Sentences with phrase «like free speech»

I like free speech, and they should voice their opinions, but they should also pay for their own security and clean - up costs.

You know those pesky constitutionally protected rights like free speech or the ability to petition your government for the redress of grievances.

Notably official rejection of the goal of liberal values like free speech, and strong mechanisms favoring the ruling party.

Thankfully we still have something like free speech.

Christians in America love the consti.tution and all the freedoms it affords them like FREE SPEECH, until there is an issue where it doesn't agree with their lifestyle and they protest it.

One is the risk that it might be forced to pay more attention to issues like free speech and censorship and journalistic integrity than it really wants to, which would be a huge hassle.

Not exact matches

These objectionable users are a result of Twitter's well - intentioned desire to allow total free speech and anonymity on the service, but they consistently drive out others, including influential users like actress Leslie Jones, who temporarily quit the service after a bombardment of racist tweets.

To block very hurtful comments that do not use hate speech (something like «why don't you step in front of a truck») could be perceived as limiting free speech.

Meanwhile, other big digital newcomers to the media scene, including BuzzFeed and Business Insider, have also been slow to take up the public interest banner long carried by the likes of the New York Times and the Press - Enterprise (a small California paper that, as Liptak explained, took two free speech cases all the way to the Supreme Court in the 1980s).

For all his talk about principles like openness and free speech, his leadership is better viewed as a balancing of constituencies, a reality familiar to any politician.

The tabloid is fighting for an important free speech principle and is pointing out, correctly, that celebrities like Hogan should not be able to use the media when it suits them and shut it down when it doesn't.

Everyone agrees what democracy ought to look like when it comes to picking governments: secret ballots, free speech and no dirty tricks.

I think what I'm getting at is this: Imagine 100 like - minded people (each with an obvious right to free speech) band together to speak on electoral politics.

Facebook doesn't like to decide what kind of rhetoric is appropriate or inappropriate for fear of encroaching on its users» free speech rights.

I don't think anyone would claim that specific groups can't have their own Facebook - like web site, but this particular site is perpetuating a gender segregation philosophy / ideology that many find abhorrent and readily use their free speech rights to argue against.

Critics argue the law suppresses free speech and makes South Korea like its northern counterpart, known for its human rights abuses and oppression of religious and political minorities.

Just like with Phil Robertson, matt has the right to free speech, but not freedom from consequences or people showing him the door

As you may be aware, many gays are atheists... I would hope that you support their free speech as much as you want them to support yours — otherwise it seems like your religiosity makes you seem... well... like the theists quoted.

It sounds to me like you are fine with atheists supporting discrimination against gays, just so long as gays don't have to support the free speech or other rights of atheists.

SisterChromatid - your missing my point I am not trying to trample anyone else s free speech, I just personally think it could have been said differently, what they said makes them appear like the self righteous ones and that helps no one, as someone who is spiritual and gay I have been judged by both Christians and atheists alike, one says I am going to hell the other says I'm a nutjob, when does it stop?

At the other end of the spectrum, one might treat phrases like «equal protection» and «free speech» as an invitation to judges to fashion whatever rules best serve the general values that the phrases suggest: equality, free expression, and so forth.

Along with advocating for better education in schools regarding reading the news, Cook says that companies like Apple have to do their part to walk the line between preventing fake news and censoring free speech.

Its first amendment was based on God of the bibles law that every man and woman were created equal... It gives us free will and freedom of speech... Without this nation being founded by the Christian principles this country would look like Syria in shambles and we would be in fear...

If its the comments upsetting you then, like it or not, this is what free speech is about.

Because of our legal system and free speech they can't get away with what they would like to see in place regarding women.

Nii, you are too stupid to understand that atheists do not want to persecute anyone — you are free to believe whatever you like - we fully support freedom of speech an religion.

The right to offend is what free speech looks like in practice, and the whole point about free speech is you don't pick who gets to enjoy it.

It's especially funny when they say they have the right to say something while those who hear that something do not have a right to respond unless the response is something the «free speech» sloganeers like.

«I think that [ban] would be a severe curtailment of free speech as something more... like Soviet Russia.

Failing to protect free - speech we will find the government becoming like the the Indian government who charge Aseem Trivedi, a political cartoonist, with sedition because... they didn't like the message.

Spelled out in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «Evangelicals in the Social Struggle,» as well as in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a) society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care, ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «freedom rights,» e. g., the rights to public property, free speech, and so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the present editorial position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished from its counterpart by the time period involved (it pushed others like Moody Monthly into a more active involvement in the social arena), by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility, by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and by its willingness to offer structural critique on the American political system.

If you start picking and choosing and labeling speech you don't like as hateful, it's not free anymore.

Those, (and it's only some of them) «religious» people who are saying their freedom of speech is being violated are perfectly free to express that anywhere they like, but not in this sort of «captive» audience situation.

Moulana Yousaf Qureshi — I will offer the same amount to anyone who will behead YOU for the same offense to Asia Bibi — if you have her killed, we would also like to see you killed because of offense to humanity — the same humanity that speaks for free speech, free chhoice of religion, free choice of politics, etc..

The fact is... it has nothing to do with free speech... you simply just don't like his opinion.

When we face economic restraint on free speech, something like antitrust laws in communication are necessary.

keith thanks for your service... but I guess you don't know what free speech actually is, seems like only a person expressing one view is ok.

As for your point on free speech... I guess instead of having any rules we should abolish any and all rules... sounds like that is what you want anyway.

You can say that you don't like the way Tom Tom makes points and say that she lacks integrity, but to throw Jen into there because she's defending Tom Tom's free speech is a stupid, and illogical position.

You said:» As for your point on free speech... I guess instead of having any rules we should abolish any and all rules... sounds like that is what you want anyway.

These Chinese spies also logon to various English news cites pretending to a ordinary news readers and then try to mislead people on issues like Tibet, Uyghur people, Tiananmen Square, free speech in China.

It's free speech, like it or not.

We should all be grateful to live in a country where free speech is protected — whether it's Dan Cathy's comments on gay marriage or a protestor's homemade sign — and we must be wary of victimizing ourselves over something like this lest we render the word «persecution» meaningless.

The receptionist in the abortion clinic, with coarse speech and glazed eyes, offers Juno a free condom: berry - flavored, like pie, we're told ¯ and even the worldly-wise teenager grimaces in disgust.

HappyMeal The right of a woman to control her own reproductive life is like the right to free speech: You don't have to agree with how people exercise that right to still want to protect their right to do it.

And this man wants to curb the free speech of those who say things he does not like, rather than curb speech that is not protected speech.

«Not only are such laws detrimental to free speech here in Europe, but they also enable countries like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Iran to justify their own laws, which in the case of 13 states come with a death sentence.»

It sorta like if I went into a hospital and cussed at a patient and then claimed free speech as I got fired.

He told me: «You are acting like a dictator trying to restrict free speech.

You are acting like a dictator trying to restrict free speech.