The defendants will
likely appeal the decision, which could take months.
However, it should be noted that Equifax will
likely appeal the decision, so it may be years before there is a final decision.
Not exact matches
They were
likely lured by the
appeal of a startup, along with the chance to wield greater input; much of the policy
decision - making at Google comes from its Mountain View headquarters.
Tufts University will
likely restore official status to Tufts Christian Fellowship (TCF) after student leaders
appealed a
decision by the student judiciary to de-recognize the group.
Nor, from the evidence he provides, are Democrats
likely to recover, if only because the people who make such
decisions are so different from the people they have to
appeal to.
An
appeal on the merits is not available for Tribunal merger authorisation
decisions, but the ACCC is seeking judicial review, alleging three reviewable errors, including that the Tribunal erred in its reasoning that «it could only conclude that the proposed acquisition was
likely to result in a detriment if the Tribunal concluded that there would be a substantial lessening of competition».
Feerick has until Oct. 18 to rule, but even a
decision in favor of the players is not
likely to trigger a quick resolution of the lockout because the owners are certain to
appeal in court.
However, Ibrahimovic is
likely to factor in his family into his
decision, and although a short stint on a lucrative deal would be
appealing, it might not be enough to sacrifice other aspects of his life.
Meanwhile, at an event in New Paltz earlier today, the governor said he has yet to review the EPA
decision, but the administration will
likely appeal the clawback.
«We conclude that appellant has not satisfied his burden of persuasion to show that any substantial question of law or fact raised upon
appeal is
likely to result in reversal,» read the
decision, which was filed Wednesday.
MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT — Former state Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver is fighting to stay out of prison while he
appeals his corruption conviction — a pending
appeal that he's
likely to win thanks to a recent U.S. Supreme Court
decision, his lawyers argue in court papers filed this week.
Moreover, states wishing to implement bans are not required to scientifically justify their
decisions and can
appeal to more arbitrary concerns such as fears of GMOs contaminating other non-GM produce and
likely public backlashes over use and cultivation.
«The city joined the
appeal as an act of good faith as part of those talks, and to defend the broader city land use rules, which were not at issue in the earlier
decision but were
likely to arise once an
appeal was heard.»
Because U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor sat on an
appeals court which heard one of the lawsuits, she will
likely recuse herself, leaving the real possibility that the case will receive a 4 - 4
decision.
Although based on Lamberth's previous rulings in the case, he seems
likely to rule in favor of the plaintiffs and issue a permanent injunction, Robertson predicts that stay or a new version of it would remain in place while the
decision is
appealed.
Robert Cook - Deegan, director of the Center for Genome Ethics, Law & Policy at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, called today's ruling «a very interesting
decision» that's
likely to lead to further legal action: «I wouldn't be surprised if both sides
appealed to the Supreme Court.»
«It is
likely we'll have a key
decision from the
appeals court on whether Dickey - Wicker allows federal funding for human embryonic stem cell research.»
Of course, it's his being ahead - of - the - curve that
likely appealed to star Tom Cruise — «Oblivion» was originally conceived as a graphic novel by Kosinski, a
decision made to better illustrate his concept to executives.
Like just about every groundbreaking
decision, this one includes dramatic language to make its point (and
likely help sustain the
decision on
appeal).
The
decision, which the state plans to
appeal, is
likely, the experts say, to increase the use of the comparable - worth concept in job - evaluation schemes of private and public employers — including public - school systems — nationwide.
Even though the Chancery Court's ruling — regardless of outcome — would
likely be
appealed to the Mississippi Supreme Court, Callen said it would be «a disaster» if
decisions about school funding were given.
This move will more than
likely cause a delay to a
decision being made over whether to pass... → Read More: Suit Filed By Financial Industry Dismissed By
Appeals Court
Potential pet owners who choose a puppy or adult dog that is healthy, trainable (or already trained), and capable of fitting the family dynamic are more
likely to develop an enduring and rewarding relationship than those who make snap
decisions based on an emotional
appeal.
The case was lost before the Court of
Appeals of the District of Columbia; it is
likely that it will return to the Supreme Court, which may get a chance to modify its 2007
decision.
Similar cases are set to go to trial in California (as early as Oct. 22) and Rhode Island, and the auto makers are
likely to
appeal the
decision.
«That having been said, we certainly recognize that there are court proceedings in two other jurisdiction — one in B.C, where they're waiting for a
decision from the court of
appeal, and of course the likely Supreme Court of Canada appeal out of the Ontario Court of A
appeal, and of course the
likely Supreme Court of Canada
appeal out of the Ontario Court of A
appeal out of the Ontario Court of
AppealAppeal.
