The tribe has taken the lead against local projects
like oil terminals that would further climate change and threaten its existence.
Not exact matches
To be certain, the opposition to projects
like the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry Alberta
oil sands products to US markets, and the Northern Gateway pipeline, which would carry
oil sands products to a new west coast
terminal for export to Pacific markets, has caused delays and increased costs to proponents.
It owns and operates pipelines and
terminals that transport natural gas, gasoline, crude
oil, carbon dioxide and other products and stores petroleum products, chemicals and handle bulk materials
like ethanol, coal, petroleum coke and steel.
Residents of the Pacific Northwest have long been a bulwark against coal and
oil corporations, defeating destructive mega-projects
like the Gateway Pacific coal
terminal in Whatcom County, Washington and the Waterside Energy
oil refinery in Longview, Washington.
With projects
like rail
terminals, pipelines east and south, and other infrastructure underway to move
oil sands, Keystone XL barrels would be far from marginal.
Thank goodness environmental activists
like Fred Felleman are fighting back, opposing plans for massive coal export facilities, seeking to block new LNG export
terminals, and attempting to scuttle Keystone XL and TransMountain tar sands
oil pipeline expansions.
Instead, global traders will literally buy future
oil by the boatload, then book
terminal time at any deepwater ocean port
like the LOOP, anywhere in the world, to embark with two million barrels in a single cargo.