Sentences with phrase «like human language»

And because you can't process all the data you have to start to rely on probabilistic techniques... statistics, analytics... You have to start developing systems that can understand things like human language... define the meaning of words, the meaning of information as it's stored on disc.

Its repetitive taunt will no doubt start to sound like human language to you before long.

A Catholic principle becomes ever clearer at this time, and Pius XII expressed it in these words: «Just as the substantial Word of God became like men in every respect except sin, so too the words of God, expressed in human languages, became like human language in every respect except error.»

In this respect Enns, an evangelical, is close to Catholic theology, expressed by Pius XII in Divino Afflante Spiritu: «Just as the substantial Word of God became like men in every respect except sin, so too the words of God, expressed in human languages, became like human language in every respect except error.»

Not exact matches

Companies like Apple (aapl) and Google (goog) have built mobile phone powered digital assistants like Siri and Google's Assistant that use A.I. techniques like deep learning and natural language processing to recognize the human voice and answer people's questions on the fly.

If a Martian landed from outer space and spoke a language that violated universal grammar, we simply would not be able to learn that language the way that we learn a human language like English or Swahili... We're designed by nature for English, Chinese, and every other possible human language.

just like children learn to make pictures before they learn how to correctly make written language so did early humans.

And how do you even defend yourself against such a barrage when someone thinks it's their human right to foul the air with any kind of language they «damn well» please, anytime they feel like it?

If you believe that Christian doctrine is essentially an attempt to capture dimensions of human experience that defy precise expression in language because of personal and cultural limitations, then the truth about God, the human condition, salvation, and the like can never be adequately posited once and for all; on the contrary, the church must express ever and anew its experience of the divine as mediated through Jesus Christ.

When I reflect on the infinite pains to which the human mind and heart will go in order to protect itself from the full impact of reality, when I recall the mordant analyses of religious belief which stem from the works of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud and, furthermore, recognize the truth of so much of what these critics of religion have had to say, when I engage in a philosophical critique of the language of theology and am constrained to admit that it is a continual attempt to say what can not properly be said and am thereby led to wonder whether its claim to cognition can possibly be valid — when I ask these questions of myself and others like them (as I can not help asking and, what is more, feel obliged to ask), is not the conclusion forced upon me that my faith is a delusion?

Our calling is to invite all to turn from gods which are even less than human, and from idols like power, profit, property, creed, class, caste, language, race, success, technocratic progress, managerial efficiency and the ego, and thus experience the fulfilling realization of God's Reign which consists in justice, freedom and fellowship, tender love, universal compassion and equitable sharing of resources.

While classification freed directors to use explicit language in marvelous films like Platoon and Something Wild and has allowed films like Out of Africa and Children of a Lesser God to explore the complex nature of human sexuality, it has also given us a series of slasher films — Friday the 13th, with its many parts; The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, parts one and two — and films like Brian DePalma's artistically significant but deplorably explicit Body Double.

In Genesis 1 we do not see directly the creation of human language by God, but «we see something like the circulation of an underground river, before its appearance as a spring above ground.

If we have something to say about the timeless enemies of the human condition — injustice, ignorance, bigotry, exploitation, hunger, war — we will fail if we try to sound like every other voice in the public realm instead of using our language and tradition.

However, being an atheist I do not believe in god and can not see why people want to take serious a fairy tale written and misinterpreted so, many ways like it was passed down through word of mouth and was not translated until 400 years after the original language became extinct never mind that regards of the accuracy it was still written by a human.

Like Judge Benningfield's defense, claiming his ruling will lead to fewer «burdens» such as children, the eugenics movement was also cloaked in promising language, defined as an effort to «improve» the human race.

It was a bit like demanding that Jesus be fully human without getting thirsty, or without sleeping, or without assuming a language and ethnicity and gender.

Like how we humans have developed languages onto ourselves..

There is a close parallel in the interaction of metaphorical language and literal language; there is no sharp line between the two, but only a distinction which is relative, shifting, and contextdependent.31 «Man is a wolf» invites reflection not only on wolf - life characteristics of man, but also on man - like characteristics of the wolf, which is seen thereafter as more human.

