Gavin implicitly agrees about model uncertainty and states that climate change is also proven by other lines of eivdence —
like paleoclimatology.
Not exact matches
Compare that to the contribution of McIntyre and the statisticians
like Wegman or McShane and Wyner who seem to wear their ignorance of
paleoclimatology, or scientific methods for that matter, as a badge of honour.
[DC: That looks
like an interesting study in an area (Northern Ireland) where there has been little
paleoclimatology.
Sure
paleoclimatology can give us a good idea of past climate change but if Gavin thinks that we can know the temperature of the globe 22,000 years ago to within 0.4 of a degree then I have a bridge I would
like to sell him
Like the National Post before it, the Journal touted a narrow critique of dubious significance as a massive reversal of all
paleoclimatology, and indeed all of climate science.
It's rather ironic that a skeptic
like Dr. Idso is at least partially responsible for producing the proxy most important in getting multiproxy
paleoclimatology off the ground.