They aren't trying to persuade, they are,
like global warming argument - recyclers, trying to discourage.
Not exact matches
If there were still serious
arguments and reputable scientists that challenge anthropogenic
global warming, surely film - makers
like Durkin would have found and presented them?
In fact, I was by default not doubting the
global warming classic interpretation till I started reading multiple sources on the net, and as my self - confession as a recent skeptic shows, the
argument from the denialist camp are not only convincing to petrol gulping rednecks, but also to a very scientifically minded, atheist european (although, I must admit, I
like motor sports; — RRB --RRB-.
With or without
global warming, there's a solid
argument that improved understanding of planetary dynamics, particularly the climate system, is essential to sustaining human progress given how risks rise as populations expand, build, farm and concentrate in zones that are implicitly vulnerable to hard knocks
like floods, droughts, heat and severe storms.
Long - time greens are painfully aware that the
arguments of
global warming skeptics are
like zombies in a»70s B movie.
Big Oil and Big Coal funded sympathetic think tanks
like the Heritage Foundation and the Competitive Enterprise Institute and also outright front groups with names
like Friends of Science and the
Global Climate Coalition, all of which came up with an endless stream of arguments for why global warming wasn't happening and even if it was, nothing should be done abo
Global Climate Coalition, all of which came up with an endless stream of
arguments for why
global warming wasn't happening and even if it was, nothing should be done abo
global warming wasn't happening and even if it was, nothing should be done about it.
there is indeed limited
argument regarding recent
warming as long as the discussion is based on «official»
global data bases; as soon as you consider a) all «comments» on data quality and significance, temperature data as included in GHCN, Crutem, Giss are heavily contested by experts from more than 15 countries, including «smaller» countries
like he US, Canada, the entire Northern Europe, Russia....
A favorite
argument among climate scientist «skeptics»
like Christy, Spencer, and Lindzen is that «internal variability» can account for much or all of the
global warming we've observed over the past century.
«To support their
argument, advocates of manmade
global warming have intermingled elements of greenhouse activity and infrared absorption to promote the image that carbon dioxide traps heat near earth's surface
like molecular greenhouses insulating our atmosphere.
If there were still serious
arguments and reputable scientists that challenge anthropogenic
global warming, surely film - makers
like Durkin would have found and presented them?
YouTube and blogs have been used to foment falsehoods or distort
arguments around issues
like global warming.