Sentences with phrase «like less government»

Not exact matches

Investigators believed the company's reviews over whether to supply customers more controlled substances were not meaningful and were used as a sales tool; customers were granted threshold increases for reasons, like the 4th of July, or the closure of an area pharmacy years earlier, that the government considered less than compelling.

While he would have liked to have seen more investor - specific changes — «it's always nice to have more rather than less,» he says — he thinks it's unlikely we'll see any reductions in capital gain taxes or major increases in TFSA room until at least 2015, when the government says it can balance the budget by.

Second, while it makes sense that an environment in which investments, like government debt, are yielding a smaller return might cause people to spend less today in order to make their retirement goals, there just isn't a lot of evidence that this happens in the real world.

It presented two findings: First, the German public didn't like the reforms passed by Merkel's government in its first year; second, when the public was presented with arguments and data justifying the reforms, it liked them even less.

Less than 10 % of LGBT - owned businesses currently work as contractors for state and local government, according to NGLCC research, although 80 % say they would like that opportunity.

«It is also clear that the government has made the considered decision that it is better off securing such crypto - legislative authority from the courts [than] taking the chance that open legislative debate might produce a result less to its liking.»

It comes as no surprise that governments don't like Bitcoin and banks and financial institutions like it even less.

The secure messaging service — under pressure from authoritarian governments like Russia and Iran — has reportedly scrapped the token sale after raising $ 1.7 billion from less than 200 private investors.

Like the Anti-Federalists of yesterday, today's Republicans generally favor less government, less centralized control over the economy, less regulation and control over the private sector, less spending, and lower taxes.

Some companies — like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase, which face less competition now and have been helped by the government's attempts to prop up credit markets — will still hand out enormous paychecks.

While there is a remarkable resemblance, it really should be a question of whether Obama acts like Satan... he certainly seems to want the destruction of Israel... reduction in religious freedom... less individual freedom... more government control...

True Friend, I as an atheist and human being like you, would not want (and do not want to see) a system of government, culture, society, religion, or authority where if I were to wave a careless hand with unthinking anger, the deaths of anyone would be encompassed, much less the deaths of billions of human beings of any belief?

Do you really think that we can sustain a government with less than half the people in this country paying taxes, oh let me guess the liberal media didn't mention we can turn out like Greece so it will never happen to us!

Like all parallel medical services, it falls to the patient to figure out who is legitimately skilled and who is not: EXCEPT, most women having babies are in their twenties and early thirties and I personally didn't have the kind of life - experience necessary to question whether or not my government would provide me with sub par care and just assumed that if the government was paying, it must be safe, and the midwifery community capitalizes on this by running advertisements (which OB / GYN are not permitted to do) advertising themselves as being less interventionist, less c - section (no shit, Sherlock, but you'd have to read between the lines to understand why), and better outcomes.

You can see how this is a lose / lose situation — hungry students have a harder time learning, and when kids skip meals which would be paid for by the federal government, the cafeteria brings in less money to help offset its fixed expenses like labor and overhead.

Wahhabi government of Saudis (More or less like ISIL) consider Iranian Shia people as polytheist (see here).

Surely some of New Labour's right - wing excesses reflect an attitude that Labour can more or less do what it likes in government without alienating too much of its core progressive constituency as this constituency has nowhere else to go.

I had foolishly assumed that whether I liked them or not, people in government were there because they knew how to do their job but the last 12 months alone have included the decision to hold a snap election that then lost them more seats than a bad IKEA intern, Brexit talks that have mimicked that track Paula Abdul did with a cartoon cat, an offensive defence secretary, an international development secretary who had to resign in order to spend less time on holiday, Boris Johnson sadly continuing to be Boris Johnson and all of that and more culminating in an assurance that everything is fine because now our passports will be blue to match the depression everyone will have in 2018.

At Silver's trial jurors were told they could convict based on «any action under color of official authority» by Silver, but the 2d Circuit said the Supreme Court ruling required a «formal exercise of government power,» rather than lesser acts like just making a phone call or having a meeting.

This is like because the security fence around the West Bank has lead to a dramatic reduction in terrorist attacks, meaning that the government is less likely to view the establishment of a Palestinian state as immediately necessarily to Israeli security interests.

«The ECHR can bind the hands of parliament, adds nothing to our prosperity, makes us less secure by preventing the deportation of dangerous foreign nationals — and does nothing to change the attitudes of governments like Russia's when it comes to human rights,»

So we're delighted that Labour have given us the opportunity to talk about this government's record in Wales: 90,000 new private sector jobs, 26,000 more small buinesses, falling unemployment, 47,000 less workless households, the NATO Summit and huge infrastructure investment like the electrification of the South Wales and Valleys lines.

