That means it's
likely atmospheric heat rather than lack of snow is driving the glacier retreat.
Not exact matches
Of course, the extra
heat trapped by human greenhouse gas emissions is
likely to play a bigger role than raindrop friction in any
atmospheric changes.
Another principal investigator for the project, Laura Pan, senior scientist at the National Center for
Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., believes storm clusters over this area of the Pacific are
likely to influence climate in new ways, especially as the warm ocean temperatures (which feed the storms and chimney) continue to
heat up and
atmospheric patterns continue to evolve.
Gray believes that the increased
atmospheric heat — which he calls a «small warming» — is ``...
likely a result of the natural alterations in global ocean currents which are driven by ocean salinity variations.»
It will also increase vital
heat transfer about the planet too, helping resist
atmospheric collapse
likely on the permanently cold night side of any synchronous planet.
Black et al. (15) analyzed basic factors that
likely contributed to the summer 2003 European
heat wave, examining large - scale
atmospheric flow, regional
heat budget at the top of the atmosphere, and sea surface temperature.
Not all at once of course, but as mentioned above, when the PDO goes positive, we can
likely expect a significant change in the
atmospheric heat content as
heat energy is transferred from the deep oceans back into the atmosphere.
More
likely, Earth's continuing decline in
atmospheric temperatures will resume after the current minor rising blip is over, just as the Sun, our source of
heat and light, is signaling and consistent with the continuing cooling of Earth through a significant portion of its long history.
Elsewhere on this site there is a graph of overall ocean
heat content which is building indicating that while the sst is decreasing slightly the overall ocean is warming, It is
likely that this overall ocean warming which has nothing to do with changes to the
atmospheric temperature because it is the sea surface and not the deep ocean that is in contact with the atmosphere is what is resulting in the overall rise in
atmospheric CO2 concentration which is currenly increasing at 2ppmv / year.
Much of the warming in the Arctic in the 20s and 40s, as well as in recent decades was
likely due to increased ventilation of ocean
heat after sea ice was reduced by intruding warm water and the altered
atmospheric circulation.
The detrimental effect of extreme summer
heat is
likely to be further exacerbated by increased
atmospheric moisture.
For Europe specifically, it is estimated that the CO2 flux from land vegetation contributes to reduce the global net flux associated with
atmospheric growth of CO2, but the relative magnitude of this sink has been decreasing since the 1990s (from capturing 40 % of the global growth previously, to about 20 % now),
likely further to changes in the
atmospheric transport of
heat and humidity over Europe.
However, it is
likely that at night (when there is no incoming solar energy) or at other times when
atmospheric conditions are such that there is a temperature inversion, any LWIR that has been delayed has sufficient opportunity to radiate to space there by meaning that no excess
heat is «trapped» (ie., the
heat in the atmosphere does not build up).
If we can increase
atmospheric CO2 without rich nations suffering, say, killer
heat waves, then it's more
likely that we'll just continue burning all the coal'til it's gone.