As an aside, all of the extra work demanded of the defence lawyer in R. v. Murphy (see paragraphs 10 and 11 of the
appeal decision, for example),
likely would not have been services covered by Legal Aid Ontario.
The Court of
Appeal upheld Gaul J.'s
decision and found that that there was no reasonable grounds to believe that using a keyword to place one colleges» website in a higher priority on Google than it would otherwise deserve, «was misleading or
likely to mislead».
In the area of class actions, it is significant that a Respondent may now apply for leave to
appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court granting a Motion for Authorization (Certification)(article 578), a move which will
likely have an impact on strategy in first instance and Respondents»
decisions whether to consent to authorization and proceed directly on the merits, or not.
On 30 October 2014 the UK Court of
Appeal released a
decision that is
likely to send a frisson of fear down the spine of governments everywhere.
With the Federal Court of
Appeal's
decision this year considering terms like «inventive concept», «the solution taught by the patent»
likely mean the same things, we have more available approaches to determining the obviousness of a patent.
A prominent B.C. law firm says it's «highly
likely» it will
appeal a Supreme Court of British Columbia
decision slamming two of its lawyers for a misleading representation resulting in an invasive search warrant.
On
appeal, the appellate Court will embark upon a case by case analysis to determine whether the interim
decision is
likely to have a direct bearing on a fundamental trial issue; this is the standard of review.
This
decision of the Court of
Appeal confirms that employers should beware when drafting contracts as on numerous occasions, the ET has looked behind the contract to ascertain exactly what the person carrying out the work is actually doing and if in reality the requirement is for personal service, if the company exerts control over the person, if the person receives pay slips even though they submit invoices and have signed an agreement which imposes restrictive covenants, then even ifthe person carrying out the work has agreed to label of «self - employed», submits VAT returns, is taxed as self - employed and claims tax advantages it is
likely that the ET will find that the person is a worker and will be entitled to holiday pay and various other advantages not enjoyed by the self employed.
It does not consider a lot of things, including the quality of the
decisions, whether the
decisions she wrote were particularly complex (i.e. a 2 paragraph
decision dismissing a simple
appeal is not the same as a 200 paragraph
decision that makes new law) and how often she was in the majority on a
decision (if you're a frequent dissenter, then you're more
likely to write reasons given that you're being chosen from a smaller pool of potential authors).
Although the multiplicity of views expressed by the variety of Singapore courts and dissenting judges who have considered the matter may lead some to suggest that the position is unclear, it is submitted that the majority
decision of the Singapore Court of
Appeal is
likely to find favour.
However, the final
decision of a majority of the Singapore Court of
Appeal in the «Persero» case19 is
likely to enhance the enforceability of the DAB's
decisions.
In my view, others are also
likely to be grateful because, in agreement with the FtT judge and them, and in disagreement with the Legal Aid Agency
decision maker, this
appeal is one that raises issues on which it is appropriate for the Upper Tribunal to give guidance.
«The
decision will almost certainly be
appealed and it is
likely to take several years to finally resolve.
Just a few minutes ago, as you hid behind your status like a coward, you made comments about me that were both unjust and unjustified, scattering them here and there in a
decision, the good faith of which will most
likely be argued before our Court of
Appeal.
Today's
decision will almost certainly be
appealed and will
likely take several years to finally resolve.
The
decision is
likely to be
appealed by the Defendant and awaits the imprimatur of the Ontario Court of
Appeal and perhaps the Supreme Court of Canada... [more]
Authors Theodore Eisenberg and Michael Heise of Cornell University Law School conclude that two findings dominate: first,
appeals courts are more
likely to disrupt jury verdicts than bench
decisions, and second, trial defendants fare better than plaintiffs on
appeal.
Due to the ramifications of the
decision (mainly that Uber will have to pay its workers the national minimum wage and holiday entitlements) the
decision is
likely to be
appealed.
The company will
likely appeal the Los Angeles jury's
decision.
It is expected that the
decision will
likely be
appealed no matter what the CHRT decides in this case.
But even if affirmed on
appeal, plaintiffs» class action lawyers are
likely to try to distinguish the facts in their cases from those in this UberBLACK
decision.
While the Fair case is reportedly still under
appeal, signalling that this case is
likely fair from over, if the
decision stands it will undoubtedly change most employee's approach to wrongful dismissal cases.
In light of the Alberta Court of
Appeal's Black & Decker
decision, the vague evidence finding was
likely essential to the remedial award in this case.
But once you figure out what you think is the right reasoning, it makes sense to present it as persuasively as possible, at least if you think it's
likely that the
decision will be
appealed.