Impeachment is a use of something
like judicial power by the legislative branch.
Not exact matches
Or since it is a political affair that must be somewhat
like a
judicial proceeding, we might think of it as a mix of legislative and
judicial power, but one only exercised by the legislative branch.
Related: Why has the Supreme Court of the United States not used its
power of
judicial review to audit constitutionally - questionable laws
like the Patriot Act?
He argues that «under any conception of our separation of
powers, I would have thought powerful and centralized authorities
like today's administrative agencies would have warranted less deference from other branches, not more,» and that
judicial deference has «added prodigious new
powers to an already titanic administrative state.»
Like the heated question of whether a non-entrenchment clause could be dug into our law to protect UK parliamentary sovereignty, this one wasn't about law, or even constitutional theory; it was essentially about differing ideological positions vis a vis
judicial power.
References to literature in
judicial opinions,
like metaphors and similes, derive their
power from surprise; therefore, if used frequently, they lose their novelty,
like the oft - repeated punch line of an outdated joke.
A libel case,
like all lawsuits, involves the government's
judicial branch using its coercive
power to make you pay money as a result of your speech, based on a law requiring you to pay money for certain kinds of speech.
Likewise, the Polish Sejm's giving itself the
power to select members of the national
judicial council (i.e., the body responsible for nominating Polish judges) might not be a cause of concern, because those judges will still enjoy some protections from the majority party
like civil service tenure.
One example of a lack of the same, i.e.,
judicial arrogation of divine -
like power over mortality — and talk about from the sublime to the ridiculous — is this report from Paul Levy of Public Citizen's Consumer Law & Policy Blog about a favorite topic of mine, too: the reduction of trademark law to the role of handmaiden to Big College Pro Football's money grab over, well, everything: