Sentences with phrase «likely challenge it in the courts»

If the commission gives the new rules a nod next month, consumer groups will likely challenge them in court.

Not exact matches

2014 is likely to mark a sea change for patent litigation, as both the Supreme Court and Congress actively figure out ways to rein in costly challenges brought by non-practicing entities, or trolls.

Ireland, the country most likely to hold a referendum, is doing its best to avoid holding one, though such a decision is likely to be challenged in court.

Secondly WHATEVER they decide looks likely to be challenged in the courts.

Republicans are challenging the measure in state court, but they'll likely lose.

While it is likely that Vacco will ask a judge to halt the Paladino replacement process sometime in the next few weeks before the board moves on that, Cambria says a state supreme court challenge to an administrative ruling — called an Article 78 proceeding in legal - speak — actually has a longer timetable and must be filed within four months of the ruling.

If Dr Fayemi challenges the ban in court, he is likely to have it quashed and set aside.

-- they are likely to be struck down if challenged in court.

News of the trial is also likely to raise the morale of federally funded researchers at the US National Institutes of Health working on hESCs, as the legality of federal funding for their research is being challenged in court.

Changing antitrust laws to allow for more flexibility will likely require legislative action, given companies» limited ability to challenge them in court.

It was the first time the right to petition in court under the Data Quality Act was challenged, but it will most likely not be the last.

Dan Reicher, who served as assistant secretary of Energy for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy at the Department of Energy during the Clinton administration, said that the more consistently the Obama administration can write its Clean Power Plan, the more likely it will survive challenges in the Supreme Court.

The requirement is likely to be challenged in court by free - speech advocates, according to Chris Hansen, an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer in New...

In 2006, the Mackinac Center for Public Policy published the results of a survey of organizations working on school choice that I conducted; it found that 67 % of respondents think vouchers are more likely to be challenged in court, compared to just three percent who chose tax credits - and, by a margin of 53 points, respondents also thought that tax credits were more likely to survive a court challengIn 2006, the Mackinac Center for Public Policy published the results of a survey of organizations working on school choice that I conducted; it found that 67 % of respondents think vouchers are more likely to be challenged in court, compared to just three percent who chose tax credits - and, by a margin of 53 points, respondents also thought that tax credits were more likely to survive a court challengin court, compared to just three percent who chose tax credits - and, by a margin of 53 points, respondents also thought that tax credits were more likely to survive a court challenge.

In 2002, Frank Kemerer, regents professor of teacher education and administration at the University of North Texas, reviewed each state's case law and judicial climate in order to characterize the likely orientation of the courts if a voucher law were to be challengeIn 2002, Frank Kemerer, regents professor of teacher education and administration at the University of North Texas, reviewed each state's case law and judicial climate in order to characterize the likely orientation of the courts if a voucher law were to be challengein order to characterize the likely orientation of the courts if a voucher law were to be challenged.

This is PIJAC's largest and most expensive effort in 2017, as it is likely to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to challenge the court's decision and fund the development of an environmental impact study.

The court is currently hearing a substantive challenge to the interpretive rule, and in light of today's ruling, the hemp industry is optimistic that the Court will ultimately invalidate the DEA's rule, as one of the prime criteria in granting the Stay was whether the hemp industry is likely to ultimately prevail on the merits of the court is currently hearing a substantive challenge to the interpretive rule, and in light of today's ruling, the hemp industry is optimistic that the Court will ultimately invalidate the DEA's rule, as one of the prime criteria in granting the Stay was whether the hemp industry is likely to ultimately prevail on the merits of the Court will ultimately invalidate the DEA's rule, as one of the prime criteria in granting the Stay was whether the hemp industry is likely to ultimately prevail on the merits of the case.

The good news is that the CPP is a legal mess, very likely to be overturned in court, and certain to be challenged by the GOP - led Congress in 2015.

What began as a challenge to ZECs could likely prove the first skirmish in a lengthy battle, one that may reach its final resolve in the Supreme Court.

This would likely involve seemingly arcane tweaks to models and baselines that would be harder for green groups to challenge in court.

These were to address one or more of eight issues seen as important to courts: form - filling — making court documents more accessible to litigants in person; order drafting — creating orders that are more likely to be accepted by courts; continuous online hearing — challenging the question of whether a court is a place or a service; argument - building — to aid non-lawyers in creating well - structured arguments, distinguishing fact from law; outcome prediction — using technology to answer the natural question «what are my chances of winning?»

The US plans to impose tight quotas on the judges who hear them are ill thought out — likely by civil servants with little or no understanding of the practical challenges of working in immigration appeal and court work.

For employers, this means it will likely be far more difficult to challenge an administrative body's decisions in court.

Steven Barrett, a labour and constitutional lawyer and managing partner at Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP, says there will likely be other cases on this topic in the future, with five related court challenges currently in process across Canada.

The report, by Block G Privacy and Security Consulting, said: «Until national policies are established or court challenges arise... the use of UAVs by Canadian policing bodies will likely continue to be somewhat ad hoc and primarily constrained by the SFOC process and [law enforcement agencies»] interests in avoiding public pushback of UAV - based practices.»

Sir William Blair, the former judge in charge of the Commercial Court, highlights one key challenge — that the UK's imminent exit from European Union means we are likely to face a legal framework that is considerably more complex than that which we have now.

The plaintiffs challenged eight restrictions on judicial conduct: 1) the prohibition on judicial candidates campaigning as a member of a political organization, 2) the prohibition on judicial candidates making speeches for or against political organizations or candidates, 3) the ban on judicial candidates making contributions to political causes or candidates, 4) the prohibition on judicial candidates from publicly endorsing or opposing candidates for public office, 5) the prohibition on judges from acting as a leader or holding office in a policitical organization, 6) the prohibition on judicial candidates knowingly or recklessly making false statements during campaigns, 7) the ban on judicial candidates making misleading statements, and 8) the prohibition on candidates making pledges, promises, or committments in connection with cases, controversies, or issues that are likely to come before the court.

Enforcement issues are, however, less likely to arise in relation to investment treaty disputes arbitrated under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States (the ICSID Convention), which does not provide for the challenge of ICSID awards before national courts on traditional New York Convention grounds (which include public policy).

In the event that Mr. Roberts, rather than Zoomermedia, had challenged the enforceability of the same provision, it is quite likely that the Court would have found the clause to be void (see for instance, the Court of Appeal's ruling in the recent case of Wood v. Fred Deeley Imports LtdIn the event that Mr. Roberts, rather than Zoomermedia, had challenged the enforceability of the same provision, it is quite likely that the Court would have found the clause to be void (see for instance, the Court of Appeal's ruling in the recent case of Wood v. Fred Deeley Imports Ltdin the recent case of Wood v. Fred Deeley Imports Ltd..

The federal government will likely be hesitant to interfere with a decision of Quebec's National Assembly, in order to avoid political tension, but to avoid setting a precedent for other provinces; the federal government would have little choice but to challenge the law in court.

On the other hand, if reasonableness is chosen instead of correctness, the court may be less able to police executive decision - makers where they are mistaken in their views or are following their own self - interested view of the right policy (as opposed to that of the legislature), litigants who lose in front of a decision - maker will be less likely to challenge the decision and decision - makers may make more aggressive interpretations that do not accord with legislative goals.

To be sure, there are storm clouds on the progressive legal horizon: the UT affirmative action case; Shelby County and the future of the VRA; the reargument in Kiobel; the Article III standing question in the constitutional challenge to the FISA Amendments Act; and a host of other cases in the food chain in which the Court's conservative majority is likely to assert itself at the expense of progressives.

The Court determined that the Appellant's challenge was to the conduct of the Respondent in bringing and pursuing disciplinary proceedings against her, not to an alleged state of affairs in which BME lawyers were more likely to be the subject of such proceedings.

The constitutional challenge launched by the group in 2007 differs from the ongoing challenge of the sex work laws in Bedford v. Canada, likely to be heard by the Supreme Court next year.

It's also likely that an order barring Muslims from the country would be subject to numerous challenges in the courts.

It's pretty likely that if the policyholder's ability to alter a policy is ruled against in divorce court, they'll be unable to change the beneficiaries of their policy in the future without a legal challenge.

In order to make sure marital agreements are enforceable and likely to survive a court challenge, it's best to get legal help.

In sum, utilizing the collaborative process just makes sense when drafting a prenuptial agreement because (i) it aids in transparency and ensures fairness for the less wealthy spouse while (ii) it also provides confidence to the more wealthy spouse that the prenuptial agreement will likely be upheld if ever challenged in courIn sum, utilizing the collaborative process just makes sense when drafting a prenuptial agreement because (i) it aids in transparency and ensures fairness for the less wealthy spouse while (ii) it also provides confidence to the more wealthy spouse that the prenuptial agreement will likely be upheld if ever challenged in courin transparency and ensures fairness for the less wealthy spouse while (ii) it also provides confidence to the more wealthy spouse that the prenuptial agreement will likely be upheld if ever challenged in courin court.