Not exact matches
Colbert, much
like Wolf, mocked Bush's apparent distaste for
facts, hammered the administration's actions in Iraq, and described Bush's
then - 32 % approval rating as «backwash» — all while the president was sitting less than 10 feet away.
Since
then the U.K. government has published several position papers but Verhofstadt —
like many in Brussels — was largely dismissive of their utility, since «most of them were in
fact papers concerning the future relationship between U.K. and the European Union.»
Again, that
fact doesn't obviate the option of (or indeed the need for) social critique; it just means that we can't reasonably roll our eyes at the very notion of a place
like Hooters, and
then merrily skip down to the neighbourhood bar where the waitresses wear short skirts and tube tops all summer.
I
liked the
fact that people came together and batted around ideas, and
then, as an editor, you would look for the perfect writer for it, somebody who could make it better than you imagined,
then ultimately putting an issue together was about getting the right mix and the right tone.
If you're tired of hearing sentiments without
facts like «We need authentic leaders» or «Leaders need to build trust,»
then Pfeffer's book is a must read.
«If Facebook continues to grow as a trusted news source in its own right,» Salmon argues, «
then the result could be an existential crisis for news organizations with old - fashioned things
like editors and
fact - checkers and clear ethical guidelines.»
If we include the
fact that the perpetrator's two manifestos clearly state a strong personal dislike of the VP of Information Technology (whom the perpetrator referenced as having made specific comments in the past) and the CEO, and specifically names employees that are
liked and are doing a good job,
then it seems, without a shadow of doubt, to be an open and shut case.
«The
fact is, what the 40 - year - old state worker should be concerned about right now is getting reform, because if they just put their heads in the sand,
then we will have a Detroit -
like problem in New Jersey, in Illinois, in California, and lots of other states across this country,» he said.
Mining stocks are an extremely volatile asset class where the odds of any investor getting into a story, experiencing impressive gains, only to
then take a round trip back to break - even... and finally into NEGATIVE territory are actually quite high (sadly)... In
fact, that dreaded rollercoaster ride where you see all your once «hefty» profits in any single position later eviscerated into NOTHING is something that I've experienced more often than I'd
like to admit...
If one's counterargument to this
fact is that this particular task is the job of a portfolio manager,
then (1) why assign such misleading titles
like «financial consultant / adviser» to their employees when salesman is a more appropriate title; and (2) why does nearly every portfolio manager employed by commercial investment firms stick to low - utility diversification strategies that consistently underperform non-managed, passive index funds year after year?
That allegation suggests behavior much
like what Harvey Weinstein reportedly perpetrated for years in Hollywood: a powerful man in entertainment using his perch to pursue sex by dangling a gig in front of someone hungry for success in the industry ----
then using threats after the
fact in order to keep her from exposing his behavior.
Then there is the word «typically»
like in «In
fact, the first 25 % of the tightening cycle is typically the best part of the stock market cycle».
The
fact is that in 2007, 2008 and 2009 funds were drawn from government resources, just
like we said in the budget, and
then from subsequent public accounts.
I stated a
fact and
then backed it with a source... you resorted to name calling, making you look
like the one who is infantile.
If mormons have nothing better than to pretend
like it had power over skeletpns,
then let it, but the
fact is that LDS is powerless.
In spite of some of my differences with the good Dr. Dobson (no, Jesus wasn't born Republican), I
like the
fact that unless they have great need they don't hammer you about money, and even
then it's not a constant barage.
We are so quick to call our ideological opposites names and
then ignore the
fact we are being just
like them.
yo the thing is not about believing or not, is the
fact that if we don't believe
then we are worthless living garbage who occupy a space in the universe only to create crap and pollution, in that kind of case we would better be recycled into some industrial material for a better use than eating and living
like cattle, but if there is a god we acquire a divine status and a purpose to continue to exist beyond afterlife or at least the idea of it, which would give life a sense right?
If it seems
like it could happen to a biologist,
then next week biologists will say it is a
fact regardless of how improbable it is.
Kind of an odd logic, seems to me, but
then again, I explore
facts and reality; sounds
like you stick to what you're fed.
i did read page 2 and i know what im talking about you obiosly do nt because you all think hitler was a christian and he wasnt because im a christian and i know for a
fact christians do nt act
like that you can claim it all youd
like but you should of read more up on history and if you think hitler was a christian your wrong because even if he said he was a christian
then he wasnt a real one
Then you continue to justify that easy out conclusion by putting God in the same category as Santa Clause, the Easter Bunny, or the Flying Spagetti Monster since you can't prove that they don't exist and it's ridiculous to believe in those ergo that automatically means that is just as ridiculous to believe in a God,
like a one conclusion fits all scenario even though that scenario still doesn't change the
fact that you are concluding something that can not be proven.
And
then I had one of those revelations that is in no way new or shocking and is, in
fact, the subject of a Michael Jackson song, the AA poem, cheesy motivational office posters, and the
like.
Man and women were not made in the Garden of Eden period,
facts are
facts just
like the world is not round unlike what christians use to think back
then.
If you're going to use the stupidly overdone kiddie world of warcraft «fail» meme
like all of the other idiots,
then at least get your
facts straight.
There is only one spirit that would say you are not forgiven and that is the antichrist spirit, the same spirit that led men to smash the face in of Jesus so that he no longer looked
like a human being
then stood back and watched his life drain away on a hot sunny day not realising that he was in
fact watching the freedom of men in all its glory.
If you don't
like that
fact,
then you have no business being a follower of Jesus.
In
fact, let me go so far as to say that if what God wants to do is slaughter people because they don't do what He wants,
then I don't mind it so much if people decide not to worship a God
like that.
You wise Scientist — Can you please scientifically explain to me where did the stuff came from that caused the «BIG BANG» — if you can not do that your so called science are based on a belief and not on
facts as you so eagerly would
like to promote — so —
then your view is also based on faith and not science, because science should be able to observed and tested, but faith must be taken and believed.
Bill n truth - we haven't seen resurrections today, but the
fact that billions of people call themselves Christians, is more
then enough proof to believe that Jesus resurrected to heavens, and therefore, the resurrections of the bible
like Lazarus really happens!
So in the first place I thought that if you were hetero
then you
liked women how is it that they were hetero and gay??? How do you explain the
fact that they would not take lots daughters to mean that they were passing by women in favor of men that sure sounds gay to me.
But hey, once you finally can admit that there are agendas on both ends... you can
then try to duck the «observable
facts» problem...
like what caused the universe... oh wait..
But
then she convinced me that she had found the real deal in a small home church and it didn't take long for me feel
like I truly belonged there and that it was in
fact everything I had ever wanted in a church.
If something
like this is the
fact, it is
then easy to see why a «self», totally detached from its experiences, is hardly worth preservation.
Then they wiggle and worm, employ Ad Hoc Hypothesis until one of the debaters faints from exhaustion, then finally invoke magic to overcome the facts they don't l
Then they wiggle and worm, employ Ad Hoc Hypothesis until one of the debaters faints from exhaustion,
then finally invoke magic to overcome the facts they don't l
then finally invoke magic to overcome the
facts they don't
like.
«I think that when he accepts the
fact that we know that he loves Jesus Christ
then I think I'll
like him a little better.
I guess I have reached a point that, if it can't be backed up with such obvious scientific evidence,
then it is not important enough for me to accept it as a
fact... yet... even if I would
like for it to be true.
If that is so,
then we must say that he,
like other early Christian preachers, gave a place in his preaching to some kind of recital of the
facts of the life and ministry of Jesus.
to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as
fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most
fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but
then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the
FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most
FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much
like evolution)
then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.
But I'd grown overconfident, so the
fact that I'd never in my life used a pastry blender or a rolling pin didn't stop me from going right ahead and whisking together some flour, sugar, and salt, cutting in two sticks of butter, adding some water, and
then kneading it all together to form two disks that looked exactly
like the picture on page 438, thank you very much.
He ignores the
fact that in war you kill people and capture enemies, and
then drops every context (while accusing Peikoff of that), and simply argues that we should not torture our enemies in war because it is (somehow) unethical — he offers no real argument as to why it is immoral, and only tries to make Peikoff look
like a buffoon.
IF atheism isn't a belief,
like you say,
then it must be a scientific
fact (law) such as Newtons laws of motion, planetary motions, and meteorology.
If you think for a second that any Christian is going to let a little thing
like the
facts get in the way of doing exactly as they please
then you haven't been paying attention.
you can insult atheists all you
like,
fact is we atheists on average know more
then you about relgion and the god you claim is the one and only, the true god... question is, what do YOU know?
I also don't
like the
fact that you bring down the Christian faith and ultimately say God is not able to talk to His people this I believe is done because unless you can destroy the reputation of the church
then you can not get your own way.»
Hey truthfollower — If in
fact you Christians regard «death as a blessing»
then why are you all afraid to die just
like the rest of us?
If a woman is raped, it is extremely immoral to insist she carry that child to term and
then be forced to relive the nightmare of the act of violence every day - how do you think that would affect a child (outside of the
fact that people
like you get your pocketbooks lined as a result)?
If the writer seems to be stating a
fact —
like a score, a location, a player's name, a description of the plays leading to a touchdown —
then I'd take that as literal.
Then they realized that would expose the
fact that many choose in and out of gender role,
like you and I choose shoes... so... they switched to s@xual orientation!»
Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and
then judges fairly thats not evil in
fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them
like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.