Sentences with phrase «like that fact then»

Not exact matches

Colbert, much like Wolf, mocked Bush's apparent distaste for facts, hammered the administration's actions in Iraq, and described Bush's then - 32 % approval rating as «backwash» — all while the president was sitting less than 10 feet away.
Since then the U.K. government has published several position papers but Verhofstadt — like many in Brussels — was largely dismissive of their utility, since «most of them were in fact papers concerning the future relationship between U.K. and the European Union.»
Again, that fact doesn't obviate the option of (or indeed the need for) social critique; it just means that we can't reasonably roll our eyes at the very notion of a place like Hooters, and then merrily skip down to the neighbourhood bar where the waitresses wear short skirts and tube tops all summer.
I liked the fact that people came together and batted around ideas, and then, as an editor, you would look for the perfect writer for it, somebody who could make it better than you imagined, then ultimately putting an issue together was about getting the right mix and the right tone.
If you're tired of hearing sentiments without facts like «We need authentic leaders» or «Leaders need to build trust,» then Pfeffer's book is a must read.
«If Facebook continues to grow as a trusted news source in its own right,» Salmon argues, «then the result could be an existential crisis for news organizations with old - fashioned things like editors and fact - checkers and clear ethical guidelines.»
If we include the fact that the perpetrator's two manifestos clearly state a strong personal dislike of the VP of Information Technology (whom the perpetrator referenced as having made specific comments in the past) and the CEO, and specifically names employees that are liked and are doing a good job, then it seems, without a shadow of doubt, to be an open and shut case.
«The fact is, what the 40 - year - old state worker should be concerned about right now is getting reform, because if they just put their heads in the sand, then we will have a Detroit - like problem in New Jersey, in Illinois, in California, and lots of other states across this country,» he said.
Mining stocks are an extremely volatile asset class where the odds of any investor getting into a story, experiencing impressive gains, only to then take a round trip back to break - even... and finally into NEGATIVE territory are actually quite high (sadly)... In fact, that dreaded rollercoaster ride where you see all your once «hefty» profits in any single position later eviscerated into NOTHING is something that I've experienced more often than I'd like to admit...
If one's counterargument to this fact is that this particular task is the job of a portfolio manager, then (1) why assign such misleading titles like «financial consultant / adviser» to their employees when salesman is a more appropriate title; and (2) why does nearly every portfolio manager employed by commercial investment firms stick to low - utility diversification strategies that consistently underperform non-managed, passive index funds year after year?
That allegation suggests behavior much like what Harvey Weinstein reportedly perpetrated for years in Hollywood: a powerful man in entertainment using his perch to pursue sex by dangling a gig in front of someone hungry for success in the industry ---- then using threats after the fact in order to keep her from exposing his behavior.
Then there is the word «typically» like in «In fact, the first 25 % of the tightening cycle is typically the best part of the stock market cycle».
The fact is that in 2007, 2008 and 2009 funds were drawn from government resources, just like we said in the budget, and then from subsequent public accounts.
I stated a fact and then backed it with a source... you resorted to name calling, making you look like the one who is infantile.
If mormons have nothing better than to pretend like it had power over skeletpns, then let it, but the fact is that LDS is powerless.
In spite of some of my differences with the good Dr. Dobson (no, Jesus wasn't born Republican), I like the fact that unless they have great need they don't hammer you about money, and even then it's not a constant barage.
We are so quick to call our ideological opposites names and then ignore the fact we are being just like them.
yo the thing is not about believing or not, is the fact that if we don't believe then we are worthless living garbage who occupy a space in the universe only to create crap and pollution, in that kind of case we would better be recycled into some industrial material for a better use than eating and living like cattle, but if there is a god we acquire a divine status and a purpose to continue to exist beyond afterlife or at least the idea of it, which would give life a sense right?
If it seems like it could happen to a biologist, then next week biologists will say it is a fact regardless of how improbable it is.
Kind of an odd logic, seems to me, but then again, I explore facts and reality; sounds like you stick to what you're fed.
i did read page 2 and i know what im talking about you obiosly do nt because you all think hitler was a christian and he wasnt because im a christian and i know for a fact christians do nt act like that you can claim it all youd like but you should of read more up on history and if you think hitler was a christian your wrong because even if he said he was a christian then he wasnt a real one
Then you continue to justify that easy out conclusion by putting God in the same category as Santa Clause, the Easter Bunny, or the Flying Spagetti Monster since you can't prove that they don't exist and it's ridiculous to believe in those ergo that automatically means that is just as ridiculous to believe in a God, like a one conclusion fits all scenario even though that scenario still doesn't change the fact that you are concluding something that can not be proven.