Mr Brookes argued that the UK's teaching workforce were likely a «neglected army» and called on the government to make the inspection system «less like a sword of Damocles».

Ambode said that «Governors are the owners of the land in their states but underneath the land and even inside the water, the Federal Government is structured in a way that it controls those potentials adding that In a situation where the states are being spoon - fed, because I call the federation account more or less like spoon - feeding.

The solution is we need qualified and trust worthy leaders, so less lawyers and more engineers and doctors, but at the same time people have to realize no one can run, or has a track record of successively running a gigantic behemoths, like our government.

«The ECHR can bind the hands of parliament, adds nothing to our prosperity, makes us less secure by preventing the deportation of dangerous foreign nationals and does nothing to change the attitudes of governments like Russia's when it comes to human rights.

So presumably, the less wealthy, after being told what to spend their money on by «society» for all their working years, reach pensionable age fully moulded by a paternalistic government into financially responsible citizens who will commit a significant amount of their time to research where they want to invest their pensions, and subsequently enjoy «regular updates on how their pension fund was growing» — because of course, like house prices, pension funds can only rise in value.

I'm a Brooklynite; I believe the city government during the Bloomberg years became less and less fair to the outer boroughs... I think I've made clear what it looks like to have a five - borough government that respects every borough.»

As I write, Radio 4's Eddie Mair is trying to get Danny Alexander to explain why the coalition has published a document that contains less detail about the government's future plans on issues like childcare than you'll find in the papers.

«What I'd like to see is less emphasis on fighting the federal government in whatever form and more emphasis on restoring the brain trust in Westchester County to make sure that we can provide resources to municipalities so that they can do smart planning for the future,» says Borgia.

The Tories were hubristic and ambitious, like Hillary Clinton who chased a blow out win, which made even less sense in a presidential system than it did in a parliamentary system where governments are stronger with larger majorities.

Critics say the candidates» dependence on outside money makes residents of the Syracuse area congressional district feel like they have less influence and fuels cynicism about government.

Reform is unashamedly free market and small government and has found the Cameron regime less to its liking than its predecessors.

The process of knocking on the doors of industry is very different from approaching government sources like NSERC and may in fact be less stressful and more direct.

There is a looming fear among government leaders and non-quinoa farmers that other more stable agricultural commodities, like wheat and potatoes, will be abandoned by farmers because they are perceived as less profitable.

If it was «Sarah Palin» saying something like these are all the rage in government these days or «Michelle Obama» saying I love sleeveless dresses, I think it would be a lesser issue.

Synopsis: Jim McAllister (Matthew Broderick), a well - liked high school government teacher, can't help but notice that successful student Tracy Flick (Reese Witherspoon) uses less than ethical tactics to get what she wants.

The consensus appears to be that these higher levels of performance have less to do with policy than with everything else: the «ecosystem» of reform in a given place (usually a city) and its network of «human - capital providers,» expert charter - management organizations, leadership - development programs, school - incubator efforts, local funders and civic leaders, etc. — in other words, what conservatives like to call «civil society»: the space between the government and the individual (in this case, between government and individual schools).

The Welsh government has placed a greater emphasis on rigour and there is now an expectation that more pupils will be disappointed in future so situations like this may become less unusual.

I think of it less as a «market» (Central Government is too involved for it to be one) but like a football manager model.

«It would be great if all the politically energized public school supporters turn their attention to things that are less visible but higher impact — like how the federal government will permit states to implement accountability under the new ESSA law.

This new model sounds less like egalitarianism and more like the Bush administration, intent on outsourcing government jobs to private contractors.

It almost seems like the government wants to reward us for taking the risk of investing in stocks by getting us to pay less taxes when we do!

The final question that will be discussed in this analysis read like - so: «Do you think the government should enact more or less regulation on the payday loan industry?»

Emerging Market government bonds (If you want risk, stick to the less popular ones, like Venezuela, Argentina, Lebanon, Turkey, or just invest in a broad index ETF like EMB)

Like those in Europe and the U.S., Canadians will simply need to get used to the idea of getting a little less help from the government while paying more in taxes.

GM wants the bond holders to take less than they likely would if the company went bankrupt and the government is looming with a silent threat that the bond holders might not get treated like they would in a normal bankruptcy.

• If your mortgage is purchased by one of the government - sponsored companies, like Fannie Mae, you will likely end up paying less in fees for a 15 - year loan.

As for government claw back rules, I could care less cause after what I been through in my college years (not to say anything about my childhood years that were in many respects horrible) and how the government welfare rules are setup, it's almost like if you ask for help from the government, you must go by their rules and be under their control, so thank you, but no thank you.

Portfolio helps in maximizing benefits and at the same time protects against market fluctuations as money is invested in both less risky assets like government bonds and the most risky assets like small company stocks.