Sentences with phrase «like socialism»

Stupid ideas must be shat upon or they will fester in to things like Socialism and crocs.

I mean so I don't know if there's a sociological or socioeconomic theory or body of work behind this yet; but it seems like if those are your choices and you don't like socialism, communism and you realize you can't continue growth, you need something different.

That would be almost like socialism.

Exactly like socialism or islamism.

Where the genuinely mixed economy becomes a reality (as, for example, in Sweden), capitalism clearly becomes much more like socialism, and is therefore more palatable.

If all this sounds like socialism, it really isn't.

Not exact matches

The common thread is that Australia's farmers think they can control the marketplace, just like the good old days when collectivism and agrarian socialism were popular theories — like back in the 1930s.

Evangelicals tend to ignore Christ's Sermon On The Mount in Matthew because it sounds like a blue print for socialism.

Socialism, just like communism, legislates oppression, and is quite happy to suppress the individual's freedom for its own ill - advised principles.

James Nuechterlein replies: If Mr. Segermark has his way, the word socialism will no longer mean what it has always meant» public ownership and control of the means of production» but something along the lines of «left - wing programs I do not like.»

I would like to know how business convinced America that socialism is somehow contrary to Christian doctrine.

Religion (like nationalism, socialism, or any other «ism») was only used to compel and rally the masses into fighting for the rich and powerful and greedy.

Rather than admit the failure of capitalism and pursue socialism, FDR» like other Presidents before him» sought to solve domestic problems by overseas economic expansion.

If the actions of Christ and his early followers are what people like Rush call communism, socialism and Marxism, then Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ and the early Christians were the greatest Marxists!

It's like all lovers of Socialism: They think it's great as long as the government is not coming after their money.

I love when idiots use socialism and communism in the same sentence like they are the same thing.

It provided an ideological framework within which the many religious communities of India as well as the plurality of linguistic caste and ethnic cultures (in the formation of which one or other religions had played a dominant role) could participate together with the adherents of secular ideologies like Liberalism and Socialism (which emerged in India in the framework of the impact of modern humanism of the West mediated through western power and English education).

OK, that may be true in a secular state like the USA but in Islamic states, Islam is the form of government — not democracy, not communism, not socialism or any other «ism».

I think the primary difference between Coots as being representative of Christians and Pol Pot representing atheists is that Coots, like many Christians, claimed to believe in a specific creed whereas there is no atheist creed, Pol Pot pushed a radical form of agrarian socialism on his people.

the reason most americans want nothing to do with your religion is because it smells like that other stench we kicked back into the sewer in the 1940's called national socialism.

I would like to point out that the trraditional «state religion» of progressive socialism is atheism.

That's not government regulated socialism; that's self - sacrificing communism (or perhaps the «term» Love is more appropriate... I just like to rile people up by using political terms somethimes).

The real story here is who created all these desperate people and communities like the Pope and the Church that have to reach out to socialism for meaning.

Henry Ward Beecher saw socialism «drifting in from the eastern ocean like a Newfoundland fog.

Globalization strikes us now so strongly as we come to the end of the century and the millennium, not because it is new, or something that suddenly crept on us in some sinister way (like some people in the United States used to speak of «creeping socialism»!).

I like a good amount of socialism mixed in with the private world.

Leaving aside the evidence that arrives each day from Eastern Europe which seems to show that the opposite is the case, that socialism there has in some sense «frozen» traditional ways of life, there is a more important issue: one wonders if tradition, when purchased and consumed like a commodity, can really play the role which some conservatives believe it must in any healthy society.

No wonder people like to share the load with socialism.

A couple of fellows who own the largest share of stock in Aqueduct (known in the trade as «Footsore Downs») claim they are being frozen out of racing, and they keep muttering ugly words like «socialism.»

Tradition has it that Liverpool FC stands for socialism, even while many of the legends who bestrode the Anfield turf quietly voted Tory because they liked the idea of lower taxes.

Similar to a Mixed Economy like @NotMe linked, something else you can read about (but tends towards the left of the spectrum) is Market Socialism.

Socialism is not communism - socialism (broadly speaking) means there are things like welfare, public education and socialised Socialism is not communism - socialism (broadly speaking) means there are things like welfare, public education and socialised socialism (broadly speaking) means there are things like welfare, public education and socialised medicine.

@JustinBeagley - this seems like it's entirely written from the socialism = communism = evil and will never work = yay captialism viewpoint, isn't it?

It depends somewhat on how one defines socialism and communism (and the problem is, most people don't even have a good definition, conflating the two; and also conflating things like social - democracy).

Ramsay MacDonald, in his Socialism and Society (1906), succinctly outlined this view: «History is a progression of social stages, which have preceded and succeeded each other like the unfolding of life from the bud to the fruit.

It's entirely possible for a democracy to have other forms of economies - like pure socialism, or even communism, while maintaining democratic governments.

which looks like a play on «English Socialism» and could be a reference to the Fabians.

So, how exactly does Ba'athism compare with movements like Integralism, Fascism, National - Socialism, National - Solidarism, Juche, Maoism, Stalinism and / or other movements that promote Authoritarianism and / or a one - party state in combination with Socialist principles and Nationalist principles?

Much of the wealthy within the US is generally against using their money to finance social constructs (healthcare is a big one here, but it's used against a pretty wide array of social programs) and a consistent tactic to whip up support is to use the lines «this is socialism, all socialism is communism, communism is evil, therefore «insert hot topic like universal healthcare» is evil.

Socialism like MMM, promises prosperity, equality and financial security, but most often,...

Seems like most people here make a distinction between the technocratic RBE, and the democratic communism, but doesn't that just make RBE the socialism stage (at least as the version defined by Lenin), before the communism stage of material abundance which naturally leads to a society which doesn't require government or «democracy» as it is known today?

Well the ferocious capitalists of the sovereign wealth funds sure do like Obama's brand of socialism.

Ultimately, Fascism and National socialism are not inherently evil ideologies like historians would have you believe, and they are certainly not the same.

Marxism is the body of work by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels and covers subjects like economics, Socialism / Communism.

«The one or two remaining proponents of hard - left socialism in Parliament like Corbyn and McDonnell were for years treated almost as museum piece dinosaurs, worth preserving for the sake of historical curiosity» he jibed.

In many ways, this is the 21st - century version of the Guild Socialism that so many around him would like to rehabilitate — an alternative to both the market fundamentalism of the Conservatives and the nanny - statism often associated with the Labour Party.

Young people are more interested in socialism than capitalism according to recent polls and events like People's Climate March show a general interest in ecology.

Possibly most of the «socialists» within the Labour Party — like even Tony Benn and Jeremy Corbyn — not being Socialist Workers Party style socialists, did not leave the Party and instead grudgingly accepted our dilution to social democracy for the main reason that pure socialism sans in - govt would remain a mere theory and would be worse than practical social democratic reforms / reliefs whilst in power -LRB--- and particularly bebeficial / necessary after a prolonged Thatcherite damage to our society!

Like Corbyn is, he was driven by loyalty to leftwing socialism, rather than the Labour party.

Like Nesbit, Olive Wellwood belongs to the Fabian Society, a group that advocated for democratic socialism and social reforms, and the novel concerns itself with progressive social and artistic movements as well as fairy tales and folklore.