Sentences with phrase «like national academies of science»

Because the NRDC is a political advocacy group there is some spin but it does list a variety of studies from peer - reviewed journals like Science and Nature and from groups like the National Academy of Science from 2000 to 2004 and its easier to have a lot of papers on one site.

Not exact matches

These new findings, published this week online by the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, are an important key to the puzzle of how technology emerged as humans dispersed across the globe, says archaeologist Ofer Bar - Yosef at Harvard University, who, like Straus, did not participate in this study.

At the same time, he and like - minded colleagues developed key institutions such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the National Academy of Sciences and the Smithsonian Institution.

You can help by signing the petition to help get recognition for film editors by asking these organizations to add the Film Editing category to their annual awards: Sundance Film Festival Shanghai International Film Festival, China San Sebastian Film Festival, Spain Byron Bay International Film Festival, Australia New York Film Critics Circle New York Film Critics On Line National Society of Film Critics We would like to thank the organizations that have recently added the Film Editing category to their Annual Awards: Durban International Film Festival, South Africa New Orleans Film Festival Tribeca Film Festival Washington DC Area Film Critics Association Film Independent - Spirit Awards LA Film Critics Association Chicago Film Critics Association Boston Film Festival The International Animated Film Society — Annie Awards Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror - Saturn Awards

Like other great science institutions — New York City's American Museum of Natural History and the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of Natural History, in Washington, DC, for instance — the Academy logically might have focused on galleries and displays showcasing portions of its 20 - million - specimen collection, a cornucopia ranging from giant Galapagos tortoise shells to Maasai tribal shields to tyrannosaur fossil bones.

And I'd like to acknowledge the other organizations that have been obviously very important in this whole process — the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine — all who've contributed similar leadership in maintaining the tradition, upholding the highest standard of science.

Some of the least understood impacts of warming are the possible connections to health problems, like patterns of tropical disease and the frequency of smoggy days, as the National Academies of Science concluded in 2001.

Some leading lights in environmental science have been pushing their colleagues, and institutions like the National Academies, to come out swinging against the ongoing barrage of assaults from organized opponents of restrictions on greenhouse gases and climate skeptics / contrarians / denialists / realists (pick your label depending on your worldview).

I like the way each such section links directly to the relevant section of the underlying National Academy of Sciences report — «A Framework for K - 12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas.»

Studies like this usually take time to get published, but Emanuel «decided to use his status as a member of the National Academies of Science, which let him pick his own peer reviewers, who were likely to be friendly and get the review done quickly,» Ars Technica reported.

But the physics bureaucrats like those in The Union of Concerned Scientists, or the National Academy of Science often don't because no working scientists has time for such meaningless, but prestigous sounding, organizations.

Where things get problematic in terms of the old model of tolerance for academic mistakes is when unsound science is unquestioningly endorsed by some politicians as the only possible interpretation and then when this is curiously ratified by top drawer institutions like the National Academy of Sciences.

If you can't understand the difference between one media article saying that climate scientists are saying something and the actual unfiltered statements of these scientists made through the respected organizations like the IPCC, the National Academy of Sciences, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and as expressed through the peer - reviewed literature, then I can't help you.

Like I said, it is Lindzen... not I... who is proposing a vast conspiracy theory whereby because he can identify a few scientists who have connections to environmental groups or Al Gore or whatever, therefore the entire field of climate science has been hijacked, we can't trust the IPCC, the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Councils of the American Physical Society, the American Meteorological Society, and the American Geophysical Union, the editors of Science and of Nature, etc.science has been hijacked, we can't trust the IPCC, the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Councils of the American Physical Society, the American Meteorological Society, and the American Geophysical Union, the editors of Science and of Nature, etc.Science and of Nature, etc., etc..

However, a new report published in the National Academy of Science of the United States suggests that another super storm like Hurricane Sandy is less likely to hit New York.

And in 2016, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine announced that it's now possible to confidently attribute certain weather events, like some heat waves, directly to climate change.

Show them educational videos like this one by the Royal Society, the UK national academy of science: