Sentences with phrase «like teaching need»

Complex skills like teaching need to be broken down into smaller components and elements overlearned before the next more challenging goal is determined.

Not exact matches

That's just common sense, of course — you don't need to be an accomplished dog - cognition researcher like Horowitz to realize that children should be taught limits when it comes to the family dog (or cat, or bird, or whatever).

The software robot is «taught» through a flowchart - like interface (without coding) to drive systems of record and follow the business rules needed to complete a process as a person would.

The training teaches bankers about the opportunities and challenges female financial decision makers face so women business owners like Philp can develop the partnerships they need.

By LAURA LOREK Publisher of Silicon Hills News A huge gap exists between what colleges are teaching students and what a company like Apple needs, an Apple executive said Thursday.

Christ never taught the need to believe in anything like the creeds.

I am for the elimination of hate, fear and control, religion is just the catalyst that people use to hate, fear and control, getting rid of religion won't solve the problem, its like putting a band aid on a severe cut, its temporary, and it just hits the surface, instead we need to go deeper than that to the root cause, I know lots of religious people who don't hate, fear or control, there are also many beliefs such as paganism, Buddism, Taoism, which doesn't use hate fear, and self righteousness to condemn others, I think if maybe more of the most major religions followed there teachings then we wouldn't have as much problems as we do.

-- like the Republican evangelicals who all think their church is the most Christian, the most right, the only ones going to heaven yet ignore the real teachings of Jesus by judging others, ignoring charity and the needs of their community, not understanding when the Lord's Prayer begins with «Our» Father — the «Our» is not just white people.

And they need to be taught that other things, like God, we really don't know a damn thing about.

As schools like the University of LaVerne model the needed changes at institutional and curricular levels, and as more and more faculty are helped to think about how their own teaching can be greened, the pace of change can increase.

They just need to be taught that some things, like all religion, were just made up by salesmen and politicians from long ago.

They just need to be taught that some things, like all religions, are just junk that was made up by salesmen and politicians long ago; and that other things, like god, we really don't know a damn thing about.

They just need to be taught things that are unknown, like god, and things that are made up, like all religion.

Yes, they need to be taught to believe in gods, but babies don't have the ability to determine that gods are, or aren't real either, which make that argument a whole lot less compelling than the people who like to use it would like.

Like the Sunday school system itself, this motherly - person image was a recognition that, in terms of method, the family could not be counted on to do the whole needed teaching job along with services of worship.

Churches need to be teaching centers where faith and tradition can be explored, where truth can be pursued without the employment of authoritarian cliches like «the church teaches» or «the Bible says» to stifle the questioning process.

We all know that Adam is the first human created by The Almighty and then The Almighty taught Adam the names and everything he needed to know and then HE created his partner from him and then rest of us created from the mixing of sperm and ovam except Jesus who created from only mother who was virgin and this is sign for mankind that God can create anything, also the creation of Jesus is like the creation of Adam... how does it turns to what u saying dear brother Greg...

Hasidic teaching is like psychoanalysis, writes Buber, in that it refers one from the problematic of external life to that of the inner life, and it shows the need of beginning with oneself rather than demanding that both parties to a relationship change together.

Not because I don't think Christianity is true and the kids, like all sinners, need to know the truth, but because teachers who don't know all the basics about the Bible would mess it up or if they were an atheist being forced to teach it would probably spread their bias and teach things wrongly on purpose.

A century later, we are living in the closing years of a pontificate that has, above all, taught Catholics not to be afraid» afraid of those who hate the Church so that we do not honestly contemplate the failings of our own past; afraid of the progress of science so that we needed to be reminded by the Pope «that faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth.»

Well I think when Jesus said love your enemies, he was not talking about a teaching that he himself would have needed to practice, cause like the buddhist (or whoever) say, the boat (teaching) is used to cross the water, but once it has done it's job you leave it at the shore, you do nt drag it with you else it will just weigh you down.

I stopped visiting church building's I needed time to think, I said to a neighbor that the churches do not teach like Jesus did.

Like other forms of freedom it is easily abused, and the interpretation which individuals give to the revelation needs to be checked by various forms of corporate prophetic teaching.

It sounds to me like you mean, «We need more Church leaders... who teach exactly what I want to hear.»

They just need to be taught that some things, like all religion, are just made up by salesmen and politicians from long ago; and that other things, like god, we really don't know a damn thing about.

Her mothering impulse teaches that all of us, in a way, are children wrapped in wet blankets — and that sometimes a rescue must be mounted, like a mother who summons courage, devotion and if need be ferocity to save a child.

Thankfully this is taught... our world needs less people like you.

