Not exact matches
We don't need to use a cocktail of small molecules,
growth factors or other supplements to create a
population of bone cells from
human pluripotent stem cells
like induced pluripotent stem cells,» Varghese said.
They found that
human needs, such as employment, utility consumption and housing, correspond directly with the
population: As the number of people doubles so does the need for housing, jobs and electricity infrastructure, which encompasses the number of roads, gasoline stations and the
like already in place and does not necessarily keep pace with individual
growth — the ratio of user to facility simply rises.
Fortunately,
population growth in the world appears to be slowing faster than anyone forecasted, largely through voluntarily measures (with the exception of a few states
like China), while simultaneously improving
human welfare around the world.
This cultural shift must also include the recognition, as the present study makes clear, that the problem of
human population growth can be feasibly addressed only if it is recognized that increases in the
population of the
human species,
like increases in the
population of all other species, is a function of increases in food availability.»
As the
human population heads toward 9 billion, more or less, with most of the
growth coming in struggling places, unless more is done to boost resilience to known hazards — earthquakes included — there will be ever more wrenching imagery
like that out of China (and Myanmar, as well).
Evidently, concerns
like long - term
human wellbeing, biodiversity preservation and the integrity of Earth's body are momentarily at odds with powerful economic and political forces which relentlessly and unrealistically maintain an economic system marked by unrestricted and increasing per capita consumption, unbridled and expanding economic globalization, and continuous and rapid
growth of the
human population.
But I personally think such a future would diminish us all, so I would
like to see more people listen to Steve Salmony, Jack Alpert, and other voices in favor of slowing
human population growth now in a humane way.
I would
like to challenge several professional contributors, not the laymen of these pages, on suggesting over
population of the
human being, or
population growth, as never being addressed as an alternative to energy conservation: So many of us DO speak of our concerns and prioritization of the «too many
human beings» on this planet.
You and you alone can «re-center» our national debate on issues
like the unsustainability of increasing conspicuous per -
human over-consumption of limited resources; the unsustainability of skyrocketing absolute global
human population numbers; and the soon to become patently unsustainable, seemingly endless
growth of large - scale industrial / corporate activities, now threatening to engulf the surface of the planetary home God has blessed us to inhabit and, I suppose, not to overwhelm.
Human population,
like many, is a function of exponential
growth.
I'd also
like to add that as a tree - hugger myself I think it is a desperate shame that CAGW has displaced saner environmental problems that we could be dealing with namely around pollution, biodiversity loss, loss of habitats and everything else brought on by
human population growth
Fortunately,
population growth in the world appears to be slowing faster than anyone forecasted, largely through voluntarily measures (with the exception of a few states
like China), while simultaneously improving
human welfare around the world.
And
human population growth and economic expansion continue to demand new resources
like energy and food, to claim new land and to cut natural landscapes into disconnected patchworks.