Not exact matches
But if Moynihan hits his mark and
returns all of B of A's profits to
shareholders, with earnings now in the $ 20 billion range, the yield would rise to 8.5 %, and the total
return to more
like 12.5 %.
Valeant's spectacular
returns have attracted high - profile investors
like hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, who admiringly described Pearson as an «outsider CEO» in a 2014 note to
shareholders.
«In an environment
like this
return cash to
shareholders keeps them pleased with the short - term gains while not committing to large investments that could hurt performance.»
Assuming the CEO mantle at Canadian Western Bank on March 7, Chris Fowler inherited a track record of 99 consecutive profitable quarters and a Buffett -
like 4,147 %
return for
shareholders — or 17.5 % a year on average.
Except that, as PwC's Strategy & discovered, in key sectors
like consumer packaged goods there is no direct correlation that can be drawn between being big and achieving higher
shareholder returns.
All are
returns that would please any long - term
shareholder (the Nasdaq Composite is up a mere 106 %) but nothing
like the run Priceline has seen.
So as it currently stands we feel
like we are
returning capital to
shareholders as well as investing in businesses, doing acquisitions and at the same time we are maintaining financial strength and flexibility.
Buffett also notes in his latest letter to Berkshire Hathaway
shareholders that for smaller investors avoiding high unnecessary fees and buying a good ETF index fund from a company
like Vanguard is a great option for solid
returns.
But for the time being, it looks
like General Mills
shareholders will remain hungry for more savory
returns from the stock.
When investors ignore these often - significant minority interests,
like in the case of KMI, they are not getting the full picture of a company's cash available to be
returned to
shareholders.
I emphasized issues
like valuations and peak - to - peak
returns in the semi-annual report, because the period of unusual overvaluation since 2000 might otherwise leave
shareholders with an inaccurate understanding of «characteristic» performance for the Strategic Growth Fund.
A dividend stock that shows virtually no growth (think utilities) and
returns close to 100 % of its cash flows to
shareholders is more
like a bond than a growth stock.
I also
like their strategy related to the dividend — they've openly stated how they aim to
return money to
shareholders when possible and the last two special dividends of $ 5 and $ 7 per share proves that.
I'll be honest: Even though the term is widely used, I don't
like «
returning cash to
shareholders» when it is applied to buyback programs.
On the surface that seems
like a bit of a head scratcher but I still
like their direction long term and of course agree with their efforts to
return capital to their
shareholders.
I have been looking at various Chinese small caps, but in most cases I'm thinking that I simply
like DSWL more because it's profitable, the balance sheet is rock solid and the company has a long history of
returning cash to
shareholders.
This is a critical management decision companies
like American Capital Agency (NASDAQ: AGNC) and many more have proven to provide incredible
returns to
shareholders.
So for this wonderful business, even paying 25 times earnings worked out to a stellar
return for
shareholders of around 13 % annually for 15 years even as the P / E multiple contracted from 25 all the way down to 10, which would be a very low multiple for a great business
like this.
When presented separately
like this, the additional rate of
return a dividend paying stock produces for
shareholders becomes undeniably evident.
Like Allstate, they are oozing free cash flow in this environment, and don't have as many reinvestment opportunities; they ought to be
returning cash to
shareholders, but cautiously, buying only on dips.
Any unusual transactions wd stand out
like a sore thumb... The investment objective's v clear also —
return capital to
shareholders — any departure from that wd immediately be called out by
shareholders (and prob.
mREITs are
like equity REITs REITs payout 90 % of their taxable income to
shareholders in dividends, and, in
return, pay no tax on the earnings they distribute — but that is about where the overlap ends.
Since index funds simply buy the stocks or bonds that make up indexes
like the Standard & Poor's 500 or Barclays U.S. Aggregate bond index rather than spend millions on costly research and manpower to identify which securities might perform best, they're able to pass those savings along to
shareholders in the form of lower annual fees, which translates to higher
returns and more wealth over the long term.
The company has
returned something
like 15 - 25 % of its current market cap to
shareholders in the past couple years (if I remember correctly).
In recent years, investors are increasingly likely to penalize companies which refuse to
return surplus cash to
shareholders — Argo Group's current valuation looks
like a prime example.
Seems
like there may be a more serious / ongoing effort to rationalise / improve the portfolio, but obviously there's no indication when (if ever) substantial value might actually be realised here &
returned to
shareholders.
I know it often seems
like he is into paying himself at the expense of
shareholders, but I do think his ego is tied to the
shareholder returns of BH so believe that he wants
shareholders to do well (unlike most CEO's who don't care at all about
shareholders).
If you have a direct / indirect shareholding in Argo Group (large or small), and would also
like to see a substantial
return of capital to
shareholders, please email me at
[email protected]
Every dollar of
shareholders equity at BRK is working in an equity -
like manner and is NOT sitting on cash and bonds earning low
returns.