We differentiated between computational approaches (either based on volume data, such as the number of mentions related to a party or candidate or the occurrence of particular hashtags; or endorsement data, such as the number of Twitter followers, Facebook friends or the number of «likes» received on Facebook walls), sentiment analysis approaches, that pay attention to the language and try to attach a qualitative meaning to the comments (posts, tweets) published by social media users employing automated tools for sentiment analysis (i.e., via natural language processing models or the employment of pre-defined ontological dictionaries), and finally what we call supervised and aggregated sentiment analysis (SASA), that is, techniques that exploit the human codification in their process and focus on the estimation of the aggregated distribution of the opinions, rather than on individual classification of each single text (Ceron et al. 2016).

Citizen Action has offered «diversity training» programs for elected officials and those connected to local politics like the decommissioned Human Rights Commission (HRC) using the same language and goals.

But this time, it's the most comprehensive guide to the human cortex — the brain's outermost layer, responsible for things like complex thought, creativity and language.

Using what we know about human genes, for example, could help us extrapolate details like Neanderthal hair and eye color, their genetic diseases, and possibly even their language capabilities.

The genetic record is «like a lost library... and we're just starting to learn the language of all those books that we have uncovered,» says Johannes Krause, director of archaeogenetics at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany.

Babies are born with the ability to learn and use language, a feature of human behavior that, like other behavioral capabilities, emerged from eons of biological evolution — a scientific explanation that author Tom Wolfe rejects in his new book, The Kingdom of Speech.

Back in the early 1950s, when I was a graduate student at Harvard, the general assumption was that language, like all other human activities, is just a collection of learned behaviors developed through the same methods used to train animals — by reinforcement.

Those ideas crystallized and became part of the so - called biolinguistic framework, which looks at language as an element of human biology, rather like, say, the visual system.

Whenever you see something interesting, like the evolution of multicellular creatures or human language, cooperation is involved.»

Humans, like many animals, use body language to distinguish friend from foe.

What we would like to learn by studying language is how the human brain learns something that is that complicated without any direct evidence.

«Every time a researcher finds that tool use or theory of mind or language - like communication is not unique to humans, somebody comes up with new categories that raise the bar.»

That shows that they are the natural product of the human brain, just like spoken languages.

Without access to the human voice and body language, this can all get a bit cagey in my experience, and it can certainly open you eyes to how much science — like any other profession — is all about personalities.

The second point is to draw on an analogy with language and ask whether there might be something like a universal moral grammar, a set of principles that every human is born with.

They can also inform efforts to design natural language processing systems like Siri to help them understand creativity in human language.

And just like humans, it appears not all plants speak the same language.

What critics like English linguist Geoffrey Sampson, author of Educating Eve: The «Language Instinct» Debate, seem to find most irksome is Pinker's wholehearted promotion of a linguistic model that views the human capacity for learning language as distinct from other abilities, such as building bridges or writing symphonies.

For humans to be able to extract meaningful information from the troves of data being collected by the «smart» machines with which we interact — such as mobile phones — computers need to be able process language like humans.

Nevertheless, the need for historical language comparison is still vital: «In large parts of the world, like in New Guinea or South America, both the languages and the history of the human populations speaking them still remain crudely understudied,» says List.

Deep learning has brought about machines that can «see» the world more like humans can, and recognize language.

Scientists have debated whether the various grunts refer to specific foods, which would make the calls something like words in a human language.

«The goal of this work is to try to get the machine to learn language more like the way humans do,» says Jim Glass, a senior research scientist at CSAIL and a co-author on the paper describing the new system.

Like language, religion and music, stories are found in all cultures: they are part of what makes us human.

«But genes tied to autism tend to affect specific functions, such as the connections between brain regions that are essential to many human - specific behaviors, like speech and language.»

Since language has likely been around for at least 2 million years, there is little doubt that other human - like species, such as Neanderthals, did a lot of talking.

The fossils of the creature, named after the Rising Star cave system in which they were discovered — «naledi» means «star» in the local Sesotho language — paint the picture of an ancient hominin that possessed a mixture of human and ape - like traits.

Most striking is the ability of human babies to selectively attend to language, spontaneously babble in syllables and quickly pick up the grammar of the surrounding language to produce novel sentences like «We holded the baby rabbits» and «Hey, Horton heared a Who.»

Songbirds are another popular tool for language studies because, just like humans, they learn to communicate with their voices.

No matter who you are, what you look like, where you come from, who you choose to love, the language you choose to speak, we all have value and worth as human beings.

The soundtrack is a frenzied soundscape of stringed instruments, and we eventually hear Scarlett Johansson forming sounds and reading alphabetical lists of words, like someone learning a language, and those circles become what appears to be a human eye.