«Remenber all scpritures are inspired words from God, my point is, Jesus wants us to be more than religious, but obedient.Jefferson is just stating that American Churches have become more corrupted with its religious practices that they have forgotten about jesus along the way.The church has taken scriptures and have use them according to what is pleasing to themselves.Jesus wants us to forget about what is pleasing to ourselves and follow him, be like him, love him (means be obedient to him) and ignore what we have known as religion.I define religion as jefferson is using in the video as an act of man pretending or decieving himself into believing that he know God and that he is better than others.He shows that by what he know / pratice not really whats in his heart and by serving how we choose which is pleasing to us, so we use God as a vessel praticing holy rituals teaching what we have made tradition and we have a eternal life with God.God created religion in order for us to remenber him and have a personal relationship with him through his son regardless of the many mistakes we have made in the past.We need to remenber God Forgets our past «he sperate our sins from us as far as the east is from the west».

Find it... I feel like I would need to read the Bible cover to cover multiple times and then get a masters in Hebrew to find that kind of teaching.

looks like we need to cover the territory more often since you really have learned nothing about what the bible really teaches or what we know.

Let me tell you that just because a lot of people call themselves «Christians» doesn't mean they truly follow what God says and it is a shame that because of people like the ones you describe, a lot of other people choose not to believe in God and the thing is that the Bible teaches to do the opposite of what you say «believers» usually do... I have friends who believe in so many different things, or nothing at all, and just because they don't believe what I believe, doesn't mean I won't pray for them or be there when they need me.

I know it looks like they stopped teaching government in schools, but they need to do something about people's writing skills.

However, the Association of Christian Teachers has described the move as a step too far, speaking on Premier's «News Hour», Chief Executive of ACT, Clive Ireson said: «from a Christian point of view they're aren't nurseries; of very many of them that would be teaching it as a scientific fact during their science curriculam, they'll be teaching it during their RE curriculam areas and those bible stories like creationism need to be taught during that time».

Like Andrew said, we need regular teaching, spiritual feeding.

If Centered churches want to be Christ - like, those words need to be taught.

«Favoring people [like Christians] on the basis of their faith rather than their needs is definitely discriminatory and contrary to the Bible's teaching,» he said.

In the first place, like all the Gospels this one teaches us faith and love; for it presents Christ to us as a most loving Savior and Helper in every need and tells us that he who believes this is saved.

She, like the rest of us, needs a church that proclaims biblical truth — correct teaching, forgiveness of sins, encouragement in the faith, and the hope of eternal life in Jesus» name.

Those of us who have been following Driscoll's rise to popularity within the neo-Reformed movement over the last decade have been warning that teachings like these reveal a disturbed and dangerous man who needs counseling, not a place at the pulpit.

You said in your first post — «And they need to be taught that other things, like God, we really don't know a damn thing about.»

Really, it sounds like he needs someone to teach him how to do a shop and how to make basic things.

The No Kid Hungry campaign connects kids in need to effective nutrition programs like school breakfast and summer meals and teaches low - income families to cook healthy, affordable meals through Cooking Matters.

The No Kid Hungry campaign connects kids in need to effective nutrition programs like school breakfast and summer meals and teaches low - income families to cook healthy, affordable meals through its Cooking Matters program.

You don't need to cook foie gras and lobster every night to be considered a great cook, in fact it's pretty easy to cook with luxurious ingredients... it's much harder to teach a cook how to work with underutilized fish species like scup or sea robin, teach them how to make even the toughest cuts of meat and scraps a winning dish and work with fruit and produce that isn't processed and ready to cook, then also teach them what to do with the potential waste, to me that's really cooking.

No Kid Hungry connects kids in need to effective nutrition programs like school breakfast and summer meals and teaches low - income families to cook healthy, affordable meals.

Good luck to him i hope he stays cause hes seen it all and we need people like him teaching the tricks to the next Adams coming thro.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

There's definitely a case for the CBs bcoz we have a lot of them out but for the DM position it's so obvious that xhaka needs protection bcoz he's only good going forward and elneny was like a headless chicken yday he's positioning was awful and that nack for filling in the gaps left by full backs or pinching the ball of the opposition cant be taught over night it's a natural thing like nzonzi has that nature!

For example, BRT spoke about how we need to teach men not to feel entitled to certain things (like women's bodies) they don't have a right to, as well as not conditioning «famous» people to believe they can get away with things by idolizing them so much.

It is part of the reason why Wengers training has been likened to teaching rather than drilling on the training ground, Wenger likes his players to know what to do and not be dummies who need to be told to run back to defend, kinda why he is rarely on the touchline telling his players what to do.