Once you get a better understanding of what a potential college student should look
like in your school of choice, put yourself in the shoes of a professor.
Not exact matches
Keep
in mind that some
choices,
like changing
schools and majors, taking longer than prescribed to complete your program, or studying abroad, could increase your costs
of school.
Less freedom
of food
choice in our public
schools or places
like NYC.
Those famous soft thick bakery sugar cookies with frosting (seem more
like discs
of cake though), the soft chewy ones you make at home to decorate for various holidays, or those not soft, sad, no flavor, gross kind
of sugar cookies that kids would bring
in on there birthdays
in elementary
school since their mom thought it was a «healthier»
choice than cupcakes.
And even though I'd
like to think I'd make a different
choice in the situation when my kids are high
school age, now that I do have children
of my own I'm a lot more sympathetic to my dad.
We recently sat down with Kern Halls, Area Manager
of Orange County Public
School Food & Nutrition Services, to discuss ways the OCPS district has engaged students in their food choices through creative initiatives like My Food Face — a sort of «internal Facebook» for students and their families — and the use of a food truck for school events and field
School Food & Nutrition Services, to discuss ways the OCPS district has engaged students
in their food
choices through creative initiatives
like My Food Face — a sort
of «internal Facebook» for students and their families — and the use
of a food truck for
school events and field
school events and field trips.
Children who
like or benefit from a lot
of structure may struggle to learn
in a Montessori or Waldorf
school, as both
of those philosophies place emphasis on child
choice rather than rigid classroom structures.
It then distributes it to a child
in need through a non-profit organization
of the buyer's
choice — everything from local
schools to national and global organizations
like Baby2Baby, Volunteers
of America's Operation Backpack, and the Salvation Army.
«Being «out»
in the workplace is a matter
of personal
choice, but too many LGBTI teachers tell us they would
like to be out but do not feel their
school is a safe environment for them to do so.
Firstly, to prevent a person from making a
choice to wear religious clothing (
like the hijab)
in public or private
schools or institutions,
in the absence
of justification compatible with human rights law, may impair the individual's freedom to have or adopt a religion.
Most Council members had two unstated reasons for supporting Greenfield
in using tax money to fund religious
schools: they either have constituents who would
like their
choice to send their children to these
schools to be further subsidized or they want to buy themselves good will with the increasingly powerful and cohesive blocs
of Orthodox, fundamentalist, and Catholic voters should they decide to seek higher office.
Meaning, firearms
like the very popular AR - 15, which has increasingly become a weapon
of choice among many mass shooters, including the individual who murdered seventeen people
in the shooting last month at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High
School.
In a series
of experiments with middle
school and high
school students, Blikstein is trying to understand the best ways to teach math and science by going beyond relatively primitive tools
like multiple -
choice tests to assess students» knowledge.
Coconut oil is especially beneficial with its high content
of lauric acid, which is both anti-viral and anti - bacterial.7 Since the children are constantly exposed to illnesses
in school, coconut oil seems
like a good
choice.
Sometimes it seems
like oxfords are the perfect shoe — wearable
in all seasons with anything from cuffed trousers to a sundress — and that's probably why they've been the footwear
of choice for prep
school students for decades.
In the past few years, new statewide voucher programs in Indiana, Louisiana, and Ohio and the steady growth of a tax - credit funded scholarship program in Florida have offered a glimpse of what expansive private - school choice might look lik
In the past few years, new statewide voucher programs
in Indiana, Louisiana, and Ohio and the steady growth of a tax - credit funded scholarship program in Florida have offered a glimpse of what expansive private - school choice might look lik
in Indiana, Louisiana, and Ohio and the steady growth
of a tax - credit funded scholarship program
in Florida have offered a glimpse of what expansive private - school choice might look lik
in Florida have offered a glimpse
of what expansive private -
school choice might look
like.
It feels
like almost everything
of note gets lost
in debates about whether «
school choice works» and amidst hoary claims
of «privatization.»
When
school closures are embedded
in a strategy to create better
school choices for children, it feels
like less
of an attack.
There's lots
of choice in school systems
like Charlotte - Mecklenberg and Seattle.
To many
in the media, both studies sound
like they are estimating the effectiveness
of charter
schools or maybe even the impact
of school choice — so shouldn't the answer be the same?
Also
in these ranks: leaders
like former Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick (Milton Academy and Harvard), former Tennessee congressman Harold Ford, Jr. (St. Albans and UPenn) and,
of course, U.S. Senator Cory Booker, the lone public
school graduate among these (Northern Valley Regional
in affluent Bergen County and Stanford), who has also been the most vocal supporter
of school choice.
Mike Petrilli and Rick Kahlenberg are among my favorite people (I don't know Sam Chaltain, although I might
like him, too), but their piece
in Sunday's Washington Post smacks
of nanny - statism rather than
school choice and educational effectiveness.
That's the crucial role
of mundane considerations
like authorizing, quality control, and market dynamics
in assessing the likely benefits
of school choice.
Critics
of ESAs and other
school choice efforts
like to allege that the programs will «siphon» resources from public
schools or harm students
in some way.
We need to learn from the contagious successes
of outstanding public
schools and
choice programs
like the Amistad Academy
in Connecticut, the Green Dot
schools in California, and the voluntary interdistrict transfer program
in St. Louis.
Whether it is the role
of money
in politics and the so - called «donor class,» the emergence
of Republican majorities
in formerly blue states
like her native Michigan, or the still - rocky relationship between accountability and
school choice, DeVos has become a convenient proxy for these larger issues.
