«If it's something as simple as building them better roads or more
likely job tax credits or other forms of assistance they provide I see nothing wrong with that,» Seitz said, «but where I fault the resolution is in failing to make clear that we are not opposing that.»
Not exact matches
While the
tax bill has been promoted by Republicans as a
job creator, the reality is that drug companies are more
likely to return the money to shareholders, or use it to make acquisitions.
The narrative reveals more about today's hyper - partisan discourse than about the reality of the new
tax law, which is
likely to affect
jobs and the economy in important ways that don't fit either party's talking points.
Advertisements by the pro-HST side, for example, offer up accountants testifying to the
job - creating benefits of the harmonized federal - provincial levy over the alternative specified in the referendum question, a reintroduction of the 7 % provincial sales
tax — hardly the sort of stirring campaign rhetoric
likely to rally a silent majority to its side.
You could
likely deduct the cost of travel as a
job hunting expense on your 2014
tax return, but you would have to claim the reimbursement as income on your 2015 return.
Higher
taxes and (most
likely) less government spending will surely take a bite out the economy and hiring this year, but there are still a few reasons to be optimistic that the economy and
job growth will be more robust in 2013 than 2012:
Citing the 2010 General Social Survey evidencing that companies with employee stock ownership were four times less
likely to lay off employees during the Great Recession than conventionally owned companies, ESOP Association President, J. Michael Keeling, urged the Congress to consider
job sustainability when reforming the Federal
tax code.
Relieved from the
tax burden, businesses will
likely increase wages and create
jobs directly and through buying more equipment, investing in new technology and expanding domestic operations.
Senate Democrats plan to hold a test vote on a bill that would give small businesses
tax breaks for boosting payrolls, the opening salvo in a long - anticipated election - season fight over which party's
tax cut plan is more
likely to help spur
job creation.
«But, instead those programs and schools are
likely to be on the chopping block if «Schools of Hope» passes, and instead a few millionaires who are politically connected and run for - profit schools will get our
tax dollars intended for our children and the public school teachers the resources they need to do their
job.»
If she took a
job in Maryland then she would
likely save money on income
tax if the rates were as you suggest (and
likely made up for by other
taxes / fees).
Enter the annualized figures from your independent contractor
job into a
tax preparation software package to get the amount you are
likely to owe at the end of the year.
I'd maintain my advice, to grab the match regardless, as there are other factors involved, the more
likely return of ~ 8 %, the
tax differential should one lose their
job, and the hope that one would get their act together and pay the debt off faster.
Meanwhile, 88 per cent of respondents said they would use personal savings like RRSPs or
tax - free savings accounts to help fund retirement, while 59 per cent said they would
likely take a part - time
job.
Imho it probably depends on the nature of the
tax, and what its used for, and with a revenue neutral carbon
tax, or carbon
tax and dividend the money is
likely to flow back into
job creating activities rather the black hole of government.
It's been so good that some question the wisdom of swapping the current system for a severance
tax — especially given a recent study showing that the net effect
likely would be less energy development, resulting in billions in economic losses and nearly 18,000 fewer
jobs supported by 2025.
And since the carbon
tax will most
likely just move
jobs from the idiot nations that put one in place to the non-idiot nations like China and India... the amount of CO2 emitted will go up.
But it would help prevent people from falling into the «welfare trap» in which getting a
job — one that's
likely low - paying, and with
taxes, travel time, childcare costs, and more added on top — isn't a worthwhile option versus just staying on government support.
Bigger companies looking to stay competitive in the
job market — like their compatriots Fidelity and PricewaterhouseCoopers — will
likely begin to offer student loan aid regardless of the
tax consequences.
The downside to this
job is that it can be tricky finding clients and you'll most
likely have to do your own
taxes.
If there is a lengthy break between leaving your previous position and beginning to look for a new position, then any
job - search expenses are
likely not deductible on your
tax return.