And then I had one of those revelations that is in no way new or shocking and is, in fact, the subject of a Michael Jackson song, the AA poem, cheesy motivational office posters, and the like.
Man and women were not made in the Garden of Eden period, facts are facts just like the world is not round unlike what christians use to think back then.
If you're going to use the stupidly overdone kiddie world of warcraft «fail» meme like all of the other idiots, then at least get your facts straight.
There is only one spirit that would say you are not forgiven and that is the antichrist spirit, the same spirit that led men to smash the face in of Jesus so that he no longer looked like a human being then stood back and watched his life drain away on a hot sunny day not realising that he was in fact watching the freedom of men in all its glory.
If you don't like that fact, then you have no business being a follower of Jesus.
In fact, let me go so far as to say that if what God wants to do is slaughter people because they don't do what He wants, then I don't mind it so much if people decide not to worship a God like that.
You wise Scientist — Can you please scientifically explain to me where did the stuff came from that caused the «BIG BANG» — if you can not do that your so called science are based on a belief and not on facts as you so eagerly would like to promote — so — then your view is also based on faith and not science, because science should be able to observed and tested, but faith must be taken and believed.
Bill n truth - we haven't seen resurrections today, but the fact that billions of people call themselves Christians, is more then enough proof to believe that Jesus resurrected to heavens, and therefore, the resurrections of the bible like Lazarus really happens!
So in the first place I thought that if you were hetero then you liked women how is it that they were hetero and gay??? How do you explain the fact that they would not take lots daughters to mean that they were passing by women in favor of men that sure sounds gay to me.
But hey, once you finally can admit that there are agendas on both ends... you can then try to duck the «observable facts» problem... like what caused the universe... oh wait..
But then she convinced me that she had found the real deal in a small home church and it didn't take long for me feel like I truly belonged there and that it was in fact everything I had ever wanted in a church.
If something like this is the fact, it is then easy to see why a «self», totally detached from its experiences, is hardly worth preservation.
Then they wiggle and worm, employ Ad Hoc Hypothesis until one of the debaters faints from exhaustion, then finally invoke magic to overcome the facts they don't lThen they wiggle and worm, employ Ad Hoc Hypothesis until one of the debaters faints from exhaustion, then finally invoke magic to overcome the facts they don't lthen finally invoke magic to overcome the facts they don't like.
«I think that when he accepts the fact that we know that he loves Jesus Christ then I think I'll like him a little better.
I guess I have reached a point that, if it can't be backed up with such obvious scientific evidence, then it is not important enough for me to accept it as a fact... yet... even if I would like for it to be true.
If that is so, then we must say that he, like other early Christian preachers, gave a place in his preaching to some kind of recital of the facts of the life and ministry of Jesus.
to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.
But I'd grown overconfident, so the fact that I'd never in my life used a pastry blender or a rolling pin didn't stop me from going right ahead and whisking together some flour, sugar, and salt, cutting in two sticks of butter, adding some water, and then kneading it all together to form two disks that looked exactly like the picture on page 438, thank you very much.
He ignores the fact that in war you kill people and capture enemies, and then drops every context (while accusing Peikoff of that), and simply argues that we should not torture our enemies in war because it is (somehow) unethical — he offers no real argument as to why it is immoral, and only tries to make Peikoff look like a buffoon.
IF atheism isn't a belief, like you say, then it must be a scientific fact (law) such as Newtons laws of motion, planetary motions, and meteorology.
If you think for a second that any Christian is going to let a little thing like the facts get in the way of doing exactly as they please then you haven't been paying attention.
you can insult atheists all you like, fact is we atheists on average know more then you about relgion and the god you claim is the one and only, the true god... question is, what do YOU know?
I also don't like the fact that you bring down the Christian faith and ultimately say God is not able to talk to His people this I believe is done because unless you can destroy the reputation of the church then you can not get your own way.»
Hey truthfollower — If in fact you Christians regard «death as a blessing» then why are you all afraid to die just like the rest of us?
If a woman is raped, it is extremely immoral to insist she carry that child to term and then be forced to relive the nightmare of the act of violence every day - how do you think that would affect a child (outside of the fact that people like you get your pocketbooks lined as a result)?
If the writer seems to be stating a factlike a score, a location, a player's name, a description of the plays leading to a touchdown — then I'd take that as literal.
Then they realized that would expose the fact that many choose in and out of gender role, like you and I choose shoes... so... they switched to s@xual orientation!»
Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z