailpipes are now bent on using a ginned up catastrophic climate change scenario to keep the price of oil elevated in order to keep the profit incentive alive for stupid expensive alternatives
like windmills and
ethanol from corn.
They say the technological fixes also distract
from more challenging social reforms
like slowing the rate of population growth, shifting away
from crops
like corn ethanol that don't put food on the table, or ending subsidies for livestock production, which currently eats up an appalling 75 percent of the world's agricultural land.
Ethanol, or ethyl alcohol, is a type of biofuel produced
from organic matter
like corn, sugarcane, grasses, agricultural waste, and even garbage.
Another critic argues that the studies fail to consider no - till cultivation of biofuel crops, which actually increase soil carbon storage, and that
corn ethanol plants are converting to renewable energy, thus decreasing their emissions - meanwhile they are competing against fossil fuels
like oil
from tar sands that have an increased carbon footprint even compared to conventional gasoline.
One reason Obama feels
like he can shun the oil industry is that he comes
from a «
corn state» and has ties to the
ethanol industry.
(Note that the study did not look at first generation biofuels made
from tropical crops
like sugarcane or sweet sorghum which reduce emissions far more than
corn ethanol; for sugarcane
ethanol, the reduction is as large as that of cellulosic biofuels, earlier post.)
Ethanol production
from corn also creates byproducts,
like corn oil and gluten feed, which are valuable (albeit not fuel - related) commodities; considering all of these variables can eventually cancel the shortfall.
The report goes on to suggest,
like our commenter, that there is a slight reduction in greenhouse gas generation
from ethanol, but that the other environmental effects of intense
corn farming outweigh the gain.