Note that while the BEST approach is based on correlations, they are correlations of variables with known causal relationships (i.e. an increased greenhouse effect is known to cause global warming), although they do not appear to have considered some important influences
like human aerosol emissions or the El Niño Southern Oscillation.
Not exact matches
Somewhere there should also be a cost in
human health bill for coal and gas — related to other aspects of fossil fuel epidemiology —
like poisoning from mercury from coal
emissions or asthma from
aerosols from gas plants.
In other words, the slowed surface warming isn't a result of a smaller global energy imbalance due to factors
like increased cooling from
human aerosol emissions.
The failure to actually reduce global
emissions has meant that all possibilities are now on the table, including some that sound
like premises from a science - fiction novel:
Humans could sequester carbon dioxide by removing it from the air through technologies that mimic trees, or we could spray water droplets in the lower atmosphere to reflect light and heat back to space, or we could seed sulfur
aerosols in the stratosphere to do the same.