While St. Louis doesn't have to worry directly about sea levels or ice melt, stronger weather patterns including more droughts and floods are
likely consequences of global warming, they said.
According to Time magazine's very latest wisdom, the epochal blizzards that have hit the Northeast this winter are
a likely consequence of global warming.
Not exact matches
Conservatives are, on the whole, more aligned with business and / or industry Since industry is most
likely to be adversely affected by the
consequences of regulations to reduce
global warming (emissions restrictions, for example) there is an incentive to deny
global warming.
This is clearly the case with
global warming, as the
consequences of our current lifestyle are not
likely to be fully realized for another 25 to 50 years.»
The
consequences of climate change are being felt not only in the environment, but in the entire socio - economic system and, as seen in the findings
of numerous reports already available, they will impact first and foremost the poorest and weakest who, even if they are among the least responsible for
global warming, are the most vulnerable because they have limited resources or live in areas at greater risk... Many
of the most vulnerable societies, already facing energy problems, rely upon agriculture, the very sector most
likely to suffer from climatic shifts.»
That order
of sea level rise would result in the loss
of hundreds
of historical coastal cities worldwide with incalculable economic
consequences, create hundreds
of millions
of global warming refugees from highly - populated low - lying areas, and thus
likely cause major international conflicts.
Even in a
warming climate, we could experience an extraordinary run
of cold winters, but harsher winters in future decades are not among the most
likely nor the most serious
consequences of global warming.
So basically you are arguing that because the economic losses and other destructive
consequences of global warming may result in demands for government action to deal with them, we should reject the scientific evidence that such
consequences are already occurring and are
likely to get worse.
Denial
of the reality
of anthropogenic
global warming, or denial
of the
likely horrific
consequences thereof, is entirely based on ignoring «real science».
It should be televised just like Hussein's hanging and we can all show the same mercy on Bush that he did on the 152 deathrow inmates he executed without one inkling
of remorse, not to mention the 4000 American's he sent to death under false pretenses, not to mention the people mentioned in this article
likely to bear the worst
consequence of global warming.
Although the countries
of Africa have some
of the lowest overall and per capita
global warming emissions on the planet, they are also
likely to suffer from some
of the worst
consequences of climate change.
This technical document seeks to quantify how a 1 - meter sea - level, as a
consequence of global warming, would affect coastal wetlands in 76 developing countries and territories, taking into account how much
of wetlands would be submerged and how
likely the wetlands would move inland as the coastline recedes.
This might be expected, since the younger generation may see itself as most
likely to have to live with the
consequences of global warming.
«We conclude that the 2 °C
global warming «guardrail,» affirmed in the Copenhagen Accord, does not provide safety, as such
warming would
likely yield sea level rise
of several metres along with numerous other severely disruptive
consequences for human society and ecosystems,» Hansen and his colleagues wrote.
In this context, for the Administration to have released a U.S. Climate Action Report with a chapter on climate change impacts that identified a range
of likely adverse
consequences, based on scientific reports including the National Assessment, could rightly be seen as an anomaly and appeared to be seen as a significant political error by Administration allies dedicated to denying the reality
of human - induced
global warming as a significant problem.
Starting in October 2002, in this final - stage editorial review and clearance process, it came to my attention that CEQ Chief
of Staff Philip Cooney was extensively marking up reports in a manner that had the cumulative effect
of adding an enhanced sense
of scientific uncertainty about
global warming and minimizing its
likely consequences, while also deleting even minor references to the National Assessment.
That order
of sea level rise would result in the loss
of hundreds
of historical coastal cities worldwide with incalculable economic
consequences, create hundreds
of millions
of global warming refugees from highly - populated low - lying areas, and thus
likely cause major international conflicts.
Because climate change is
likely to cause death to many, if not millions
of people, through heat stroke, vector borne disease, and flooding, annihilate many island nations by rising seas, cause billions
of dollars in property damage in intense storms, and destroy the ability
of hundreds
of millions to feed themselves in hotter drier climates, the duty to refrain from activities which could cause
global warming is extraordinarily strong even in the face
of scientific uncertainty about
consequences.
The
likely loss
of natural chemicals that might have life - saving value in advancing the development
of new medicines should be added to the list
of consequences of global warming, ocean acidification, and loss
of biodiversity.
We need severities, probability and confidence, scientists» views on the
likely roles
of different forcings and feedbacks, interpretations
of the pause in mean
global surface temps, estimates
of consequences and benefits
of warming, etc..
In fact, based on my own analysis
of the raw data, I believe that the
global warming trend over the 20th century is most
likely real but is largely as a
consequence of recovering from the Little Ice Age.
With these trends in ice cover and sea level only expected to continue and
likely worsen if atmospheric carbon dioxide levels continue to rise, they could alter the stresses and forces fighting for balance in the ground under our feet — changes that are well - documented in studies
of past climate change, but which are just beginning to be studied as possible
consequences of the current state
of global warming.
With
global greenhouse gas emissions at their highest level in history, the impacts
of climate change have already been felt «on all continents and across the oceans»; the more we emit, the more the
warming will continue, and the
likelier we'll all be to experience «severe, pervasive and irreversible»
consequences.
The last factor in our catalog
of likely consequences of severe
global warming is increased health risk — a topic close to the hearts
of most people and nearly every politician.
A: Each year, scientists learn more about the
consequences of global warming, and many agree that environmental, economic, and health
consequences are
likely to occur if current trends continue.