Not exact matches
The paper even seems to express some understanding of Fr Maciel's (still, strictly speaking, only alleged) actions, in its reference to «the growing understanding that the abuse is most
likely the result of illness, not
criminal intent.»
In these situations, prosecutors will
likely pursue
criminal charges for possession with the
intent to distribute.
As in Texas law,
criminal assault generally requires some element of
intent to harm or provoke, or the knowledge that such actions are
likely to harm / provoke.
Sure, it's annoying to others, but it's not
likely to cause a death or even serious physical harm (unless perhaps you're seated next to a violent
criminal with the means and
intent to do physical harm).