Sentences with phrase «like paying less taxes»

and I like paying less taxes.

Not exact matches

I have a student loan coming in, so I don't have to worry about where my next check is coming from [student loans work differently in Britain — they're paid back as a percentage of future earnings once a certain income threshold is reached and are generally taken directly from paychecks like a tax, producing far less repayment anxiety].

Each year I feel like I learn something new about taxes and even though it doesn't make paying taxes less painful, it makes me feel more aware and smarter about how I use my money.

Whether individuals or households will pay more or less will depend on a wide variety of factors, including whether they take the standard deduction, which reduces taxable income by a fixed amount, or they take targeted tax deductions, like subtracting mortgage interest or state and local taxes.

With the cancellation of the health care levy (which it should be pointed out was graduated and not a flat amount like the old premium), and the NDP tax increases kicking in at 130K and not 100K like the Prentice budget, the NDP has made sure the upper middle class (and some of the upper class) are paying less taxes than under Prentice's budget.

It has been speculated that a billionaire like Mr. Edwards would only pay about 3 percent less tax in the United Kingdom.

Everyone likes paying less in taxes, but no one wants to be audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

I am working on a plan like this in Canada (as there are far less people and it is easier to get through) because being from a socialist country it is vital for people to feel the money they pay in taxes is being spent on things that benifit them, even if it is only a percentage of the overall amount.

Do you really think that we can sustain a government with less than half the people in this country paying taxes, oh let me guess the liberal media didn't mention we can turn out like Greece so it will never happen to us!

Now, we're in an offseason where a potential superstar like Shohei Ohtani is only getting the league minimum after signing with the Angels for a capped international bonus figure; where one of the very best hitters in the game, J.D. Martinez, still can't find a reasonable offer with less than two weeks to go before spring training; where Yu Darvish can't sign with either of the teams he would like to (the richest out there, the Yankees and Dodgers), despite their having a need for a starter of his caliber, because they «need» to clear salary in order to avoid paying the luxury tax.

Everyone sees in it what they want to see, anyway, so I choose to see: no - one's that fussed about gay people anymore, and we'd all like to pay less tax, thanks.

Yes, it's an uncertain number and people can choose to pay more or less tax so it doesn't feel like a tax rise to them (although they may be hit with unexpected tax bill).

After all, if we economize by paying teachers less, have an easier time getting rid of those expensive older teachers, and deny teachers things like fringe benefits including pensions, we can all pay less taxes.

This includes gems like — paying less in taxes than it reports as «Taxes» in its annual reports, a cash routing scheme so elaborate that economists are calling it «unbelievable chutzpah», no one being sure of how Apple pays just 2 % tax in Ireland when the official rate is an already low taxes than it reports as «Taxes» in its annual reports, a cash routing scheme so elaborate that economists are calling it «unbelievable chutzpah», no one being sure of how Apple pays just 2 % tax in Ireland when the official rate is an already low Taxes» in its annual reports, a cash routing scheme so elaborate that economists are calling it «unbelievable chutzpah», no one being sure of how Apple pays just 2 % tax in Ireland when the official rate is an already low 13 %.

It almost seems like the government wants to reward us for taking the risk of investing in stocks by getting us to pay less taxes when we do!

Like those in Europe and the U.S., Canadians will simply need to get used to the idea of getting a little less help from the government while paying more in taxes.

Since I will not get any W2 or get very small amount of income like 20K, and my ordinary tax rate less than 15 percent so that I will pay 0 tax on long - term investment capital gain.

That's less than previously required but still probably means breaking slowly into capital: after all, Ottawa's «generosity» with the earlier RRSP tax refunds was always balanced by the knowledge the tax piper must eventually be paid: naturally, these RRIF withdrawals are fully taxable like salaried income or interest income.

I'm tempted to buy the house outright with cash and start building my savings account back up, which I feel like I could do rather quickly with no rent / mortgage to worry about (aside from HOA, insurance, property tax, maintenance, etc., which would still be dramatically less than what I'm currently paying in rent).

This means that when you sell your stocks, you'll pay taxes on your gains — and if you sell your stocks in less than a year, you'll pay a huge amount (regular income - tax rates, like 15 % or 30 %).

The more you pay in servicing costs like premiums and tax, the less you'll have available to repay your actual loan.

But after that, if my choice was between a «regular investment» or an investment I'd have to pay taxes on like T - bills or Bonds or (to a somewhat lesser extent) stocks I would want to remember that removing an expense goes further than adding income.

However, it seems like the vast majority of individuals who paid income taxes under the old law will pay less under the new one.

If you like to pay more taxes than less, this won't apply to you.

Beyond that, I like to consider whether early RRSP withdrawals allow someone to pay less total tax over their lives than deferring withdrawals until 71.

In a normal year, that's looking like a $ 1100 - 1200 tax credit, and it will decrease each year as we build more equity and pay less in interest.

Since discretionary spending — spending on things like a nice dinner out, a movie, or a luxury item like a new television — dips when people have less money, the additional taxes paid by Americans could presumable hurt business» ability to both hire new employees and be successful in the first place.

If the tax code was based on the reality that homes don't wear out like factory equipment — that homes appreciate, they don't depreciate — and the tax code removed the depreciation deduction for single - family homes and condos, the breakeven price most investors could pay for a house would be less and homes would be more affordable for American families.

with no taxes and «make money» which looks like I have more into the property and then I pay less on taxes.

If all your individual deductions on your 2016 tax return added up to more than $ 12,000 you would have paid less federal taxes if you had itemized all your individual deductions, like the mortgage interest deduction.

People will continue paying their property taxes like they have in the past and when it comes time to do their federal taxes, most people will pay less because of the doubling of the standard deduction.