Not exact matches
This does not mean that lawyers shouldn't explain the range
of likely outcomes — this is
of course a key obligation when giving advice on a settlement — but lawyers should give some deference to the client's decision and to refrain from encouraging
litigation by unreasonable promises
of vastly improved outcomes.
In Serious Fraud Office (SFO) v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd6 the court held that documents prepared during the
course of a criminal investigation were not covered by
litigation privilege, even though there was
likely to be (and eventually was) a criminal investigation by the SFO into the alleged misconduct.
«The panel finds that Justice Matlow participated in controversial political discussions, inappropriately used the privileged platform
of judicial office, publicly offered legal advice and criticism, took a role in
litigation that was
likely to come before his court, communicated with the press in the
course of advancing a specific point
of view in a legal and political dispute against a party that was imminently to appear before him in
litigation, and failed to ensure that his actions and the extent
of his involvement in the dispute with that party were disclosed to his co-panelists [on Divisional Court] and to the parties,» said the panel.
There have,
of course, been successful elements
of the Woolf changes but ask an observer what the overall effect has been and they are
likely to say that over the last 10 years the
litigation process has become more expensive and complex.
Lawyers quite reasonably prefer to have control over the
course of a legal proceeding, but if they cede the bulk
of that control to an amateur — specifically, you — with little or no
litigation experience, the fear is that you might blame them in the event that you lose your court case, in effect, holding them responsible for errors
of incompetence that were
likely due to your own handling
of the matter.
The global defence strategy will
likely evolve over time — and it should — but it is important to keep all team members updated with new witnesses, themes, documentation, and strategies that arise as the
course of litigation progresses.
Of course, technically since you have already copied songs and shared them with friends, you have very likely already infringed many copyrights; however posting copies so that thousands may download unauthorized copies of many songs will just make litigation more attractiv
Of course, technically since you have already copied songs and shared them with friends, you have very
likely already infringed many copyrights; however posting copies so that thousands may download unauthorized copies
of many songs will just make litigation more attractiv
of many songs will just make
litigation more attractive.