What they all have
in common is an enrollment process open to all students
in the district, usually by lottery, to ensure that
schools like Bravo don't cream the crop (though it is true that, by dint
of applying, students and their families may indicate a higher motivation and sophistication about making educational
choices).
The chart above also makes it clear that some families
in Cleveland still choose low - performing
schools, probably for reasons the Plan hasn't yet or can't address: a lack
of transportation to better options or the pull
of neighborhood history that can make a low - performing
school seem
like a good
choice.
When they insist that ideas
like school choice, performance pay, and teacher evaluations based on value - added measures will themselves boost student achievement, would - be reformers stifle creativity, encourage their allies to lock elbows and march forward rather than engage
in useful debate and reflection, turn every reform proposal into an us - against - them steel - cage match, and push researchers into the awkward position
of studying whether reforms «work» rather than when, why, and how they make it easier to improve
schooling.
Expanding
school choice,
like almost all
of education reform, occurs
in the states, so who is
in charge
in DC will not make too much
of a difference other than turning a headwind into a tailwind.
It will please all others who fear competition
in education, who don't
like the idea
of parental
choice in schools, or who harbor antagonism toward religious
schools.
Since Donald Trump's election and Betsy DeVos's selection as Secretary
of Education put private -
school -
choice programs
in the national spotlight — after years
of slow - and - steady growth at the state level — advocates across Twitter and the blogosphere have been offering ideas on what a big push at the federal level might look
like.
Or consider private
school choice mechanisms
like voucher and tax credit scholarship programs: Despite the positive impacts
of these programs, only eleven
of our thirty cities are located
in states where they are legal.
In this context, is it any wonder that organizations
like the Black Alliance for Educational Options, and urban legislators
like Wisconsin's Polly Williams, have promoted
school choice as an avenue for escaping the «savage inequalities»
of inner - city
schools?
That said, for reasons I discussed last week
in terms
of merit pay, I'm skeptical that research can «settle» arguments regarding complex organizational reforms
like school choice.
I want every child to have quality
school choices, I want stronger (and broader) external standards, I want more open paths to becoming an educator, I want empowered
school leaders (really empowered,
in ways that would also break the union stranglehold) who are compensated
like CEOs, I want super pay for great instructors and no pay for incompetents, and I want a complete makeover
of «local control.»
«Being «out»
in the workplace is a matter
of personal
choice, but too many LGBTI teachers tell us they would
like to be out but do not feel their
school is a safe environment for them to do so.
According to the survey, parent opinion reads
like a photocopy
of the union's agenda — supportive
of more investment
in schools and teachers, wary
of standardized testing, skeptical about evaluating teachers based on student performance, and resistant to the expansion
of choice.
They are able to focus on abstract goals —
like test scores, teacher quality, or
school choice —
in debates divorced from the challenges
of making reforms actually work
in situ.
If entrepreneurs can be «too nice»
in a public forum, self - styled reformers can be too vague — choosing to bang familiar drums
like «teacher unions,» «
school choice,» «accountability,» or «incentives» rather than talking clearly and concretely about the mechanics
of reinventing K — 12 education.
Potter, who
like many education reformers supports public
school choice in the form
of charter
schools but opposes vouchers, argues Nevada's private
schools will be exempt from requirements to teach the more challenging students, including those with disabilities or those from poor families.
In one sense, the upshot
of charter laws has been much
like that
of private -
school choice programs: They gave families more K - 12 options from which to choose.
«It is absurd that Connecticut's current funding system severely underfunds urban
schools and keeps high performing
schools of choice,
like the one my children attend,
in a separate and unequal system,» she said.
The notion
of portable funding to expand
school choice has been backed by conservatives
like former Republican nominee Mitt Romney, who made it a big part
of his education platform
in 2012.
I
like that DeVos hasn't spent her life
in education bureaucracies, is an outspoken champion
of all kinds
of educational
choice, strikes those who've driven Obama - era
school reform as an «outsider,» and is a small government conservative.
In her Senate confirmation hearing, DeVos did not say that she would seek to add a mandatory school choice voucher - like program into the Every Student Succeeds Act, but did tell senators,» I would hope I could convince you of the merits of that, maybe in some future legislation, but certainly not in a mandate from the department.&raqu
In her Senate confirmation hearing, DeVos did not say that she would seek to add a mandatory
school choice voucher -
like program into the Every Student Succeeds Act, but did tell senators,» I would hope I could convince you
of the merits
of that, maybe
in some future legislation, but certainly not in a mandate from the department.&raqu
in some future legislation, but certainly not
in a mandate from the department.&raqu
in a mandate from the department.»
I see real value
in having Washington make it easier for states and communities to more readily expand options if they'd
like, but that calls for a clear - headed discussion
of Washington's role — not reflexive cheerleading for
school choice.
The question we should all be asking
of DeVos and Trump's education team is not whether they
like school choice in the abstract, but what they intend to do
in Washington.
And the president's proposal to allow $ 1 billion
in federal funds to follow poor children to the public
schools of their
choice — while thin on details — sounds a lot
like a proposal that failed to pass the GOP - led Senate
in 2015.
Join the movement · Serve on the NBFA board
of directors · Advocate for NBFA and other quality
schools of choice · Become a force
in Connecticut's education reform movement For more information, please contact the Development Office at 203-610-6267 Follow us on Twitter: @NBFACADEMY
Like us on Facebook: NBFAcademy